Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trans protest- sharing for balance

1000 replies

Tandora · 20/04/2025 11:47

There’s a thread sharing some really awful images from the protest, so I wanted to share some positive ones for the sake of some perspective/ balance.
A lot of people are really understandably incredibly angry and overwhelmed by the events of the last few days. But most people who support trans rights absolutely don’t condone fighting oppression and injustice with misogyny.

Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
BePlumRaven · 20/04/2025 15:03

Tandora · 20/04/2025 15:01

It’s a really complex question. I’d be happy to discuss this as with many other subjects, but there’s no place for a civilised conversation when people just keep insisting that transwomen are men and that stating otherwise is a conspiracy to destroy women. If that is the level of where the conversation is it’s impossible to have a reasonable discussion about policy.

Is this satire or genuine? It’s hard to tell.

Riaanna · 20/04/2025 15:04

TheCatsTongue · 20/04/2025 14:55

I don't know how anyone can say "trans women are women" when they refuse or can't define what "trans" is.

Or what a woman is.

aylis · 20/04/2025 15:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The metric certainly won't be how they identify internally will it? It will be on verifiable sex, same as for every woman.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 20/04/2025 15:04

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:53

they absolutely do not want to erase women.

True. They want to erase the legal existence of female people as a distinct single sex legal and social group called "women", and replace that with a mixed sex group based on feeling that would be called "women" instead. "Women" woudl still exist but the actual people would be different.

But here is the trick and the tell... they want the original group to carry on doing what they always did being female-bodied women in single sex spaces even though their spaces are now mixed sex and their identity as female has been delegitimised, so that the trans women's fantasy of womanhood is still there for them to inhabit.

It's not enough to tell us we have to include them, the TRA version of trans acceptance also requires that we are not allowed to leave, to say "oh ok, if that is what a woman is, turns out I'm not one, I'll just go and set up something for female-bodied people somewhere else" because even though they do not accept womanhood is female bodied, they also do not accept female bodied people defining themselves as simply female outside genderist roles.

Once you see it you can't unsee it. TW need us to accept the definition of women as not because of sex to let them in, but carry on behaving as if it was so the place they wanted to get in to continues to exist.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/04/2025 15:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Did you mean to be so racist?

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/04/2025 15:04

PastIsAnotherCountry · 20/04/2025 14:59

OT Your username is excellent. Is it a reference to asking for a goat or being ‘gifted’ one?

Oh thank you. No, I just have a deep love for alpacas and feel my life garden would be much enhanced with one in it.

Unfortunately the big man has yet to deliver but its no surprise as I'm still waiting on a Barbie dream house too 🙄.

Unpaidviewer · 20/04/2025 15:04

The "but not all" brigades are really irritating. When something like this happens your community should condone the behaviour and make it clear that it is unacceptable.

Our local Muslim community went through something terrible and they immediately condoned the behaviour and said that the individuals involved did not live by the morals and beliefs a Muslim should have.

On the other hand we have posts like this. It's like the "not all men" comments. No one said it was all TRAs but your reaction is very telling. Your community is built on misogyny and none of you are willing to call it out when you see it.

ViolasandViolets · 20/04/2025 15:04

But trans women are actually men, and they offend at the same rate as other men. This includes violent crime, and crimes of a sexual nature. Statistically, they are as much of a threat to women as any other man.

When it comes to sex offences this is not true. Men who identify as women are actually much more likely to sexually offend than other men (cf census). Statistically they are more of a threat to women than other men.

krustykittens · 20/04/2025 15:04

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:56

No they didn’t. They said for the purposes of interpreting language under the equality act “woman” means biological female, and “sex” means biological “sex”. As far as I understand but I may be wrong as I confess I haven’t read the full 88 page judgement yet- they did not define biological sex.

Edited

It was explained it on page 3 of the judgement.

literallyarabbit · 20/04/2025 15:04

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:53

they absolutely do not want to erase women.

If the law can't define what a woman is, then yes, women are erased. That's the whole modus operandi and what TRAs are aiming for.

So yes, they do want to erase women. See also the word cis. By referring to biological women as CISwomen, that's making them a subset of their own biolobigal class so transwomen can claim women as their own. This is a huge part of TWAW and why it was so important for the word women to be defined in law.

Hope that helps.

SeedyHotel · 20/04/2025 15:05

Tandora · 20/04/2025 15:01

It’s a really complex question. I’d be happy to discuss this as with many other subjects, but there’s no place for a civilised conversation when people just keep insisting that transwomen are men and that stating otherwise is a conspiracy to destroy women. If that is the level of where the conversation is it’s impossible to have a reasonable discussion about policy.

What are they though if not men?

I’m a woman. Can I be a trans woman? Why not?
What do you have to be in order to be a trans woman?

juldan · 20/04/2025 15:05

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:06

The science is not very simple at all. If you think it is that should be your first red flag.

But it really is with regards to sex. A person born with vagina - woman. A person born with a penis- man. This is science. Every other take on this particular aspect of science is ideology, not science.

EasternStandard · 20/04/2025 15:05

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:58

I’m not relying on it as a “get out” of anything. I find it curious and important.

Yes but you’ve misunderstood.

Biological sex in the judgement isn’t your interpretation.

If you’re relying on that to keep single sex spaces as they are it won’t do it. They will only be for women (not your definition of women).

CheeseeesyWotsits · 20/04/2025 15:05

If trans women were real women they would understand our point of view, our concerns, our fears.

KateShugakIsALegend · 20/04/2025 15:06

Tandora · 20/04/2025 13:47

The type of fascism that is taking hold has nothing to do with science.

I have explained the science over and over again on anti-trans threads on mumsnet , very few people are interested in reading or engaging with it.

OP, it is almost as if you are not interested in reading or engaging with my request.

Third time lucky.....

Please can you share the science, which I assume sets out how I, a woman who has gone through periods, pregnancy, C-section, hysterectomy and menopause, am the same as a human who has is so mentally troubled that they have had surgery to remove their healthy penis and testicles and implant fake breasts?

I am interested to read and engage.

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2025 15:07

CheeseeesyWotsits · 20/04/2025 15:05

If trans women were real women they would understand our point of view, our concerns, our fears.

They have absolutely no interest in any of that. They want womem to STFU and let them ride rough shod over them - incels that they are.

literallyarabbit · 20/04/2025 15:07

Tandora · 20/04/2025 15:01

It’s a really complex question. I’d be happy to discuss this as with many other subjects, but there’s no place for a civilised conversation when people just keep insisting that transwomen are men and that stating otherwise is a conspiracy to destroy women. If that is the level of where the conversation is it’s impossible to have a reasonable discussion about policy.

Please, answer the question. I really. want to be educated!

Thank you 😘

VickyEadieofThigh · 20/04/2025 15:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'd get this awful racist comment deleted if I were you.

BertieBottsEveryFlavourBeans · 20/04/2025 15:07

Tandora · 20/04/2025 11:54

The point is that you are completely wrong about that and it is deeply oppressive to try to enforce policies that say so.

How was that post completely wrong? Transwomen are biological males, that is a fact whether you like it or not.

namechangeGOT · 20/04/2025 15:08

Munkyfuzzable · 20/04/2025 12:46

Sex and gender are NOT the same thing. There are more than two sexes (male, female and intersex etc) and gender is merely a social construct designed to put human beings in specific boxes and designate ‘traits’ to each gender in order to oppress and elevate one over the other. Men deigned to offload particular ‘duties’ to one sex over the other so they didn’t have to partake. One is no more suited to housework or parenting than the other, it’s just that one takes the time to learn and doesn’t benefit from free labour that has been deemed inferior to paid work. As such, gender is absolutely not binary because traits such as ‘feminine’ and ‘masculine’ are human traits.
Trans people are born in the wrong body, they feel and know it and there are scientific studies that indicate this occurs in utero. Identifying as another sex, other than the one you’re born with, is of no threat to anyone else.
Why are you not using your energy to protest the unbelievable levels of harassment, violence, misogyny and murders perpetrated by cis men? Trans women are in the absolute minority as perpetrators of such violence.
Oh and as you’re so intent on reinforcing this ridiculous court ruling, I’m sure you’ll be more than welcoming to trans men in the women’s toilets, as they’ve been deemed ‘biological women’ and therefore have the right to use this space too - legally and according to you!

Firstly, I never mentioned ‘gender’. I mentioned sex.

I’m asking you and @tandora and all the rest of you people so adamant that TWAW to show me the irrefutable proof, the scientific fact that a person born with XY chromosomes, the exact chromosomes that make them male, that give them their male body and their male hormones can become a female (a person with XX chromosomes). How, how do they do that? How does a Male with XY chromosomes all of a sudden become a Female with XX chromosomes. Answer it. The truth is, you can’t. Because it cannot be done.

and yes, women (because that’s what they are) who ‘identify’ as men are more than welcome in the toilets with me - because, they are women.

As for using my energy to protest the harassment, violence, misogyny and murders perpetrated by men (no such thing as CIS - unless you’d like me to use the prefix of ‘fake’ when talking about transwomen?) I do. And that’s why it’s so important to include this as part of that protesting and campaigning.

So, getting back to my original point before you tried to ‘word soup’ us all - tell me where the science is that a Male can become a Female - biologically.

ViolasandViolets · 20/04/2025 15:08

but there’s no place for a civilised conversation when people just keep insisting that transwomen are men and that stating otherwise is a conspiracy to destroy women.

How do they differ from men?

What word would you use to describe women that excludes them?

krustykittens · 20/04/2025 15:08

FlirtsWithRhinos · 20/04/2025 15:04

True. They want to erase the legal existence of female people as a distinct single sex legal and social group called "women", and replace that with a mixed sex group based on feeling that would be called "women" instead. "Women" woudl still exist but the actual people would be different.

But here is the trick and the tell... they want the original group to carry on doing what they always did being female-bodied women in single sex spaces even though their spaces are now mixed sex and their identity as female has been delegitimised, so that the trans women's fantasy of womanhood is still there for them to inhabit.

It's not enough to tell us we have to include them, the TRA version of trans acceptance also requires that we are not allowed to leave, to say "oh ok, if that is what a woman is, turns out I'm not one, I'll just go and set up something for female-bodied people somewhere else" because even though they do not accept womanhood is female bodied, they also do not accept female bodied people defining themselves as simply female outside genderist roles.

Once you see it you can't unsee it. TW need us to accept the definition of women as not because of sex to let them in, but carry on behaving as if it was so the place they wanted to get in to continues to exist.

Brilliant post! You can't see me, but I am giving you a standing ovation!

PastIsAnotherCountry · 20/04/2025 15:08

For anyone fairly new to this, the SC affirmed and suggested what MNetters have been proposing from 2016 and earlier.

Just saying one of the remaining Spartacus threads.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/2716595-TransAgenda-BullShit-The-I-am-Spartacus-Thread?latest=0

ohdearagain2 · 20/04/2025 15:08

VanishingVision · 20/04/2025 14:59

I'd like to add to the points raised here: I personally after alot of thought welcome the ruling. I'm upset that the 'debate' had to become so vile but honestly I found it to be a relief. I was hoping that we would see some clarity and peace but clearly TRAs have decided that a line in the sand has been drawn and I do not support the actions at this protest. They of course have every right to a protest, but the images I've seen have just perpetuated the TRA violence and misogyny that they claim doesn't exist and I genuinely take everything in the media with a hefty dose of salt. I know this doesn't represent all trans people but it doesn't exactly paint a good picture. I don't want the ruling reversed providing trans people are protected in law from discrimination, abuse and harassment.

Trans women are not biological women, trans women are trans women i.e transsexuals and trans man are also transsexuals. The odd trans woman/man using the opposite sex toilet once in a while was likely a workaround that maybe worked for a while in a way, but that has since spilled into a massive overreach that was genuinely caused pain and hurt to women's rights (and women themselves) over the years but it has also failed trans people, whilst enabled misogynistic and violent opportunist men.

Third spaces, where possible are needed. Not everywhere can provide but that's unfortunate. If third spaces were available readily in gyms, swimming pools etc I would actuslly use those places. I don't want to get changed around anyone, men or women. The ruling about single sex spaces does not prevent us from participating in society, providing we are protected In law. This is my perspective as a trans woman.

Edited

VanishingVision I salute you. I have desperately wanted someone from the transcommunity to understand that women just want to protect the most vulnerable in society as well as their rights. I genuinely hope for you and others in the transcommunity that as a society we can support you to also get to a place where you can feel safe and live your life the way you choose free from prejudice.

Totallymessed · 20/04/2025 15:09

I'm always impressed by how patient a lot of MNs are when faced with TRAs and their endless stream of unscientific drivel. The OP thinks refusing to say that transwomen are women is oppression. When someone is so completely lacking in any kind of perspective, or any ability to look at a situation from someone else's pov, then discussions will always be futile.

There's a saying: you can't reason someone out of an opinion they haven't reasoned into.

The fact that @Tandora said that women's consent to having transwomen in their spaces is irrelevant, marks them out as just another misogynist in the sea of misogynists pissing out their hatred of women all over the internet today.

@Tandora will never have any respect for women.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.