Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this photo is not appropriate to advertise a dress?

277 replies

TheGoodEnoughWife · 21/03/2025 18:49

Is it just my raging feminist thoughts with this photo that is being used as one of the pictures of a dress offered for sale on a high street store website. Is this appropriate? I don't think it is but one might say that that is my weird view and actually it is a perfectly okay pic? (!)
I think it looks like a 'come fuck me' picture and that is not okay?!

To think this photo is not appropriate to advertise a dress?
OP posts:
Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 22/03/2025 17:34

Looks like they are sitting like that because of a nasty dose of summat down below….again a rather negative connotation and another reason not to buy the shitty denim dress.

AInightingale · 22/03/2025 17:53

Just had a quick Google on averages - the average British woman is 5'4-5'5, wears a size 14-16, has a 36DD bust and wears a size six shoe. There aren't many female models who reflect that really. I do find it odd that the fashion industry continues to use flat chested, narrow hipped, very tall models within mainstream markets. It makes so little sense. Why not design the clothes to flatter more average figures?

UnctuousUnicorns · 22/03/2025 17:53

I noticed a while back that models on women's clothing websites frequently resemble escapees from Victorian lunatic asylums, with their hair, facial expressions and poses. Goodness knows how this is meant to entice anyone to want to buy the garments. 🤷‍♀️

Shitmonger · 22/03/2025 18:23

Pinkelephant66 · 22/03/2025 00:20

Are we sure it’s a man?? I’m usually very good at spotting even the most ‘convincing’ ones!

I wasn’t really paying attention at first but if you open the picture and zoom in to look at his hands, face, and neck it’s more obvious.

MoonWoman69 · 22/03/2025 18:38

So now we've gone from the photo being seen as a (definitely not!) "provocative" pose, to the model being having huge feet, then to her being a man?!
The word unhinged was used earlier, but I don't think that's just the OP on this thread!

It's a shit dress, with an androgynous looking woman, in a very badly posed photograph! Nothing more to it!
Must be a fucking slow weekend somewhere in the country! MN definitely needs a bloody eye roll emoji!

Muddlingalongsomehow · 22/03/2025 18:39

That's a transwoman, surely. Those are not how a woman's legs look. Nor feet.

WiddlinDiddlin · 22/03/2025 18:44

You understand that models are often above average in height, and taller people have bigger feet, right?

And also that you can take rather odd photos if you use strange angles and different lenses... yeah?

I don't see anything that indicates this model is not a woman.

SmudgeButt · 22/03/2025 18:51

It tells me the photographer should get a new job.

Frankly I like photos of clothing that show me what I'm buying not someone's mistaken idea of something artistic.

MeandT · 22/03/2025 18:57

Shitmonger · 22/03/2025 18:23

I wasn’t really paying attention at first but if you open the picture and zoom in to look at his hands, face, and neck it’s more obvious.

@Shitmonger your user name says it all! Step away from the Mail Online & get outside more (ideally while observing the rich variety of womanhood still born with an XX makeup!)

Gettingbysomehow · 22/03/2025 19:04

AInightingale · 22/03/2025 17:53

Just had a quick Google on averages - the average British woman is 5'4-5'5, wears a size 14-16, has a 36DD bust and wears a size six shoe. There aren't many female models who reflect that really. I do find it odd that the fashion industry continues to use flat chested, narrow hipped, very tall models within mainstream markets. It makes so little sense. Why not design the clothes to flatter more average figures?

I should be a model, those are my exact proportions 😁Im too old though.

MarvellousMonsters · 22/03/2025 19:10

It looks to me like the ‘dress’ is actually a shapeless tent and the only way they can make it look interesting is to scrunch it around the model in this disturbingly toilet style pose. It’s not at all sexual, unless you consider a woman sitting with her knees not pressed together to be a come-on.

ConnieSlow · 22/03/2025 19:31

The fact that you thought it was such a graphic sexual picture says more about where your mind is. Disturbing how your mind actually went there

OneTC · 22/03/2025 19:42

I see a badly composed photo of a not very good dress and shoes you could probably sail round the world in.

StrikeAlways · 22/03/2025 19:58

faerietales · 21/03/2025 18:53

I mean, it's not very flattering but it's hardly offensive Confused

This 👆

MimiGC · 22/03/2025 20:01

Poor photography, unless they especially wanted her feet to look as big as boats.

RavenhairedRachel · 22/03/2025 20:28

She looks like she's sat on the lav.

Lulu49 · 22/03/2025 20:35

Ohy God what is it like to be you?! 😁 How on earth did you get that from that picture lol

Dawnb19 · 22/03/2025 20:36

When looking to buy a dress I don't care what it looks like on someone on the toilet, I want to see what it looks like on some standing up.

CyanMaker · 22/03/2025 21:50

I think they could have chosen a more flattering pose and a more cheerful model. While they're at it don't even advertise a "dress" that looks like a rag from a thrift shop.

croydon15 · 22/03/2025 22:20

TheHerboriste · 21/03/2025 18:50

Confused I think it looks like someone on a toilet.

Just what l thought.

KnottyAuty · 22/03/2025 22:33

The perspective is completely weird and I have no idea why M&S thought this would help sell the dress (or shoes which feature more prominently). If this women was to scale, her feet are twice the size of her head - dysmorphic!

PickAChew · 22/03/2025 23:19

Muddlingalongsomehow · 22/03/2025 18:39

That's a transwoman, surely. Those are not how a woman's legs look. Nor feet.

You seem to have a problem understanding camera angles.

To think this photo is not appropriate to advertise a dress?
Lorrainedrops · 22/03/2025 23:22

MissMoneyFairy · 21/03/2025 18:51

Her enormous feet are the first thing I noticed

Me too 😂

LauderSyme · 22/03/2025 23:31

I don't see it as sexually provocative. These weird poses and perspectives which actively hide the clothes seem to be on trend in fashion advertising. Bizarre.

KimberleyClark · 22/03/2025 23:32

Lorrainedrops · 22/03/2025 23:22

Me too 😂

They look out of proportion because of the way the photo was taken.

Swipe left for the next trending thread