Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trans protest- sharing for balance

1000 replies

Tandora · 20/04/2025 11:47

There’s a thread sharing some really awful images from the protest, so I wanted to share some positive ones for the sake of some perspective/ balance.
A lot of people are really understandably incredibly angry and overwhelmed by the events of the last few days. But most people who support trans rights absolutely don’t condone fighting oppression and injustice with misogyny.

Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Alondra · 20/04/2025 14:34

ThatCyanCat · 20/04/2025 14:24

No, men do naturally have a small amount of breast tissue. It's not common for them to get breast cancer but it can happen. They're still men.

Edited

Breast cancer in men accounts for 1% of the Australian population and of that 1%, many cases happened because of radiation therapy.

Are you seriously trying to compare the rates of breast cancer in women to males to make a point in favour of trans?

Wheresthebeach · 20/04/2025 14:35

MyNameIsX · 20/04/2025 14:32

The Supreme Court ruling was the right one.

The protestors need to live with the ruling, and move on with their lives.

Simples.

Absolutely! TRAs have been threatening women for years. The violence and misogyny is male.

TheCatsTongue · 20/04/2025 14:35

VickyEadieofThigh · 20/04/2025 14:31

Absolute nonsense. A dear male friend - who had taken zero oestrogen and wasn't remotely trans - goy breast cancer and died from it. Please stick to facts.

2% of breast cancer occurs in biological males as all human have breast tissue. Being trans heightens a MtF's risk of breast cancer due to heightened oestrogen, but as you correctly say males (who are not trans) are still at risk of it.

CrossPurposes · 20/04/2025 14:35

Tandora · 20/04/2025 12:09

They are protesting against women's sex based rights.

They are protesting fascism.

Edited

How many women there are in the UK times no. Knowing that sex trumps gender is not fascism.

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:35

aylis · 20/04/2025 14:25

Actually the only people who have demonstrably cared about trans men are women who have wanted to ensure that they still have their rights, including to healthcare, upheld as the females they are, and to access to the correct services instead of having self harm, anorexia, trauma, sexual abuse and confusion about sexuality funneled into a gender service with one pathway.

You care about trans men’s access to healthcare do you?

OP posts:
thisannoyedwoman · 20/04/2025 14:36

This doesn’t make any sense. “Sex is not binary” but it literally is. It’s not even an opinion, it’s a fact. Gender is not binary, correct, and you can present however you like whether you’re a man or a woman. But you’re still a man or a woman. I’m actually wondering if a lot of TRAs are illiterate or struggle with reading comprehension?

NotmeMother · 20/04/2025 14:36

How do we erase transwomen? Is it clapping or blowing out candles. How many can one person erase or is it only one each?

Asking for a friend obviously!

SeedyHotel · 20/04/2025 14:37

Sex is binary.
Trans women are men.
No lesbian accepts TW as lesbians because men cannot be lesbians.

Any and all men are predatory if they’re trying to get into women’s single sex spaces.
TW retain male patterns of behaviour, perfectly demonstrated by the attack on feminists at one of their protests.

I’m so sick of hearing that TWAW, when everything about them is male. Their vibe, their smell, the fucking awful way they treat women when women say no, the way they trample all over women, and the way they’ve groomed so many women to believe everything they say. It’s sickening and so fucking stupid of anyone to believe.

pirateshirt · 20/04/2025 14:37

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:35

You care about trans men’s access to healthcare do you?

Why are you being so haughty and superior about this?

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2025 14:37

andtheworldrollson · 20/04/2025 14:30

So transowmen have always existed but they can’t exist in a society that is arranged around the biological definition of man and woman - so they have never existed until now ?

🤪

literallyarabbit · 20/04/2025 14:38

Ahh, it's a Tandora thread 😂🤦🏻‍♀️

Sex absolutely is binary.

In the Supreme Court rules, transpeople haven't lost any rights. All it did was clarify the meaning of woman in law. (And this is why many women were celebrating, because they wear right that under law, sex is absolutely biological.

And of course trans live matter, no-one is saying otherwise.

In order to be a transwoman, you have to be a biological man. That's just the facts, biological fact in fact!

To be clearl, I have no issues with transpeople and know they exist and have always done so. It's more TRAs I can't abide. They're the ones causing so much mess and bitterness.

Hope that helps.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/04/2025 14:38

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

So the first paragraph says you don't object to the judgement (which states that women's single sex spaces must be respected and protected.

But the second one says than banning trans women from all single sex women's spaces makes us fascists!

Genuine question but what is your objection to a third and fourth space for both trans men and women of their own. Or does come under your unique definition of fascism too?

LaMontser · 20/04/2025 14:38

If only these very sad men could reframe their trauma; surely they’d be able to move on…

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:38

NotmeMother · 20/04/2025 14:36

How do we erase transwomen? Is it clapping or blowing out candles. How many can one person erase or is it only one each?

Asking for a friend obviously!

If you insist that transwomen are men , you are denying, erasing their existence as trans people. If you organise society on the basis of that belief , and enforce it, you make it impossible for trans people to live as trans people.

OP posts:
ZoeCM · 20/04/2025 14:38

OP, I haven't read the full thread, so I apologise if someone has already has asked this - but if sex is not binary, how many gametes are there? I'm only aware of two types - eggs and sperm.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/04/2025 14:38

@SeedyHotel 🎯

thisannoyedwoman · 20/04/2025 14:39

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:38

If you insist that transwomen are men , you are denying, erasing their existence as trans people. If you organise society on the basis of that belief , and enforce it, you make it impossible for trans people to live as trans people.

Trans women are by law and biological fact men who identify as women. That’s not erasure. It’s stating a fact.

Scentbird · 20/04/2025 14:39

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:38

If you insist that transwomen are men , you are denying, erasing their existence as trans people. If you organise society on the basis of that belief , and enforce it, you make it impossible for trans people to live as trans people.

No, ignoring the fact that transwomen are men is erasing their existence.

trying to redefine what a woman is so that you can claim transwomen are women is erasing trans women. And women.

VickyEadieofThigh · 20/04/2025 14:40

Alondra · 20/04/2025 14:34

Breast cancer in men accounts for 1% of the Australian population and of that 1%, many cases happened because of radiation therapy.

Are you seriously trying to compare the rates of breast cancer in women to males to make a point in favour of trans?

I certainly wasn't. But stating that trans-identifying men - because they're men - don't get breast cancer isn't true. That the instances of male breast cancer are far fewer than those of female doesn't mean the original statement was true.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 20/04/2025 14:40

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:35

You care about trans men’s access to healthcare do you?

I care about access to healthcare for all human beings, regardless of how they like to dress or what they like to call themselves. And that includes mental health support for men and women who are confused about their "gender identity".

Contrary to what you might think, I don't hate trans people or wish them any ill at all. I think they should be protected and supported. I just don't think that the best way of doing that is by pretending that they are something that we know that they are not.

TheCatsTongue · 20/04/2025 14:40

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:35

You care about trans men’s access to healthcare do you?

What is the definition of "healthcare" here?

Is anyone advocating for trans people to be blocked from receiving dental care, vaccinations, cancer treatment etc? No.

Now cosmetic procedures such as breast augmentation is not healthcare (unless if falls under the remit of reconstruction due to cancer), and no male or female should be receiving that on the NHS (unless due to cancer).

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/04/2025 14:41

pirateshirt · 20/04/2025 14:37

Why are you being so haughty and superior about this?

Channel your inner Michelle Obama... when they go low, we go high.

Snorlaxo · 20/04/2025 14:41

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:38

If you insist that transwomen are men , you are denying, erasing their existence as trans people. If you organise society on the basis of that belief , and enforce it, you make it impossible for trans people to live as trans people.

Why doesn’t the phrase “transwomen are women” erase their existence as trans people ?
Why don’t you say that “transwomen are transwomen “ instead ?

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:41

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/04/2025 14:38

So the first paragraph says you don't object to the judgement (which states that women's single sex spaces must be respected and protected.

But the second one says than banning trans women from all single sex women's spaces makes us fascists!

Genuine question but what is your objection to a third and fourth space for both trans men and women of their own. Or does come under your unique definition of fascism too?

Genuine question but what is your objection to a third and fourth space for both trans men and women of their own.

Because trans people need to be included and integrated into society , not othered and outed and siloed in their engagement with basic public services. It’s totally disproportionate to say that trans people can never participate in gendered spaces in accordance with their gender. This will make society intolerable for the vast majority of trans people.

OP posts:
Totallymessed · 20/04/2025 14:41

Around the world there are brave people fighting oppression. In Iran, women are killed for refusing to wear a headscarf. In Russia people are sent to gulags for criticising Putin. In Afghanistan, women face death for working as a midwife.

In the UK, we have thousands of furious man children having meltdowns and saying they're being genocided- because they've been told they'll need to use the gent's for a pee.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.