Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think you should never cohabit with a man unless he’s paying the majority of the bills?

685 replies

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 13:47

Split finances = split energy.

OP posts:
vodkaredbullgirl · 19/04/2025 14:21

Think someone has hit the gin bottle too early 😆

NeuroSpicyCat · 19/04/2025 14:22

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:19

If a man genuinely wants to take the lead at home - emotionally, practically, domestically - and does so consistently and with intention, then yes, I think it’s fair for him to earn less. For me, it’s less about who earns more and more about who’s leading and what they’re bringing to the table. I value masculine provision but I also value complimentary energy - not two people trying to be the same. The problem is, most of the time women are holding down both: the emotional labour and half the bills.

what do you mean by “emotional labour”?

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:22

NeuroSpicyCat · 19/04/2025 14:14

“emotional labour… and keeping the relationship connected”

What do these mean?

Emotional labour is the work of managing feelings - your own and other people’s. That includes things like remembering birthdays, smoothing over tensions, checking in after a bad day, planning meaningful time together, and noticing when something’s off and taking the lead to fix it.

Keeping the relationship connected means tending to the emotional health of the relationship - making sure it doesn’t go cold, distant, or transactional. In a lot of relationships, it’s the women who initiate difficult conversations, plan quality time, handle emotional check-ins and carry the mental load of keeping things emotionally stable.

OP posts:
Watermill · 19/04/2025 14:23

You keep posting, but it still doesn’t make any sense…

MidnightPatrol · 19/04/2025 14:23

You sound like you think the world owes you a living tbh.

What would happen if this ‘provider’ became ill and couldn’t work any more?

DecafDodger · 19/04/2025 14:23

Was the ChatGPT prompt on purpose to make your posts sound like straight out of manosphere reddit?
masculine provider energy, leading in a relationship and what one is bringing to a table are expressions that no woman has used ever.

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:24

PowderMonkeys · 19/04/2025 14:14

Or you’re fantasising pathetically about a Big,Strong Man sweeping you off your tiny, pwincessy feet with the words ‘There, there — don’t worry your pretty little head about anything’…?

Grow up, OP.

It’s always interesting how quickly a woman expressing a preference for masculine leadership gets reduced to a “pwincess” fantasy. What I described isn’t about helplessness - it’s about polarity, contribution, and mutual respect. But if it makes you feel better to mock it, go ahead. Still doesn’t make it any less valid.

OP posts:
SunnyViper · 19/04/2025 14:24

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 13:57

Because I believe in masculine provider energy and I’m not looking to split hairs or bills. If I’m showing up emotionally, practically, and often doing more of the invisible labour that keeps a household running, I don’t think it’s wild to expect financial leadership in return. It’s about alignment. Some of us just don’t want a 50/50 roommate dynamic in our relationships.

Edited

What bollocks

Crazybaby123 · 19/04/2025 14:25

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:00

Because “fair” doesn’t always mean “equal in numbers.” In many relationships, women are already contributing more in emotional labour, home management, caregiving, and keeping the relationship connected. If the man is also paying exactly half - who’s really carrying more weight?

I’m not against balance. I just don’t believe identical roles = healthy dynamics. Some of us value traditional masculine provision - not out of weakness but because we bring a different kind of strength.

It's not traditional, the shift towards patriarchal society was introduced during the bronze age during the agricultural rise and male strength became more useful to pull plows. But now noone needs to pull a plow by hand, so we don't need the patriarchy.

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:26

arethereanyleftatall · 19/04/2025 14:17

You realise absolutely no one so far has agreed with you op?

I’m aware and I’m okay with that. Not everything needs to be posted for agreement. Sometimes it’s just about saying the thing out loud that others are thinking but won’t say. I knew it would be unpopular, that doesn’t make it untrue.

OP posts:
SunnyViper · 19/04/2025 14:26

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:22

Emotional labour is the work of managing feelings - your own and other people’s. That includes things like remembering birthdays, smoothing over tensions, checking in after a bad day, planning meaningful time together, and noticing when something’s off and taking the lead to fix it.

Keeping the relationship connected means tending to the emotional health of the relationship - making sure it doesn’t go cold, distant, or transactional. In a lot of relationships, it’s the women who initiate difficult conversations, plan quality time, handle emotional check-ins and carry the mental load of keeping things emotionally stable.

I totally disagree and it’s responsibility of both to engage emotionally. Everything you state is the absolute minimum I would expect in a partner.

ShanghaiDiva · 19/04/2025 14:27

In 33 years of marriage I have never handled an emotional check in - what utter guff.

Charlize43 · 19/04/2025 14:29

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 13:57

Because I believe in masculine provider energy and I’m not looking to split hairs or bills. If I’m showing up emotionally, practically, and often doing more of the invisible labour that keeps a household running, I don’t think it’s wild to expect financial leadership in return. It’s about alignment. Some of us just don’t want a 50/50 roommate dynamic in our relationships.

Edited

'masculine provider energy'. sounds so retro.

Are you one of these 'rinsers' that I was reading about online that expects a man to take you out for a luxury meal and drinks at a top restaurant and then give you an expensive Cartier jewellery piece because you think you are special and worth it?

Good luck with that.

MidnightPatrol · 19/04/2025 14:29

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:24

It’s always interesting how quickly a woman expressing a preference for masculine leadership gets reduced to a “pwincess” fantasy. What I described isn’t about helplessness - it’s about polarity, contribution, and mutual respect. But if it makes you feel better to mock it, go ahead. Still doesn’t make it any less valid.

It sounds like you want a man to fund your lifestyle tbh.

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:29

MidnightPatrol · 19/04/2025 14:23

You sound like you think the world owes you a living tbh.

What would happen if this ‘provider’ became ill and couldn’t work any more?

Not at all, I don’t think the world owes me anything. I just believe in complimentary roles where each person brings their strengths. If a provide became ill, the dynamics would shift - just like in any committed relationship. Support isn’t a one-way street. But a setback doesn’t cancel out the standard - it just reveals whether the relationship is built on genuine care or convenience.

OP posts:
DefinitelyMaybe92 · 19/04/2025 14:29

And what if the woman earns more???

ilovesooty · 19/04/2025 14:30

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 13:57

Because I believe in masculine provider energy and I’m not looking to split hairs or bills. If I’m showing up emotionally, practically, and often doing more of the invisible labour that keeps a household running, I don’t think it’s wild to expect financial leadership in return. It’s about alignment. Some of us just don’t want a 50/50 roommate dynamic in our relationships.

Edited

masculine provider energy 🤣

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:31

DecafDodger · 19/04/2025 14:23

Was the ChatGPT prompt on purpose to make your posts sound like straight out of manosphere reddit?
masculine provider energy, leading in a relationship and what one is bringing to a table are expressions that no woman has used ever.

Or maybe it just sounds unfamiliar because women are finally putting language to what we’ve felt for a long time without sugarcoating it. Masculine provision and emotional polarity aren’t exclusive to the manosphere - they’re values many women hold. We’ve just been taught not to speak about them without apology. If that sounds “too polished” or uncomfortable, maybe that says more about the listener than the speaker.

OP posts:
TasWair · 19/04/2025 14:32

Your idea of what "masculine energy" actually means is harmful. Men do not have to take the lead, they do not have to be passive in the labour they do within the home and in caring roles within their families. Being an active and equal partner and giving their partner the freedom of equality can be a very masculine, positive energy. What you're proposing is to uphold toxic masculinity within households, putting a lot of pressure on both men and women to be a certain way, thus causing frustration and resentment from both.
I hope you meet better men, OP.

arcticpandas · 19/04/2025 14:32

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:29

Not at all, I don’t think the world owes me anything. I just believe in complimentary roles where each person brings their strengths. If a provide became ill, the dynamics would shift - just like in any committed relationship. Support isn’t a one-way street. But a setback doesn’t cancel out the standard - it just reveals whether the relationship is built on genuine care or convenience.

Oh Elon, are you recruiting mummies in the UK now?

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 19/04/2025 14:33

What a weird concept. When I was working pt and dh ft, I did more of the domestic load and he paid more of the bills. Now we are paid almost exactly the same and both work ft, we share the bills and the domestic load equally. It's not rocket science and it doesn't make us 'flatmates' Confused

Male provider 'energy' Hmm

DefinitelyMaybe92 · 19/04/2025 14:33

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 14:31

Or maybe it just sounds unfamiliar because women are finally putting language to what we’ve felt for a long time without sugarcoating it. Masculine provision and emotional polarity aren’t exclusive to the manosphere - they’re values many women hold. We’ve just been taught not to speak about them without apology. If that sounds “too polished” or uncomfortable, maybe that says more about the listener than the speaker.

Your replies smack of regurgitated social media guff.

ilovesooty · 19/04/2025 14:34

handle emotional check ins 😂

This is the best laugh I've had all day.

Pleasegodgotosleep · 19/04/2025 14:34

ThisSereneSnail · 19/04/2025 13:55

I mean that when the financial foundation isn’t solid or feels uneven, it can ripple into everything else - how supported you feel, how you show up, how emotionally safe the relationship is. “Split finances, split energy” just sums up the idea that when both people are doing the exact same thing, often nobody is fully holding it down.

Why should one person be fully holding it down? And why the man? Why wouldn't you be a team?

ExpatMum41 · 19/04/2025 14:35

Whoever makes more money should pay more.

I paid more in my first two relationships (my idea). Unfortunately, it led to them both also 'borrowing' money from me that they still owe me 20 and 17 years later respectively, but what can you do.

The third serious partner made more and subsequently paid more (his idea) but he was contradictorily an abusive arsehole about it too.

The next one made a lot more but insisted on 50-50 after the first few dates, but was also very happy to come to mine for dinner and eat steak and fresh fish (while he lived at home, gave his mummy 'keep', and the most I ever ate there was a prawn salad one day) and pretended to agree to pay towards my shopping bill the next time I was going to cook for both of us (but never did).

Now I'm happily married and my husband, who makes significantly more than I do, pays for everything (which, given that I'm now a SAHM and a housewife, only making 'parental leave' money here, is fair enough).

Swipe left for the next trending thread