Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Britain should have nothing to do with this war

594 replies

Foodtimeisit · 01/03/2025 12:54

After yesterday's news, Britain shouldn't be the one funding war as USA has said they are out now. There's no chance Britain can fight this war alone with Ukraine against Russia.
Since this war started, our life has only become miserable with CoL increase.
AIBU to think we shouldn't have anything to do this war and we should fix our own problems first before giving away our tax money?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Reetpetitenot · 03/03/2025 13:34

deeppremium · 03/03/2025 10:14

@Reetpetitenot

What are the rules you referred to when you said "You think seized Russian assets should just be doled out to willy nilly by the UK govt? There are rules, which luckily the UK is willing to abide by" ?

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10034/

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-01-06/debates/7A29F43F-1BAA-4F77-AE79-888303D606BA/FrozenRussianAssetsUkraine

DdraigGoch · 03/03/2025 15:39

downtick · 01/03/2025 14:47

It's important to recognise that since 2008 Ukraine has been working with NATO to obtain formal membership.

Russia warned time and time again of "consequences" to Ukrainian and partners of NATO membership. In 2014 Russia annexed Crimea and since interfered politically to try and change the direction in Ukraine. Unfortunately the calls for Ukrainian demands to join NATO just grew louder escalating the situation.

If you're old enough you may recall how the USA reacted to Russian missiles being placed in Cuba, that episode was the closest this planet got the WW3.

For the sake of our planet and all humanity, Ukraine cannot be a member of NATO. Ukraine accepting this is a required first step to ending this rotten war.

The year 2008 rings a bell. I wonder why it might be significant...

Oh yeah, the year that Russia invaded Georgia, annexing South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

If Russia doesn‘t want other countries to form defensive alliances, perhaps it should stop giving them reasons to defend themselves.

GRex · 03/03/2025 15:41

Hopefully it will all be back on track soon @deeppremium. It is useful sometimes to remember that however much Russia is an irritant, they have far lower resources than they pretend, resources that are being eroded daily by the war they started. We need to unite with our allies, and the US is a good ally, but we do not necessarily need them (Trump and co seem keen to remind us of this). Happily the European leaders are in broad agreement.

Wildflowers99 · 07/03/2025 07:28

GRex · 03/03/2025 15:41

Hopefully it will all be back on track soon @deeppremium. It is useful sometimes to remember that however much Russia is an irritant, they have far lower resources than they pretend, resources that are being eroded daily by the war they started. We need to unite with our allies, and the US is a good ally, but we do not necessarily need them (Trump and co seem keen to remind us of this). Happily the European leaders are in broad agreement.

Agree, any kind of pressure taken off now would result in them rearming.

Tomikka · 07/03/2025 07:49

Foodtimeisit · 01/03/2025 13:20

I am pretty familiar with European history and how it goes for the common people. Solution should be world peace not war.

If you’re familiar with European history then you are aware that a key part of the end of the Cold War, stopping nuclear proliferation and a major part of nuclear disarmament was Ukraine disarming the largest part of the Soviet Unions nuclear arsenal?

Under that disarmament of Ukraine was given guarantees of its security and sovereign integrity by Russia, the UK and the US

Putin has broken that promise, Trump has reneged on that promise.
Only the UK remains taking our word seriously

….. and we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine.

The USA was the largest single entity, the rest have contributed more.
Trump has opened up a wide hole in that support

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 13:28

For those who think that Trump is just working to get peace, you're very much in a minority. 78% of Brits consider Trump to be a threat to peace and security in Europe. A majority would support the deployment of British troops in a peacekeeping role.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/06/donald-trump-threat-to-peace-ukraine-talks-survey-western-europeans

Wordsmithery · 07/03/2025 13:36

Foodtimeisit · 01/03/2025 13:13

I didn't realise there are so many war hungry people here.
I think the solution should be diplomatic negotiations and peace.

There have been plenty of cogent arguments here, hardly evidence of war-hungry MNers...
I'm passionately anti-war in principle but Putin didn't allow any room for diplomacy and peace and of course Trump is making things ten thousand times worse. Sometimes you have to fight to defend yourself, as is the case here. There are such strong parallels with Hitler. Do you think we shouldn't have stopped him either?

Lyannaa · 07/03/2025 13:50

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 13:28

For those who think that Trump is just working to get peace, you're very much in a minority. 78% of Brits consider Trump to be a threat to peace and security in Europe. A majority would support the deployment of British troops in a peacekeeping role.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/06/donald-trump-threat-to-peace-ukraine-talks-survey-western-europeans

Exactly, Trump just tells lies all the time. He's only interested in what suits him. He has, for many years, supported Putin's ideas about what should happen in Ukraine.

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:12

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 13:28

For those who think that Trump is just working to get peace, you're very much in a minority. 78% of Brits consider Trump to be a threat to peace and security in Europe. A majority would support the deployment of British troops in a peacekeeping role.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/06/donald-trump-threat-to-peace-ukraine-talks-survey-western-europeans

The article says 1165 Brits, not 78 percent of Brits! I think you may be jumping the gun slightly!

Who were the 2263 they interviewed, just out of interest? How were they selected?

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:17

Tomikka · 07/03/2025 07:49

If you’re familiar with European history then you are aware that a key part of the end of the Cold War, stopping nuclear proliferation and a major part of nuclear disarmament was Ukraine disarming the largest part of the Soviet Unions nuclear arsenal?

Under that disarmament of Ukraine was given guarantees of its security and sovereign integrity by Russia, the UK and the US

Putin has broken that promise, Trump has reneged on that promise.
Only the UK remains taking our word seriously

….. and we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine.

The USA was the largest single entity, the rest have contributed more.
Trump has opened up a wide hole in that support

When you say "Only the UK remains taking our word seriously
….. and we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine" what do you mean by we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine? Do you mean other western european countries, or someone else?

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 14:25

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:12

The article says 1165 Brits, not 78 percent of Brits! I think you may be jumping the gun slightly!

Who were the 2263 they interviewed, just out of interest? How were they selected?

The article doesn't say 1165 at all. Where on earth did you get that number from?

After Trump’s apparent alignment with Russia, the polling, carried out between 26 February and 4 March, found majorities in all five countries believed the US president had become a “very big or fairly big threat to peace and security in Europe”. That sentiment was weakest in Italy at 58%, rising to 69% in France, 74% in Germany, 75% in Spain and 78% in the UK.

Yougov is a reputable pollster and will weigh samples to reflect the general population.

Primary source for the poll: https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/51741-where-does-western-europe-stand-on-ukraine-donald-trump-and-national-defence

Where does Western Europe stand on Ukraine, Donald Trump and national defence? | YouGov

People in the five largest European nations see the US president as a threat to peace and security on the continent

https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/51741-where-does-western-europe-stand-on-ukraine-donald-trump-and-national-defence

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:47

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 14:25

The article doesn't say 1165 at all. Where on earth did you get that number from?

After Trump’s apparent alignment with Russia, the polling, carried out between 26 February and 4 March, found majorities in all five countries believed the US president had become a “very big or fairly big threat to peace and security in Europe”. That sentiment was weakest in Italy at 58%, rising to 69% in France, 74% in Germany, 75% in Spain and 78% in the UK.

Yougov is a reputable pollster and will weigh samples to reflect the general population.

Primary source for the poll: https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/51741-where-does-western-europe-stand-on-ukraine-donald-trump-and-national-defence

The article says 2263 brits were interviewed, 78 percent of that number is 1165.

We need to get some sort of referendum done to get a clear idea of what the UK thinks - that would really give a strong idea and backing. 2263 is just too tiny a number to be compelling. Do you think we should organise a referendum?

In any event, does it say anywhere how the 2263 were selected? Sorry, I haven't read your link yet if it is there.

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:53

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:47

The article says 2263 brits were interviewed, 78 percent of that number is 1165.

We need to get some sort of referendum done to get a clear idea of what the UK thinks - that would really give a strong idea and backing. 2263 is just too tiny a number to be compelling. Do you think we should organise a referendum?

In any event, does it say anywhere how the 2263 were selected? Sorry, I haven't read your link yet if it is there.

Edited

I just had a quick squizz and it looks like the sample (the 2263 people) is self selected; if you want to give your view you apply to join yougov. Not sure how yougov weight, but the weighted and non weighted figures look like they are the same. Interesting stuff! Thanks for linking.

DdraigGoch · 07/03/2025 14:57

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:47

The article says 2263 brits were interviewed, 78 percent of that number is 1165.

We need to get some sort of referendum done to get a clear idea of what the UK thinks - that would really give a strong idea and backing. 2263 is just too tiny a number to be compelling. Do you think we should organise a referendum?

In any event, does it say anywhere how the 2263 were selected? Sorry, I haven't read your link yet if it is there.

Edited

Where did you learn maths? I'd be asking for a refund if I was you. 1165 is not 78% of 2263.

Having a bigger sample wouldn't guarantee that it is representative. In 1936 The Literary Digest surveyed 2.38 million Americans. They predicted that FDR would lose by a reasonable margin to the Republican candidate. In reality FDR won by a landslide.

Are you seriously suggesting that we organise a national referendum on the question of "Is Donald Trump a threat to European peace and security?"

What a waste of time and money.

Tomikka · 07/03/2025 15:19

deeppremium · 07/03/2025 14:17

When you say "Only the UK remains taking our word seriously
….. and we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine" what do you mean by we are not the only ones supporting Ukraine? Do you mean other western european countries, or someone else?

Of the guarantee made to Ukraine on their nuclear disarmament - by Russia, USA and the UK
Only the UK remains “keeping our word” to Ukraine

Or in other words - the Budapest memorandum

https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280401fbb

Note the ….. that I included with regards to others who are supporting Ukraine today

(My post was in response to “why should the UK be supporting Ukraine” - because WE promised them we would - WE being the UK)

UNTC

https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280401fbb

CasperGutman · 07/03/2025 15:19

It would make no sense for Trump to oppose UK+EU spending more on defence, as he's long been calling for NATO powers on this side of the Atlantic to do this. Of course, something making no sense hasn't always stopped the orange feller.

In terms of affordability, the EU+UK has something like five times the population and fifteen times the GDP of Russia. Building and maintaining a defence capability sufficient to deter Russian aggression should be well within the capability of our economies. I sincerely hope this can be done without the need to actually fight a 'hot' war with boots on the ground.

The actual cost will be much less than the headline figures, as the money will largely be spent at home, training and employing people in highly skilled roles in the defence industries, and will then circulate in the wider economy. As options for providing Keynesian economic stimulus go, it's got to be better than paying people to dig holes and fill them in again!

GRex · 07/03/2025 15:25

It's a handful ofpeople regardless of maths capability...

While his actions have been disappointing and we expect and hope that Trump will work better with the US's allies soon enough, he has not yet invaded anywhere. Russia have. The USA are not actually obliged to protect European countries from Russia, and should not be blamed for concern about what actions Russia will take next.

Wishyouwerehere50 · 07/03/2025 17:13

My political acumen is limited, as is my economic awareness here, so I'm happy to be re educated for any ignorance here 😬.

I watched that fab BBC documentary about Zelensky. Yes I know propaganda exists. There definitely is compelling evidence however for me to have a position on this......

There's alot going on in the UK pissing people of. COL issues and how people feel their tax money is being managed is the number one issue I see continually. So that will drive opinions. If there's a way to say well this Ukraine stuff isn't justifiable and because of all my personal financial woes I am comfortable to disagree with it - of course people will jump on it.

I think if I had a child in the Army and had to think about them being sent to war. Well there are so many issues right now where I would be saying NO WAY. This situation, I can tell you, I would say morally, for our own benefit also, your participation in that as a soldier, I support and accept.

Putin and his psychology and ' plan' is absolutely terrifying and a threat to democracy and all of us. His approach to complete control, domination and destruction of a group of Western inclined people ( Ukraine) disgusts me to the core. It is a threat to our entire way of life.

That round face will NOT stop with Ukraine. It will grow unless he is assassinated. I can't understand how that has not yet been achieved yet.

So yes, it is something in our interests to absolutely jump on.

I need to understand more about this Oligarch Russian frozen asset situation and how that is proposedly going to fund things. Sounds great but I accept that is not so simple. There will be a price to pay also.

Trump is behaving like a psychopath. If he isn't sociopathy he is a psychopath. So that's also scary for us. Aligning against America. I wonder what price one would pay for that.

Because people are upset about the immigrants on boats situation, it isn't helping this. I see people are thinking, sort that crap out and maybe we can get behind this other problem!

I actually get that.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page