Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Person with MH problems should not be better off no working

581 replies

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 16:54

Just that really. Someone working a minimum wage job full-time should not be worse off than someone not working due to mental health problems and claiming benefits.
I know several people in this situation claiming UC for housing benefit, council tax, ESA, disability top up and PIP. They all have no work record and few qualifications so would probably only get a minimum wage job. But their income would reduce. So they have a financial incentive not to recover.

OP posts:
Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:56

So why do they need an extra £1000 a month?

SquashedSquid · 13/04/2025 19:57

Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:56

So why do they need an extra £1000 a month?

Are you genuinely being serious right now?

Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:57

Sadly exactly

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 19:57

Hastentoadd · 13/04/2025 19:54

We system are you referring to?
As if you are referring to the system I think you are referring to I can assure most people who are not a part of it are extremely glad they are not and don’t have to rely on it
Do you seriously think ( if we are referring to the same thing) that people are envious of that kind of lifestyle?

I was talking about social housing.

But yes I genuinely do think there are people that think if they could just say they were ‘a bit disabled’ they could rake in thousands in ‘free’ money and never have to work again, while living a life of luxury.

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 19:57

The truth is most people use PIP for bills.

OP posts:
Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:58

Yes

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 19:58

Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:56

So why do they need an extra £1000 a month?

What benefit pays £1000 per month?

Waterweight · 13/04/2025 19:58

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 16:54

Just that really. Someone working a minimum wage job full-time should not be worse off than someone not working due to mental health problems and claiming benefits.
I know several people in this situation claiming UC for housing benefit, council tax, ESA, disability top up and PIP. They all have no work record and few qualifications so would probably only get a minimum wage job. But their income would reduce. So they have a financial incentive not to recover.

Yes absolutely instead of raising the minimum wage (as many people lobby for) we should set the benefit cap for people with low mental health to the point of being unable to work so far down they can ... Financially incentives themselves to recover ?

Honestly, your so clever I don't know why the government hasn't Personally appointed you in charge of the health care system & the finance department

Serencwtch · 13/04/2025 19:58

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 18:25

Someone whose mental health improves enough so they can work a minimum wage job, which is often bloody brutal, is unlikely to get PIP.

That's incorrect. Many people with severe mental illness are on PIP & in work. Many people with a whole range of disabilities receive PIP & work.

I have schizoaffective disorder & receive PIP & also work. I have many friends with severe mental illness in the same position..

Being in work does not affect PIP.

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 19:58

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 19:57

The truth is most people use PIP for bills.

That is true due to the cost of living.
I know someone who gave up her Motability car so she could afford bills.

Hastentoadd · 13/04/2025 19:59

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 19:57

I was talking about social housing.

But yes I genuinely do think there are people that think if they could just say they were ‘a bit disabled’ they could rake in thousands in ‘free’ money and never have to work again, while living a life of luxury.

I agree, I actually think there are possibly ( maybe I’m wrong) an awfull lot of people out there who are doing it unfortunately

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 20:00

Bunty1958 · 13/04/2025 19:56

So why do they need an extra £1000 a month?

Noones getting an extra £1000 a month. The research shows that the average cost associated with being disabled is around £1000/month (which by definition means it’s much lower for some and much higher for others).

PIP isn’t as much as that and only people with the most limiting conditions would receive the highest rates of PIP anyway

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 20:00

Serencwtch · 13/04/2025 19:58

That's incorrect. Many people with severe mental illness are on PIP & in work. Many people with a whole range of disabilities receive PIP & work.

I have schizoaffective disorder & receive PIP & also work. I have many friends with severe mental illness in the same position..

Being in work does not affect PIP.

I am honestly surprised at that, How can you possibly say you need help with dressing, getting out of bed, cooking etc and be able to work?

OP posts:
Julen7 · 13/04/2025 20:00

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 19:58

What benefit pays £1000 per month?

PIP and LCWRA together

Mumble12 · 13/04/2025 20:00

Hastentoadd · 13/04/2025 19:59

I agree, I actually think there are possibly ( maybe I’m wrong) an awfull lot of people out there who are doing it unfortunately

well given that the fraud rate for pip is estimated to be 0% I don’t think there are lots of people faking it

SquashedSquid · 13/04/2025 20:00

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 19:58

What benefit pays £1000 per month?

None, that's the point. It costs a disabled person on average of £1000 extra a month just to exist. The highest rate of PIP is only just over £700 a month. £400 if you use your mobility element for a vehicle or powerchair. So PIP doesn't cover anywhere near the extra costs of being disabled, let alone anything else. Bills, housing, food, etc.

spicemaiden · 13/04/2025 20:02

AroundTheMulberryBush · 13/04/2025 19:55

Do you have a disability social worker? Or any previous/current link with them? My father has a neurological condition, gets DLA care & mobility higher rate etc, the full range of benefits basically as his disability is so severe and he has nothing to his name - no savings, rents his house etc. He has enough money left at the end of the month to pay bills, buy his groceries and has a bit left over for his baccy (much to my pleading with him to stop!) and a once weekly bet on the horses. He's definitely not flush after paying for his care package but he isn't destitute either. His benefits pays for a 4 x daily care package. I'm wondering if there is something that you're missing out on or any more help you can get? It might be worth seeing about it.

Why isn’t he receiving a personal budget from adult social care?

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 20:02

Julen7 · 13/04/2025 20:00

PIP and LCWRA together

That is not one benefit. They are not even linked.

aster10 · 13/04/2025 20:02

It is an unfair situation, not uncommon in our imperfect world. When I volunteered for a mental health charity, I heard about similar situations several times (mind you, this was about 10 years ago). Someone would feel better, start work, lose the benefits and be worse off. Then they would feel worse, would lose the job and would face having to go through the assessment (which they had no energy for) to be approved for benefits again, so they’d end up homeless etc etc. I think some people still preferred to start working.

SquashedSquid · 13/04/2025 20:03

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 20:00

I am honestly surprised at that, How can you possibly say you need help with dressing, getting out of bed, cooking etc and be able to work?

Some of us work from home, from bed. Some of us have carers that come in to dress us, feed us etc before we go to work. Some of us have 24 hour care so they actually accompany us to work. Again, it's hardly rocket science.

Julen7 · 13/04/2025 20:03

Julen7 · 13/04/2025 20:00

PIP and LCWRA together

Not linked but very often claimed together

springbringshope · 13/04/2025 20:03

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 17:02

I specified it because I do not know anyone with mental health problems who employ carers with their income. I do know people who do not work due to physical disabilities or issues such as brain damage, who employ carers. They are not well off as a result.

Wow you know several people who don’t work due to mental health problems and several for physical health problems.
weird. I don’t know anyone yet you know several.

WeylandYutani · 13/04/2025 20:04

aster10 · 13/04/2025 20:02

It is an unfair situation, not uncommon in our imperfect world. When I volunteered for a mental health charity, I heard about similar situations several times (mind you, this was about 10 years ago). Someone would feel better, start work, lose the benefits and be worse off. Then they would feel worse, would lose the job and would face having to go through the assessment (which they had no energy for) to be approved for benefits again, so they’d end up homeless etc etc. I think some people still preferred to start working.

THen that is a cycle that needs to be broken. But it wont be, because no emplyer will take on someone who is ill and needs lots of adjustments and time off.

Teddybear23 · 13/04/2025 20:04

i had a friend who had not worked for at least 20 years after having her last child, because she had a rich husband (and then ex). She had a lot of investments including rental houses as income. When she was diagnosed she automatically claimed for everything she was entitled to but that amount came to more than I was earning full time for the NHS! Obviously I didn’t want her to be ill but how can it be fair that she got more than I did, and it wasn’t as if she’d had to pack in work because she was too ill to go.

godmum56 · 13/04/2025 20:04

YourTidyScroller · 13/04/2025 16:59

They are telling me they get more than they would get in a national minimum wage job.

oh they are telling you.......

Swipe left for the next trending thread