Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Best friend compared her inheritance to my benefits

412 replies

theusualdrama · 02/04/2025 18:18

My closest friend, who I have known for 15 years, is currently single, employed full time and has recently purchased her first home after years of renting. She doesn’t have any children. She grew up with her mother and didn’t see her father for over 20 years. He runs his own business and is quite wealthy. On the other hand, I’m a single parent with 3 children. I work part time and rent a small house. I rely on universal credit since my ex doesn’t provide any financial support. Like my friend, I was also raised by a single parent and have no connection with my father. He’s also very well off but has never offered any help or support. Even though, we share similar backgrounds, we’ve clearly taken different paths in life.

She recently reconnected with her dad, who gave her £50,000 to help with a house deposit. I was absolutely thrilled for her, knowing how challenging it was for her to purchase a house on her own without this money. We got together for coffee earlier, and I asked her how the house renovations were going. She filled me in on all the upgrades she’s done and everything. I mentioned how lucky she was to have her father’s support, and I meant that in a positive way. It seems she was offended, as she subsequently likened her inheritance to me receiving benefits for free (her words).

It was uncomfortable after that and we haven’t spoken since. Her comment keeps running through my head, and I’m really surprised she believes it’s the same situation.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Butchyrestingface · 02/04/2025 19:46

You both sound like tact-free zones but you started it so ...

Offtobuttonmoontovisitmrspoon · 02/04/2025 19:46

It doesn’t really matter who was right and who was wrong, I wouldn’t lose a good friend over this. It sounds like you are both touchy and maybe it was a miscommunication. Make the first move if you want your friend back.

daisychain01 · 02/04/2025 19:48

theusualdrama · 02/04/2025 18:40

I get where people are coming from, but the support I get helps me take care of my children’s basic needs like food, clothes and paying the rent and bills. The money she’s received has opened doors for her to better her life and possibly own something valuable one day. For me, owning a home feels so out of reach, so I don’t share the same perspective. That’s really what’s bothering me.

Totally get why you were offended, @theusualdrama it didn't bear comparison and your friend was crass and insensitive to basically rub your nose in the fact you need to claim benefits. I can see why you have felt too uncomfortable to talk to her.

pinkdelight · 02/04/2025 19:48

Bingbopboomboomboombopbam · 02/04/2025 19:42

I didn’t say it’s for her work, I said “considering you’re employed”. Which clearly means she’s not planning on just living off of benefits.

Nobody said she’s planning on living off benefits. But the benefits are money for nothing not for her work. What point were you making?

Zanzara · 02/04/2025 19:48

Booksaresick · 02/04/2025 19:34

People are missing the fact that the ex not providing any support is irrelevant in terms of putting the burden on the tax-payer.
the ex could pay thousands every month and the op would still receive the exact amount of benefits she received now at the cost of the taxpayer. Child maintenance is not counted as income.

my DH pays 1.5k per month to his ex and it is not included in her benefits calculation. She therefore gets nearly 2k in benefits for 3 children + minimum wage. The tax payer is paying for something that the father already covers.

This is an excellent point.

Apparently our society has such low expectations of the Menz to do the right thing by their own children, and so little faith in the civil servants of the CMS to actually enforce their own pitiful rulings, that the default assumption is that between them, they will do fuck all. We are expected to suck this up, not question it, and stump up every time.

We should all be questioning this with our MPs and not letting it go. Other countries would be on the streets.

Annascaul · 02/04/2025 19:48

Bingbopboomboomboombopbam · 02/04/2025 19:23

I’m surprised at the amount of people calling benefits money for nothing considering you’re employed.

She works 18 hours per week.
That’s half a week.

Hwi · 02/04/2025 19:49

She is right - you are supported by the state (for free), she is supported by her father (for free). What upset you so much? Your support is though much more than hers - surely you realise that?

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 19:49

Annascaul · 02/04/2025 19:48

She works 18 hours per week.
That’s half a week.

Less.

Annascaul · 02/04/2025 19:50

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 19:49

Less.

I was being generous 😁

rivalsbinge · 02/04/2025 19:51

theusualdrama · 02/04/2025 18:40

I get where people are coming from, but the support I get helps me take care of my children’s basic needs like food, clothes and paying the rent and bills. The money she’s received has opened doors for her to better her life and possibly own something valuable one day. For me, owning a home feels so out of reach, so I don’t share the same perspective. That’s really what’s bothering me.

But your life choice was to have kids hers isnt? And I think her reply was perfectly fair as well.

2021x · 02/04/2025 19:52

Being from a financially secure but emotionally dysfunctional family, I get the “But at least…” comments a lot.

If she was talking about it with some negativity it means she had some complicated or some conflicting feelings about it.

Maybe she shouldn’t have spoken about it with you, given your situation, but it does make sense given your clearly close relationship.

Barrenfieldoffucks · 02/04/2025 19:54

REDB99 · 02/04/2025 18:25

I think she means that you’ve both had money ‘for free’ in that neither of you have had to work to get it so in that sense it could be comparable. But you’re offended as you see her ‘unearned’ money as different from your ‘unearned’ money. You need your unearned money to live of but she doesn’t. You both sound a bit resentful of the other.

Agreed.

Bingbopboomboomboombopbam · 02/04/2025 19:55

@pinkdelight my point is that I was surprised, that’s all? Most of the comments towards OP were passive aggressive about her benefits and I was surprised

Kendodd · 02/04/2025 19:55

Zanzara · 02/04/2025 19:48

This is an excellent point.

Apparently our society has such low expectations of the Menz to do the right thing by their own children, and so little faith in the civil servants of the CMS to actually enforce their own pitiful rulings, that the default assumption is that between them, they will do fuck all. We are expected to suck this up, not question it, and stump up every time.

We should all be questioning this with our MPs and not letting it go. Other countries would be on the streets.

Apart from the fact that men vote as well.

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 19:59

It looks like you think of your benefits as earned money. You have earnt it because you have three kids and are working (very little). Someone is working a lot more than you, to psy for your choices. To pay for you not working a lot, and deciding to have three kids.

This, makes you sound entitled and out of touch with reality.

Kendodd · 02/04/2025 20:00

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 19:33

Well I work full time to take care of my children’s basic needs. Decided only to have two. You DO get free money. But you think it’s your basic right. Wake up.

Well it is her right to claim benefits, regardless of what the public think of it. Laws about it and everything cementing all these rights.

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 20:02

I’m not from the UK, but how is it that you have so many single mothers? And fathers who get away with it? It’s extreme, compared to most other countries. What kind of society lets this happen? It’s like going back 150 years in time.

Tnib · 02/04/2025 20:03

theusualdrama · 02/04/2025 18:40

I get where people are coming from, but the support I get helps me take care of my children’s basic needs like food, clothes and paying the rent and bills. The money she’s received has opened doors for her to better her life and possibly own something valuable one day. For me, owning a home feels so out of reach, so I don’t share the same perspective. That’s really what’s bothering me.

I’m with you. The two are not comparable.

I can sorta understand her being upset but her comment seems reactive and sounded spiteful whereas I think what you said was maybe a bit clumsy but not ill meant.

namethisbird · 02/04/2025 20:05

YABU - least her money isn’t from the tax payer. she works FT and has received some inheritance early. Your comment about being ‘lucky’ was unnecessary so I’m not surprised she retaliated.

Philandbill · 02/04/2025 20:06

LolaLima · 02/04/2025 19:40

What do you mean you dont share the same perspective? this is all about choices isnt it?- you chose to have three kids so you now have less available cash to buy a house.

She chose not to have kids and therefore can spend money on a house, because she doesnt have kids to pay for. It has nothing to do with perspective and everything to do with consequences of lifestyle choices. I have two kids, would have liked a third but we couldnt afford it at the time so we didnt.

You are coming across as quite resentful and bitter tbh

Agreed. You had three children. I have two because I couldn't see how we could comfortably afford a third though I longed for a third child. And I work 55- 60 hours every week (just got home after a 12:hour day) so I'm pretty envious of your 18 hours too and somewhat bitter...

Zanzara · 02/04/2025 20:07

Kendodd · 02/04/2025 19:55

Apart from the fact that men vote as well.

Your point is?

Sadly feckless fathers get a vote, if they can be bothered to exercise it. However, the tragedy is that no political party is raising this as the massive issue that it is.

So none of us get a vote on it, and nothing is done.

noquinoa · 02/04/2025 20:07

Kendodd · 02/04/2025 20:00

Well it is her right to claim benefits, regardless of what the public think of it. Laws about it and everything cementing all these rights.

Agree. But her money is from the tax payer. Her friends money isn’t.

pinkdelight · 02/04/2025 20:13

Bingbopboomboomboombopbam · 02/04/2025 19:55

@pinkdelight my point is that I was surprised, that’s all? Most of the comments towards OP were passive aggressive about her benefits and I was surprised

Only because she seems to think they’re distinct from her friend’s money in some way that the rest of us don’t follow. It’s all money that’s come to them unearned but OP takes umbrage at that idea because she has kids or something, it’s not quite clear.

Kendodd · 02/04/2025 20:16

Zanzara · 02/04/2025 20:07

Your point is?

Sadly feckless fathers get a vote, if they can be bothered to exercise it. However, the tragedy is that no political party is raising this as the massive issue that it is.

So none of us get a vote on it, and nothing is done.

Edited

Yes, completely agree. But it won't change.
I'm old enough to remember when the gov in the 1990s tried to do something about this. The howls of 'it's not fair men are made to pay' could be heard from outer space. Lots of those complaints came from women as well, second wives and partners. You see it on here all the time as well, women talking about how their partner ex bleeds them dry.

ThisOldThang · 02/04/2025 20:18

Maybe as somebody that works full-time, and pays taxes that support your lifestyle choice to work part-time, she found it a bit rich for you to try and shame her for receiving the parental support that's enabled her to buy a house?