Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trans protest- sharing for balance

1000 replies

Tandora · 20/04/2025 11:47

There’s a thread sharing some really awful images from the protest, so I wanted to share some positive ones for the sake of some perspective/ balance.
A lot of people are really understandably incredibly angry and overwhelmed by the events of the last few days. But most people who support trans rights absolutely don’t condone fighting oppression and injustice with misogyny.

Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
Trans protest- sharing for balance
OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Riaanna · 20/04/2025 14:13

Alondra · 20/04/2025 14:13

Biology is a science. It studies our bodies - genes, molecular structure, organs and ecosystems and how they interact with each other. Male and females not only have different organs but also hormones

A trans woman can't get breast cancer.
A trans woman can't get ovarian cancer
A trans woman can't get cervical cancer
A trans woman doesn't have a vagina
A trans woman doesn't produce eggs
A trans woman doesn't have fallopian tubs
A trans woman can't give birth/have serious health complications from pregnancy or die because of those complications.

A trans woman can get prostate cancer, which biological women will never get.

Enough 101 biology for you?

Pity you started with breast cancer. Because they can.

BreatheAndFocus · 20/04/2025 14:14

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:02

There was a lengthy one on a thread just yesterday about this judgement . Only one person engaged to say “yawn, don’t you have anything better to do, we’re not interested” or words to that effect.

Then link me and I’ll read it. It probably won’t be today because of Easter and the Bank Hol, but I will look if you link me to what you’re talking about.

You mentioned an interplay of sex and gender previously. To be clear, I’m saying that no human can change sex and that a TW doesn’t change sex when they transition - because it’s not possible for them to do so.

GoatsareGOAT · 20/04/2025 14:14

It's got nothing to do with your consent

As I teach my children people who don't accept your no are not safe to be around

Trans protest- sharing for balance
ThatCyanCat · 20/04/2025 14:14

Alondra · 20/04/2025 14:13

Biology is a science. It studies our bodies - genes, molecular structure, organs and ecosystems and how they interact with each other. Male and females not only have different organs but also hormones

A trans woman can't get breast cancer.
A trans woman can't get ovarian cancer
A trans woman can't get cervical cancer
A trans woman doesn't have a vagina
A trans woman doesn't produce eggs
A trans woman doesn't have fallopian tubs
A trans woman can't give birth/have serious health complications from pregnancy or die because of those complications.

A trans woman can get prostate cancer, which biological women will never get.

Enough 101 biology for you?

Small correction - transwomen can get breast cancer, as men do have some breast tissue. Less common than in women but it does happen. The rest is true, and your point, obviously, still stands.

Pluvia · 20/04/2025 14:14

"Only men could oppress women for thousands of years, then turn around, put on a dress, and complain that they are the most marginalized group in society."
Kara Dansky

Name5 · 20/04/2025 14:14

Tandora you've asked for balance on mumsnet so I'm going to give you some.

Trans people have not lost anything by this ruling it has just clarified the law that some (loads) of institutions choose to ignore.
My cards are I have a trans adult child. You and I have shared posts before.
Scotland was particularly effected by piss taking (pun intended) by TRA. I'm in the rural south of England so we do not suffer so much by mob rule.

I have worked with trans people for over forty years and I really couldn't care less what they wear or call their selves. But you must understand the narrative that was pushed by Stonewall and it's 'friends'. It has effected thousands of women and children. This is not a female friendly organisation who don't even understand lesbianism. Why? Because they are men centric.
We are a mix heritage family and have many friends who cannot have their safe spaces compromised. Equality is not at the expense of these women. I don't care if a TW pees next to me but if you give me cause for concern I'm going to shout like hell and I'm scared of noone.
The trans community would do better to campaign for third spaces in shops and malls. Higher education establishments and public spaces already have them as do new builds. You know this.
No body has lost the fight, the Supreme Court has just reminded people that the threats (in employment etc) and pressures to biological women are unlawful.
As I say to my daughter you choose to be a trans person but you are still my daughter and a women. She doesn't disagree because she is both kind and intelligent. I will always stand up for trans people and those on FWR know that but don't use this ruling in bad faith. It does more harm than good.

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Scentbird · 20/04/2025 14:09

So trans women aren’t women then?

If there’s some instances they can’t be treated as women, they aren’t women.

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

OP posts:
Allergictoironing · 20/04/2025 14:14

Tandora · 20/04/2025 13:58

Well your perspective is much more nuanced than most and I appreciate you for that.

Unfortunately what you will not appreciate is where I feel that line needs to be! Somewhere waaay different to where you seem to think it should be, which seems to be right towards the "if you haz wimmins feelz you're a woman" end.

I disagree with transwomen taking part in female sports, from the simple fact that once they have passed puberty they have near enough all the advantages of a man even if they do have testosterone suppression. I feel women's spaces such as rape centres, gynaecology examinations, changing rooms & toilets, prisons etc should only allow fully transitioned transwomen in, and then only if the biological woman is OK with it. I feel women who have been traumatised by men shouldn't have to use a male doctor or counsellor. I feel women who belong to religions which say only another woman can treat them should be able to have only a biological woman to treat them.

And I strongly believe that anyone who claims to be a "transwoman" then states things like "rape them with my lady dick", that people who insist that lesbians who don't want to have sex with a penis inserted by someone physically male must be "transphobic", or anyone who advocates violence to women purely because they don't agree, have given up any right to ever be considered to be a "transwoman" or any type of woman as long as they live.

NextRinny · 20/04/2025 14:15

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:07

You want me to say it again?

it’s got nothing to do with your consent.

You don’t get to consent or not to the reality of someone else’s existence

You also don't get to consent to the reality of the single sex class of female.

It exists with or without your approval.

No one born male belongs to it irrespective of who approves or disapproves.

EasternStandard · 20/04/2025 14:16

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:07

You want me to say it again?

it’s got nothing to do with your consent.

You don’t get to consent or not to the reality of someone else’s existence

‘You want me to say it again’

What’s with this squaring off.

Look we could have continued to say yes but it’s a no. And the law is finally changing thanks to the Supreme Court ruling.

Voters will vote on this and politicians will react. I know you started the thread to say look at these ‘positive’ placards. Your posts aren’t helping your cause. They have been offensive and deeply oppressive at times with the fascism and patriarchy one.

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 20/04/2025 14:16

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:05

Obviously it depends on the context. For example - the provision of medical services need to be tailored to treat different people’s different bodies

Again thank you for your response. So we agree that medical treatment for a Trans Woman would be tied into a male medical model (prostate checks etc).
I'm genuinely interested to know though what social differences you think could or should be applied. So, for example, do you think that Trans women should be allowed to compete in female sporting categories, and do you think that a trans women offender should be held in a female prison?
Also do you think that there is any difference between trans women who have undergone medical transitioning and those who haven't?

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:16

Allergictoironing · 20/04/2025 14:14

Unfortunately what you will not appreciate is where I feel that line needs to be! Somewhere waaay different to where you seem to think it should be, which seems to be right towards the "if you haz wimmins feelz you're a woman" end.

I disagree with transwomen taking part in female sports, from the simple fact that once they have passed puberty they have near enough all the advantages of a man even if they do have testosterone suppression. I feel women's spaces such as rape centres, gynaecology examinations, changing rooms & toilets, prisons etc should only allow fully transitioned transwomen in, and then only if the biological woman is OK with it. I feel women who have been traumatised by men shouldn't have to use a male doctor or counsellor. I feel women who belong to religions which say only another woman can treat them should be able to have only a biological woman to treat them.

And I strongly believe that anyone who claims to be a "transwoman" then states things like "rape them with my lady dick", that people who insist that lesbians who don't want to have sex with a penis inserted by someone physically male must be "transphobic", or anyone who advocates violence to women purely because they don't agree, have given up any right to ever be considered to be a "transwoman" or any type of woman as long as they live.

Well I thought you were reasonable based on your last post. Then you said this and proved me wrong;
"if you haz wimmins feelz you're a woman" end.
Shame.

OP posts:
PastIsAnotherCountry · 20/04/2025 14:17

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:11

I don’t know what you mean when you say that but I always find it creepy

I have done you the courtesy of an advanced search to audit your science claims.

I read a bunch of assertions and claims that show that you borrowed your‘ ‘science’ from unreliable sources.

Your choice of course.

aylis · 20/04/2025 14:17

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

The definition of female is very well established.

Riaanna · 20/04/2025 14:17

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

Can you explain the biological differences between man and trans woman?

ThatPearlFish · 20/04/2025 14:18

I'm wondering what's going to happen if trans men now use female spaces. I keep reading on here that trans men can pass much more easily than trans women and that they are most welcome in women's spaces.. So isn't it going to be a bit of an invitation to men with nefarious intentions to enter women's spaces and claim to be a trans man? How is anyone going to know who is who? Many trans men look extremely male, it's very hard to tell. How are they going to prove it?

Riaanna · 20/04/2025 14:18

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

They aren’t the same in any aspect.

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2025 14:19

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

This is like incel-speak 🫠

Weirdedoot · 20/04/2025 14:19

Tandora · 20/04/2025 11:54

The point is that you are completely wrong about that and it is deeply oppressive to try to enforce policies that say so.

Can you explain the differences? And also explain the nature of the oppression?

WearyAuldWumman · 20/04/2025 14:19

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:07

You want me to say it again?

it’s got nothing to do with your consent.

You don’t get to consent or not to the reality of someone else’s existence

Everyone in this world exists.

No one can be coerced, however, into believing the delusions of others.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 20/04/2025 14:19

Riaanna · 20/04/2025 14:10

I think we have a man in our midst.

Unfortunately delusion isn’t sex specific. There’s a few women on my socials (not close friends luckily) who are harping on about trans women being women and disagreeing is akin to demanding trans genocide. A lot women will always, always put men front of centre regardless. Quite depressing.

Allergictoironing · 20/04/2025 14:20

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:14

Trans women are women. Are they exactly the same in all aspects as cis women? No. Are there circumstances in which it might be legitimate to treat these groups differently due to physical (or potentially other ) differences ? Yes.
In so far as this is all the judgement said then I don’t object to the judgement.

But the way that the judgement has been interpreted as mandating the exclusion of trans women - and anyone who doesn’t conform to some unspecified definition of “biological female” - from all women’s spaces- is a dangerous new variety of fascism.

Edited

I've also noticed that just about all your rhetoric, and that I've heard about the "non-violent" protests and in fact all the loud comments previously, are only ever about transwomen never transmen.

I never hear of transmen threatening to stuff a barbed wire covered truncheon up the arse of a man to punish them, or to stab them for their views, or to hope they get burned in a grease fire, or anything like that.

It also seems strange that there is such a massive imbalance between the numbers of men wanting to transition to women vs women wanting to transition to men, and most especially when the transitions are in name/actions only & without surgery. Can you link us to the research that looks into that?

Tandora · 20/04/2025 14:20

Riaanna · 20/04/2025 14:18

They aren’t the same in any aspect.

well this is completely false isn’t it?

OP posts:
aylis · 20/04/2025 14:20

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2025 14:19

This is like incel-speak 🫠

Isn't it? There's no difference at all.

MRA 🤝 TRA.

andtheworldrollson · 20/04/2025 14:20

Of course transowmen are not women !

the only thing that unites and is common to all women is the chromosome stuff which leads to the genitals

it’s the only thing - you can’t find a single other thing that unites women can you? Slow hand clap whilst we wait for that answer

or perhaps we should start chanting “ why are we waiting “

take that away as the definition and you don’t have women or men so transgender people would have defined themselves out of existing-

( oh and please don’t be so unkind as to drag chromosomes disorders into this because transpeople don’t have them)

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread