Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Gender and pronouns

1000 replies

Wyki · 10/04/2025 18:55

Before I start, the daily mail and other papers can all fuck off

I’m prepared to be flamed for this as I’ve been here long enough to know how it all works but….

aibu to tell my son he can’t have his partner over any more

It’s a new relationship. My son is 21 and the new partner is 18

He barely works and is consequently on a low salary however he does help me with childcare (that I pay a minimal amount for)

the new partner is a very petite pink haired “girl” that does ballet and dance but uses the pronoun he/him

my 11 year old daughter is finding it confusing and asked if her brother is gay. I replied with “no because the partner is very feminine and is a girl despite the pronouns” (I couldn’t care less if he was gay, sexuality isn’t important)

So am I being unreasonable in saying the partner doesn’t come over as it’s just too weird and I don’t want that example being set for my daughter

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
BreadInCaptivity · 11/04/2025 22:37

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:25

What?

So you don’t think that sex is determined at conception by chromosomes then?

So sorry- shall we start again- what do you mean by “male”?

Edited

🤣

LittleCharlotte · 11/04/2025 22:38

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:32

Again, as above. I have no idea who you are or what your circumstance, but regardless you have no grounds or legitimacy for claiming an “us” or silencing a discussion about developmental differences in a conversation about the biology of sex determination:

Edited

I actually do, but seeing as you think your voice matters more than anything else you won't care.

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:41

LittleCharlotte · 11/04/2025 22:38

I actually do, but seeing as you think your voice matters more than anything else you won't care.

Ha, the irony.

BelfastBard · 11/04/2025 22:43

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:32

Again, as above. I have no idea who you are or what your circumstance, but regardless you have no grounds or legitimacy for claiming an “us” or silencing a discussion about developmental differences in a conversation about the biology of sex determination:

Edited

People with DSDs (genuine people and not just the teens and young people online who claim to have them) have repeatedly and vociferously asked trans people and activists to stop co opting them into these conversations. And they are repeatedly ignored.

TheKeatingFive · 11/04/2025 22:43

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:34

There is a huge body of scientific evidence for this

Once again, where is all this evidence?

PoppyTheGuineaPig · 11/04/2025 22:44

I think using the pronouns they/them will work for anyone regardless of what they wish to be called. No one is being misgendered if you just use they/them but at the same time you aren't pandering to a delusion that makes you feel uncomfortable.

BlokalShopForBlokalPeople · 11/04/2025 22:44

If the gender debate was a game of chess we'd be at the end game now.

People like Tandora have lost most of their pieces and have limited moves available. They can lose by pretending male and female are indefinable qualities and thereby make themselves seem ridiculous, or they can lose by conceding they are arguing for men to access women's spaces. They were never in a position to win fairly anyway, hence all the bullying, censoring and discrimination the TRAs have had to resort to over the last decade.

mslava · 11/04/2025 22:44

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:20

There absolutely is every need to mention variations in sex development as I have clearly demonstrated and explained in this thread.

I’m not mentioning “you” - I have zero knowledge of who you are or what condition you may or may not have. variations in sex development encompasses a huge spectrum of difference , and regardless of your own personal circumstances you have no grounds or legitimacy for silencing discussion about the reality of these differences in a conversation where people are making fanatical and unscientific assertions about “sex” and using these ideas to deny the existence of trans people.

Who denied the existence of trans people on here ? I must have missed that. TA made it very clear they exist. What the majority are saying is that trans women are not women, women don’t need to give up their rights for trans women, who as biological men born in a patriarchy, already are privileged and had more rights to begin with. What people are saying that not all people who are suddenly trans suffer from gender dysmorphia, but are simply vulnerable people trying to find a community to belong to, fight off depression, find acceptance. What people are saying that calling a girl, who presents like a girl, ‘he’ is wrong grammar and the insistence on that language is gaslighting - as it is with ‘furries’ insist society pretends they are animals. What people are saying that chemical castration and body mutulating to change externally a body to appear as the other sex is similar to amputating healthy limbs of people with a mental illness who are asking for that and should not be so easily offered to children.
Nobody is trying to prove trans people don’t exist.

DownWhichOfLate · 11/04/2025 22:46

TheKeatingFive · 11/04/2025 22:43

Once again, where is all this evidence?

I think you’ll find it’s been “clearly demonstrated and explained in this thread.” 😂

TheKeatingFive · 11/04/2025 22:54

DownWhichOfLate · 11/04/2025 22:46

I think you’ll find it’s been “clearly demonstrated and explained in this thread.” 😂

😂😂😂

BundleBoogie · 11/04/2025 23:01

Tandora · 11/04/2025 22:22

For a long time they weren’t observable or testable- does that mean they didn’t exist? Did they only start to exist when we had the technologies to observe them?
Actually there are many many aspects of being trans that are observable and testable- in the same way that,
for example, autism is observable and testable. Yes we don’t have a specific blood test or some such, but that’s the same for all kinds of medical conditions, until- thanks to the development of new medical technologies- it isn’t.

Edited

Do elaborate on these ‘observable’ and ‘testable’ aspects that no one has to date either observed or tested, unless you mean the stringy hair and dodgy eye make up rocked by certain groups?

I very much doubt they’ll find a blood test to reliably diagnose a wide and sometimes changing variety of identities which is determined by the self for a myriad of reasons and actually, when the idea of some medical testing was mooted by a trans researcher, there was outcry from many trans people and it was summarily shut down for *reasons.

Hoydenish · 11/04/2025 23:13

LittleCharlotte · 11/04/2025 22:38

I actually do, but seeing as you think your voice matters more than anything else you won't care.

LittleCharlotte I am so sorry that that particular poster refuses to listen to your pleas for intersex people to be left out of these conversations.

PoppyTheGuineaPig · 11/04/2025 23:15

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/04/2025 22:18

But this has nothing to do with trans people.

DSDs are physical health conditions affecting a tiny minority of people.

Identifying as transgender is probably best described as a mental health condition affecting a different small minority of people.

Whilst it's not impossible for someone to be in both groups, it's vanishingly unlikely.

Edited

Absolutely this. Why are we women having to bend over backwards for a tiny minority of people?

I've nothing against them personally but I refuse to give up my female only spaces. We women have rights too and there are many of us. Not to mention that our rights are safeguarding related, which I think should be a priority above rights that are just about an identity or perceived identity. In the UK, transpersons are not denied any rights at all. Thankfully. I'm glad we aren't a transphobic or bigoted country. We really aren't . We aren't harming transpersons by telling them To use their birth sex pronouns or bathrooms etc

blubberyboo · 11/04/2025 23:16

Vannymcvan · 10/04/2025 22:29

Firstly, mumsnet seems to be a very anti trans place so I'm not surprised at the comments. Secondly, he can refer to himself however he wants. Unclear why this would be confusing for your daughter. Perhaps this could be a chance to discuss different attitudes towards gender identity?

Any person can refer to themselves as anything they want. That is freedom of belief.

Everyone else doesn't have to play along or acknowledge it as real or show it any respect.
That's freedom FROM beliefs

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:18

BelfastBard · 11/04/2025 22:43

People with DSDs (genuine people and not just the teens and young people online who claim to have them) have repeatedly and vociferously asked trans people and activists to stop co opting them into these conversations. And they are repeatedly ignored.

This kind of manipulative bollocks has to stop.

First of all, variations in sex development describe a huge variety / vast diversity of conditions that affect millions of people around the world. These people do not have one hive mind, or one voice. there is barely any kind of cohesive community, and a considerable divergence/
polarity in opinion amongst people affected by these conditions as to what language to even use (eg intersex versus DSDs) let alone agreement on aspects of organisation/ advocacy - do people with VSCs belong as part of the LGBTIA spectrum etc.

Secondly, and regardless of these dynamics , if people are going to make claims about biology and sex development- and use such claims as the basis for forming opinions about law , political organisation and policy, then we have to be allowed to discuss the actual science of sex development in all its complexity. It is absolutely absurd , and highly manipulative , to continue to insist we are not allowed to discuss the realities of this, and no one who wants to have an honest conversation about this stuff is going to stand for it.

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:19

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:18

This kind of manipulative bollocks has to stop.

First of all, variations in sex development describe a huge variety / vast diversity of conditions that affect millions of people around the world. These people do not have one hive mind, or one voice. there is barely any kind of cohesive community, and a considerable divergence/
polarity in opinion amongst people affected by these conditions as to what language to even use (eg intersex versus DSDs) let alone agreement on aspects of organisation/ advocacy - do people with VSCs belong as part of the LGBTIA spectrum etc.

Secondly, and regardless of these dynamics , if people are going to make claims about biology and sex development- and use such claims as the basis for forming opinions about law , political organisation and policy, then we have to be allowed to discuss the actual science of sex development in all its complexity. It is absolutely absurd , and highly manipulative , to continue to insist we are not allowed to discuss the realities of this, and no one who wants to have an honest conversation about this stuff is going to stand for it.

Edited

Also for you @Hoydenish

PoppyTheGuineaPig · 11/04/2025 23:39

blubberyboo · 11/04/2025 23:16

Any person can refer to themselves as anything they want. That is freedom of belief.

Everyone else doesn't have to play along or acknowledge it as real or show it any respect.
That's freedom FROM beliefs

absolutely this !!! Of course trans people have the right identify how they want and can ask politely to be called by a certain pronoun. At the same time it's the other persons right to abide by that pronoun or not. No big deal. No one is harmed by refusing to use a chosen pronoun.

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:44

Furthermore , it isn’t me who is bringing people with VSCs into this conversation- they are part of the conversation. Implicitly , if not explicitly, every single time a (so called) “gender critical” insists that sex development is simple, always binary, determined at conception , reducible to chromosomes, etc. never was this demonstrated more clearly than the recent controversy over that poor boxer, who was
clearly a professional athlete , assigned female, with a DSD, but who was assumed to be and “accused” of being a trans woman , a cheat, and a male abuser of women.

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:45

PoppyTheGuineaPig · 11/04/2025 23:39

absolutely this !!! Of course trans people have the right identify how they want and can ask politely to be called by a certain pronoun. At the same time it's the other persons right to abide by that pronoun or not. No big deal. No one is harmed by refusing to use a chosen pronoun.

Edited

No one is harmed by refusing to use a chosen pronoun

you clearly have zero knowledge and understanding of gender dysphoria.

cariadlet · 12/04/2025 00:48

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:44

Furthermore , it isn’t me who is bringing people with VSCs into this conversation- they are part of the conversation. Implicitly , if not explicitly, every single time a (so called) “gender critical” insists that sex development is simple, always binary, determined at conception , reducible to chromosomes, etc. never was this demonstrated more clearly than the recent controversy over that poor boxer, who was
clearly a professional athlete , assigned female, with a DSD, but who was assumed to be and “accused” of being a trans woman , a cheat, and a male abuser of women.

There were 2 male boxers competing in women's boxing at the last Olympics.

They are men with DSDs who had ambiguous genitalia at birth and, largely because of the health care available where they were born, were incorrectly assumed to be girls.

Once they were of an age where they should have hit female puberty, it was clear that something was wrong. That's when the dsds were diagnosed and it was realised that they were male.

That must have come as a shock. It would have been a stressful and distressing time for them and their families. I have every sympathy for the children that they were.

But by the time they fought in the Olympics, they knew that they were men and had known for years. Their trainers knew that they were men.

But they still fought in the Women's category because they knew that they had a much greater chance of taking home a medal.

I have zero sympathy for the adult male cheats. I will save my sympathy for the women whose medals they stole.

PoppyTheGuineaPig · 12/04/2025 01:08

Tandora · 11/04/2025 23:45

No one is harmed by refusing to use a chosen pronoun

you clearly have zero knowledge and understanding of gender dysphoria.

Well it's easy enough to deal with that one. Just use their chosen name or they/them. No harm done. It's not comparable to a woman needing to access a safe space free of men because she has PTSD from being raped. I

Trauma is a whole different ball game from someone not using a correct pronoun.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/04/2025 01:10

BlokalShopForBlokalPeople · 11/04/2025 22:44

If the gender debate was a game of chess we'd be at the end game now.

People like Tandora have lost most of their pieces and have limited moves available. They can lose by pretending male and female are indefinable qualities and thereby make themselves seem ridiculous, or they can lose by conceding they are arguing for men to access women's spaces. They were never in a position to win fairly anyway, hence all the bullying, censoring and discrimination the TRAs have had to resort to over the last decade.

This ☝️

Willandra · 12/04/2025 03:47

MrsOvertonsWindow · 11/04/2025 14:40

Meh. What you're looking at is adults talking about the difference between facts and fiction, the use of coercive control to silence and the need to safeguard children. Fortunately we live in a democracy (flawed as it is) and citizens are allowed to discuss matters - especially when they have a negative impact on others (men in women's sport, inaccurate language and gaslighting children into believing their bodies are flawed but a sex change will cure them etc).

Demands to BE KIND are often directed at women and girls by those who wish women not to speak about matters of concern.

Edited

👏👏👏💐

Willandra · 12/04/2025 04:01

BelfastBard · 11/04/2025 21:50

Precisely. No decent man would want to violate women’s boundaries like that. I’d take my chances undressing in front of ten men on the street who didnt want to be in a women’s changing room over one who would any day.

Agreed.

When those 20 or so male Spanish soldiers all self id as Transwomen Lesbians and got many new privileges, in an interview one said She would never use the female bathrooms out of respect for biological women !

This was picked up by a TRA group who accused Her of being a fake. She then threatened to sue them for transphobia.

DoddlesMcDoddle · 12/04/2025 04:10

Galwaygirlxxx · 11/04/2025 14:32

Mumsnet is the most transphobic site I've ever seen. How these threads go about is disgusting. Is all of the UK like this ? It isn't as bad in London I know.

Look up how many gay people, trans people and non binary people kill themselves every year.

Other people's genders and bodies are none of your business.

Please BE KIND.

Mumsnet is about WOMENS RIGHTS. If that is 'transphobic' to you, you have the problem, @Galwaygirlxxx . Threatening suicide as a method of control to force women to prioritise men is the weapon of abusers. Men committing suicide because they can't get what they want, is not womens problem. 'Be Kind' is what has got women in this situation. Strange how 'Be Kind' only goes ONE WAY. How males aren't kind to women and girls and stay out of our spaces. You've been conditioned and socialised to tell women and girls to 'Be Kind' to our own detriment. Have a long hard think about that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.