Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Person with MH problems should not be better off no working

581 replies

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 16:54

Just that really. Someone working a minimum wage job full-time should not be worse off than someone not working due to mental health problems and claiming benefits.
I know several people in this situation claiming UC for housing benefit, council tax, ESA, disability top up and PIP. They all have no work record and few qualifications so would probably only get a minimum wage job. But their income would reduce. So they have a financial incentive not to recover.

OP posts:
pointythings · 13/04/2025 17:47

OK, let's do a little thought experiment here.

OP, imagine that prices are exactly the same as they are now. You are working a NMW job, but getting £5k in the bank. Your person with mental ill health is getting £6k in benefits.

You are both very comfortable.

Now do you still feel the same way about the situation?

HPFA · 13/04/2025 17:48

Youcancheck · 13/04/2025 17:09

It’s just getting tedious now with all these types of threads …
idiots making out that:

Unfair Cash! (UC)
Pretend Illness Payments! (PIP)
Looks Clearly Well/ Really Able!(LCW/LCWRA)

How can people be so bitter? It’s like a perfectly well person being jealous of someone really ill needing frequent surgeries and appointments at hospital. Yes they are getting more spent on their healthcare because they need it likewise those getting disability benefits need that extra just from a different safety net pot. Imagine being jealous of the disabled. .

Edited

There's a purpose behind these constant threads (and those on some other subjects, such as grooming gangs).

The aim is to work on the emotions of those broadly in agreement - to make them angrier and angrier - and to exhaust everyone else.

You don't engage in a proper argument, you don't admit that things are always imperfect, that issues might be complex, you just repeat the same lines over and over again.

Flytrap01 · 13/04/2025 17:48

Coconutter24 · 13/04/2025 17:46

It’s not as simple as that though is it? Companies also have bills etc to pay

well sherlock so do use workers and its a piss take that some workers need universal credit top ups.

i thought society got rid of slave labour years ago and basiclly the pittance workers get paid vs the value of the labour they produce etc workers should be paid better or society needs a new system to replace capitalism

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 17:49

Wishyouwerehere50 · 13/04/2025 17:46

I want to know why. I want to know if it's legitimately because it will dis incentivise employers to remain here. I find that hard to believe.

I find it hard to believe select corporations can't afford to pay much more and be compelled to do so. I don't understand why it isn't happening.

Some employers probably couldn’t pay more without severely impacting their ability to trade. But plenty of companies could absolutely pay more. A company like Tesco for example with billions of pounds of profit could (and should) absolutely pay more.

Myaccountismyaccount · 13/04/2025 17:49

PaintYourAssLikeRembrandt · 13/04/2025 17:08

The person on long term benefits isn't putting I towards a pension, will never get promoted, and their benefits could be removed or reduced at any second.

It's hardly the good life.

This. I'm actually physically disabled (but ill health has brought MH issues too). At 35 I was declared by the nhs pension service (and an independent doctor) that they felt I would never be expected to work again. Dismissed and given an ill health pension (the pension is deducted from my benefits entitlement). I would be on about £46000 now (without any promotions). I have a minimal pension now in my 40s but couldn't add to it. The worry of living on benefits, money being taken away is immense. The government think I'm going to be able to go back to work (not sure how). The assessment process is not fit for purpose. Each assessment has reduced my points (even though I've deteriorated). The worry everytime it comes around to reassessment is immense.
When my dc reach 18 they will have to leave home because I'll nolonger beable to afford a home the size I need to accommodate them. I won't be able to support them through university. I would not choose this way of life.
Working brings choice that living on benefits doesn't.

Anyotherdude · 13/04/2025 17:50

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:04

These are friends. Mental health problems are common you know.

Yet, you’re clearly not their friend. Where is your empathy, OP?

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:50

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 17:37

Which benefits would they lose? PIP isn’t an out of work benefit? Their UC entitlement would reduce slightly but they’d also have their wages.

I have explained this a number of times. They get benefits because their mental health is so bad. If it improves so they are able to work, they are unlikely to be eligible for PIP. Single people on national minimum wage do not get much on benefits.

OP posts:
Pictue · 13/04/2025 17:50

gamerchick · 13/04/2025 17:01

FFS give it a bloody rest.

If benefits are so attractive then go and claim them yourself instead of wishing punishment on others

I agree. Go and walk a mile in their shoes, living on what they get and tell us all how well you get on!

In fact, come and do what I do for 6 months in my caring role and tell me afterwards that you're still really envious of people with disabilities.

Incidentally, I don't claim UC. I claim Carers Allowance though and care for 4 family members with additional needs for £86/week. I then earn £150/week from what little part time work I can fit in around that. Then my kids get DLA.

I don't stop from 6am-11pm, 7 days a week. No holidays, no break...EVER! Actually, I do get a break. I get one hour a week for my hobby. Come and be jealous of this scrounger!

I challenge you to come and try my life for 6 months and NOT change your attitude!

SerendipityJane · 13/04/2025 17:51

OP forgot to mention free goats.

SalfordQuays · 13/04/2025 17:51

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 17:15

So you think that’s someone who has no control over their ability to earn a living, should be living on a bare minimum income? Why?

@Mumble12 I think OP is saying they shouldn’t get more than someone working full time. Not that they should be on bare minimum income.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 13/04/2025 17:51

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:06

I understand that.
You support someone getting more money than they would get working full time at a national minimum wage job?

Yet again, completely arse about face.

The whole problem with this "better off on Benefits" narrative is that people continually deny the actual problem, which is that employers in the UK are subsidised in order to permit them to pay a pittance in salaries.

It's not the fault of people claiming benefits, the minimum amount the government has decided they need for a minimum level of living standard, that salaries and wages in the UK are utterly abysmal.

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:52

I am sorry to hear of anyone struggling. I have worked since I was 16 and will get a tiny employee pension and state pension. Not everyone working is on high wages or getting a good pension.

OP posts:
x2boys · 13/04/2025 17:52

Livelovebehappy · 13/04/2025 17:39

You’re seriously comparing a quadriplegic with someone with mental health issues?

Have you any.idea how severe mental illness can be?

SpringIsSpringing25 · 13/04/2025 17:55

Pictue · 13/04/2025 17:50

I agree. Go and walk a mile in their shoes, living on what they get and tell us all how well you get on!

In fact, come and do what I do for 6 months in my caring role and tell me afterwards that you're still really envious of people with disabilities.

Incidentally, I don't claim UC. I claim Carers Allowance though and care for 4 family members with additional needs for £86/week. I then earn £150/week from what little part time work I can fit in around that. Then my kids get DLA.

I don't stop from 6am-11pm, 7 days a week. No holidays, no break...EVER! Actually, I do get a break. I get one hour a week for my hobby. Come and be jealous of this scrounger!

I challenge you to come and try my life for 6 months and NOT change your attitude!

I can't imagine how difficult your life must be🤗

But why have you quoted? @gamerchick

Sirzy · 13/04/2025 17:56

I work 30 hours a week now. I have diagnosed mental health issues. I feel lucky to now be well enough I can work and love my job. NOW working overall improves my MH.

However in the not to distant past I couldn’t work and my MH was part of that reason. If I had been forced to carry on working or face poverty I would have ended up with a breakdown at best, not being here at worse. Thankfully I was able to take the few years needed to get myself and my situation into a better position. I was then very lucky to have an opportunity with a very good employer to build myself back into the workforce. I am in a better place now than I have been for years.

the benefits system was part of what helped me be able to heal (or at least apply a comfy enough dressing I can cope for now!)

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 17:56

SalfordQuays · 13/04/2025 17:51

@Mumble12 I think OP is saying they shouldn’t get more than someone working full time. Not that they should be on bare minimum income.

Yes and I disagree. Someone who can’t work through no fault of their own, shouldn’t be expected to live on a basic wage. We know NMW isn’t enough to live on. Which is why those on NMW are often subsidised by UC. So why are we wanting to force disabled people to ‘survive’ on that, even though we know being disabled incurs more living costs than not being disabled?

the only people who should bring home less than a comfortable wage are those who could
work, but deliberately choose not to.

SpringIsSpringing25 · 13/04/2025 17:57

SerendipityJane · 13/04/2025 17:51

OP forgot to mention free goats.

Yeah, I have received my award, I don't qualify for any other benefits as before I became disabled I prioritised saving money over expensive holidays and whatever else.

So I'll probably have to buy my own goat as well. 🐐

ScruffMuffin · 13/04/2025 17:59

Haven't RTWT.

Had no idea I could be better off on benefits. I have multiple MH and physical health problems, two degrees, two diplomas, and work a DIFFICULT minimum-wage job, with extremely challenging children. I'm fiercely determined and fiercely independent, and will work until I literally can't get out of bed. Then I'll work from my bed.

I appreciate that I'm in a more fortunate position than some. But I could definitely claim disability benefits. I don't want to, because they need to go to people who need them more than I do.

LakieLady · 13/04/2025 18:00

ARichtGoodDram · 13/04/2025 17:31

Quite often on these threads it's interesting how the UC for housing that someone who cannot work gets is counted as their income that they're free to spend, but the UC for housing someone on minimum wage living in the same area would also get is completely ignored.

Almost like it's convenient...

And all the ire is directed at the people who get that big chunk of UC paid to them, and none to the BTL landlords who make a tidy living out of it.

Because my DB owns his home, his PIP and ESA are quite a bit less than he would get working full-time on NMW. It's the housing costs that bump up the benefit entitlement to above NMW.

LadyMary50 · 13/04/2025 18:01

MidnightPatrol · 13/04/2025 16:57

Is the person claiming the raft of benefits described above really better off than someone working 40 hours on minimum wage? They would need to take home ~£1,700 a month, which seems unlikely.

Edited

Unfortunately a lot of minimum wage jobs are zero hours contracts which means they don’t take home £1700 per month.If we are talking about serious mental illness ie.psychosis,schizophrenia etc which requires hospitalisation,medication and ongoing mental health care then many of those people will need to be supported by benefits long term.If we are talking about anxiety,adhd and depression these are not mental illnesses they are conditions which can be managed by meds and counselling.In most cases working is beneficial and can often help their condition.In one of my local charity shops(a big well known charity)they take on volunteers who have varying learning disabilities and Down’s syndrome,the difference it makes to their confidence and self esteem is amazing and they feel valued,maybe it’s time people with certain non disabling conditions should do the same.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 13/04/2025 18:03

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 16:54

Just that really. Someone working a minimum wage job full-time should not be worse off than someone not working due to mental health problems and claiming benefits.
I know several people in this situation claiming UC for housing benefit, council tax, ESA, disability top up and PIP. They all have no work record and few qualifications so would probably only get a minimum wage job. But their income would reduce. So they have a financial incentive not to recover.

Yes, because MH issues are EASILY solved aren’t they, surely they just need to get a grip don’t they?!

pointythings · 13/04/2025 18:03

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:52

I am sorry to hear of anyone struggling. I have worked since I was 16 and will get a tiny employee pension and state pension. Not everyone working is on high wages or getting a good pension.

Any chance of you answering the question I asked about 20 minutes ago?

MidnightPatrol · 13/04/2025 18:05

SpringIsSpringing25 · 13/04/2025 17:45

It does get tiring repeatedly explaining this to you.

There is a certain minimum that people need to exist, the benefits system barely reaches this level. Expecting people to live on this is unreasonable. It is not unreasonable to expect employers to pay more than enough for people to barely exist on..

What is it about that that you find so complicated to understand?

But if workers are expected to survive on it, why not people with mental health problems?

You aren’t justifying why state benefits should be higher than the minimum wage. And - how exactly that is supposed to work in terms of people ever feeling able to get back into work.

x2boys · 13/04/2025 18:05

ScruffMuffin · 13/04/2025 17:59

Haven't RTWT.

Had no idea I could be better off on benefits. I have multiple MH and physical health problems, two degrees, two diplomas, and work a DIFFICULT minimum-wage job, with extremely challenging children. I'm fiercely determined and fiercely independent, and will work until I literally can't get out of bed. Then I'll work from my bed.

I appreciate that I'm in a more fortunate position than some. But I could definitely claim disability benefits. I don't want to, because they need to go to people who need them more than I do.

Edited

And thats fine but not.everyone who has a mental health condition will be eligible for disabillity benefits
And not everybody who has a mental health condtion will be able to work
Paticularly those with severe and enduring mental illness.

BobbyBiscuits · 13/04/2025 18:05

That's great that you think that. You must be some kind of socio-economic genius.
I hope you or your family never suffer from life threatening mental illness.