Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed about this attempt at splitting the bill

229 replies

SpottyPotties · 17/02/2025 00:14

We went out for a family meal today, which we do maybe 6/7 times a year. Myself, DH and DS (18), DB1, DPs and DB2, SIL and their DC (10 & 15).

When the DC were younger and eating kids meals, we used to split the bill per adult. Everyone has always been more than happy splitting a £6.99 kids meal amongst the adults.

As the DCs are getting older, we have started to split per person, based on who has had an adult meal. As our DC are the eldest, we have led this.

Today, my niece and nephew both had adult meals, a few drinks each and hot chocolates after. DS had a poke bowl which cost less than everyone else’s and a jug of water (his choice - he’s in to the gym and nutrition).

The bill came and DB picked it up and declared we were splitting per adult, so counting my DS as an adult, and not including his DC. I was more than happy to split per person, even though ours would have cost less overall, but I wasn’t happy with having to pay more in total than DB who had an extra person to us.

I said that wasn’t really fair and we did eventually end up splitting per person, but he and SIL were obviously annoyed about it, so AIBU in wanting to split per person, rather than per adult?

DB definitely does not have money worries so this isn’t his reasoning. If he was struggling, I’d be more than happy to put a bit extra in to help him out.

OP posts:
LittleBigHead · 17/02/2025 05:16

MolkosTeenageAngst · 17/02/2025 00:18

Not unreasonable to split per person if everybody has had an adult’s meal and eaten a similar amount, even if some in the group are children or teens. Obviously in a case where there is a cheap kids menu and they haven’t ordered an adults meal it would be different, but in your scenario you were not being unreasonable.

Even in the scenario of children having the children’s meals in my family it’s usual that parents pay for their DCs’ meals.

LillyPJ · 17/02/2025 05:24

This is why I hate eating out in a big group! If I'm with a group of friends, I prefer to pay for my own meal. If I was with my children and my brother's family, I'd pay for my family and he'd pay for his.

AnnoyedAsAllHeck · 17/02/2025 05:24

Mum2So · 17/02/2025 00:31

All families are different, I know, but when it comes to my family, we all take turns paying. Sometimes my parents take care of the bill. Sometimes my siblings pay for everyone (we all have children). Other times, my DH or I pay for everyone. I wouldn't ever insist on counting minors v adults and who ate what, etc. However, none of us need to watch what we spend, but if we did I am sure we would simply not attend dinner and go the next time. My siblings all have more children than I do, but I would never dream of calculating what they ate or drank. We're a tight family - and yes, we have our fallouts at times - but I love every one of them and it's a pleasure to all be together, and that's priceless (but worth paying for!).

And everyone clapped.

Thunderpants88 · 17/02/2025 05:25

SpottyPotties · 17/02/2025 00:14

We went out for a family meal today, which we do maybe 6/7 times a year. Myself, DH and DS (18), DB1, DPs and DB2, SIL and their DC (10 & 15).

When the DC were younger and eating kids meals, we used to split the bill per adult. Everyone has always been more than happy splitting a £6.99 kids meal amongst the adults.

As the DCs are getting older, we have started to split per person, based on who has had an adult meal. As our DC are the eldest, we have led this.

Today, my niece and nephew both had adult meals, a few drinks each and hot chocolates after. DS had a poke bowl which cost less than everyone else’s and a jug of water (his choice - he’s in to the gym and nutrition).

The bill came and DB picked it up and declared we were splitting per adult, so counting my DS as an adult, and not including his DC. I was more than happy to split per person, even though ours would have cost less overall, but I wasn’t happy with having to pay more in total than DB who had an extra person to us.

I said that wasn’t really fair and we did eventually end up splitting per person, but he and SIL were obviously annoyed about it, so AIBU in wanting to split per person, rather than per adult?

DB definitely does not have money worries so this isn’t his reasoning. If he was struggling, I’d be more than happy to put a bit extra in to help him out.

Well done you for saying something here. That was really rude of them!

How did the conversation go?

Differentstarts · 17/02/2025 05:27

I think when it starts getting awkward like this just say where paying for our own family

AnnoyedAsAllHeck · 17/02/2025 05:36

SpottyPotties · 17/02/2025 02:47

It’s not about the validation at all. I was asking if I was being unreasonable to be annoyed at how DB tried to split the bill. If everyone had come on and said regardless of cost, DB was being perfectly reasonable to expect his under 16’s to be split amongst the adults, I would have adjusted my expectations for next time.

Im not sure why you’re trying to make it about something it’s not?

Because it's in some people's nature to be like that. They feel the "need" to feel superior, not realizing they just look like jackholes. 🙄

There are always a few, everywhere. 😉

AnnoyedAsAllHeck · 17/02/2025 06:06

beenonthebox · 17/02/2025 02:52

Im not sure why you’re trying to make it about something it’s not?

Probably because I've been bedridden for three days, have slept through most of it and can sleep no more which is why I'm on here, and I'm so jealous of others who were well enough to go out and have a nice time with family after I had to cancel my plans. So in a word, jealousy. That and boredom. So two words, actually. 😆

I apologize for my above post @beenonthebox I hadn't refreshed the page so missed this post and replied before I did.

I hope you are feeling better now. Just getting over Covid here and pretty sure I've left my lungs up into my ears.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 17/02/2025 06:15

niadainud · 17/02/2025 05:15

That's all very well in principle, but do you still apply that when one "family" is a single adult and another is a family of six with four teenagers?

Does one party have to be massively subsidised for it to be a joyous occasion?

Huh?
family A: 4 people, pays for their 4 meals
family B: 6 people, pays for their 6 meals
family C: 2 people, pays for their 2 meals
etc
Not, split the bill evenly by 12 and then pay one share per person in each family. Just pay the actal amount of the meal/drinks each member if your own family had.

arcticpandas · 17/02/2025 06:24

Well done OP for standing up to DB. It seems like he's got form for being CF so be consistent in reining him in.

prelovedusername · 17/02/2025 06:42

In your situation I would have done split per family from the outset. They sound mean and penny pinching. In our family everyone is so keen to pay we regularly have a Mrs Doyle situation and it’s not unknown for money to be sent back and forth online.

AndThereSheGoes · 17/02/2025 06:50

Mumtobabyhavoc · 17/02/2025 06:15

Huh?
family A: 4 people, pays for their 4 meals
family B: 6 people, pays for their 6 meals
family C: 2 people, pays for their 2 meals
etc
Not, split the bill evenly by 12 and then pay one share per person in each family. Just pay the actal amount of the meal/drinks each member if your own family had.

These are not random families they are all one family.

So previous maybe grandparents don't mind paying more and subsiding their kids and grandkids. Same with the childless brother - cheaper paying a bit towards nieces and nephews at a big meal then taking them out himself.

I agree with you that now everyone is on adult meals it needs a rethink. We normally do some sort of rounding up/ down thing depending on who had the most expensive meals/ wine.

MyDeftDuck · 17/02/2025 06:51

Enough4me · 17/02/2025 00:28

He's a cheeky f**ker. I'm glad you stood up for your family, you don't need to subsidise them.

This
And this is why it is often advisable to have enough cash to pay for your own family group including drinks and tips.

Couple of years ago BIL decided to arrange a lunch date for 6 of us on what would have been their late dad's birthday - no problem with that and it was agreed from the outset that we would go dutch. However, BIL and partner both had 3 courses plus countless drinks and then miraculously had forgotten his wallet. The other couple (he had also got no money, surprise surprise) and us two just had 2 courses and one drink each. Therefore my OH and I were left to foot the very big bill - the other two couples assured us they would send their money over via Internet banking when they got home - we are still waiting.

I will help anyone who is on the bones of their arse, but I will not tolerate a freeloader who I know can afford to pay but forgets to pay.

CurlewKate · 17/02/2025 06:52

How much difference did it make to your bill?

discdiscsnap · 17/02/2025 06:59

We have 1 chijd, sil/bil have 1 child. When we go out as a group with Pil we just she lit the bill three ways. If we had more kids than sil we would pay more.

CatsWhiskerz · 17/02/2025 07:00

These days it's more about the per adult meal than the age of the children as it's not 8..99 any longer

HiptotheHopp · 17/02/2025 07:00

beenonthebox · 17/02/2025 02:32

I may be very, very out of touch, but even as an adult I wouldn't spend £50 a meal on myself...are his two children really consuming £100's worth of food between them? Where on earth is this?

You are very out of touch.

Onceachunkymonkey · 17/02/2025 07:01

I’m on the fence, yes he was cheeky, but you clearly went many years with your parents and other brothers partially paying for your kids, and didn’t seem to take issue, you’ve only taken issue when you had to pay more.

maybe cut from the same cloth?

SwanOfThoseThings · 17/02/2025 07:13

Splitting the bill only works if all diners genuinely don't mind the possibility of overpaying for the sake of convenience. I.e. if the time spent working out what everyone owes is not worth the amount you might save by doing this and there isn't going to be resentment because Sue didn't have a starter; Bill had the fillet steak; Jenny only had a salad and a glass of water; Bob had three courses, a side and and four pints of beer ...

It doesn't sound like that is the case here, particularly with the complication of 'paying per adult' while having DC in the mix who might or might not be eating the equivalent of an adult meal, so paying for what you had is the obvious way forward.

TwinkleLights24 · 17/02/2025 07:18

Each family should pay for their own group of people.

Sunnysideup4eva · 17/02/2025 07:19

SpottyPotties · 17/02/2025 02:18

I’m surprised that people would go out with family and have the poor staff taking 4 different orders. I can begin to imagine the hassle of adding drinks on. And how would you start splitting a bottle of wine? Whose bill does that go on?

Our system has always worked for us. I would offer to pay for kids meals and everyone else would say don’t be silly. DB1 would offer to pay extra because he’d had a bottle of wine, and again we’d all say don’t worry about it.

Up until now, everyone has had whatever they’ve wanted whenever we’ve gone out and we’ve all been happy. Until DB wants to palm off half his bill!

Is it so difficult for your family to each tot up the costs of what you've had, using the prices listed in the menu? Surely this is what most families do who want to pay fairly when in diverse family groupings with kids etc.
You just sit and spend 5 min at the end working out what you owe, it's quite basic maths?

rookiemere · 17/02/2025 07:21

As soon as DCs start eating adult meals, then that's when bill paying split needs to change.

We had this as we have one DC and went on holiday with two other families with 2 DCs each. When they were little I was happy enough to split the bills 3 ways when we went out, but when their DCs started drinking multiple cans of coke and eating adult portions of moules frites, whilst DS ( a simple soul at the time) was still on water and a children's meal, it would have been nice if they had suggested a different split of the bill rather than leaving me in exasperation to eventually mention it.

fingerbobz · 17/02/2025 07:32

Dpends what alcohol was involved too

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 17/02/2025 07:37

TheIvyRestaurant · 17/02/2025 02:39

A 10yo has a 2 course meal followed by coffee?!

The problem is children’s meals are often very small (my toddlers eat them) so I can see that a 20 year boy wouldn’t want that. A lot of places only allow them if you are under 12 or 10 anyway.
And if people are getting desserts it’s pretty normal for a 10 year old to want one and get one.

IlooklikeNigella · 17/02/2025 07:38

UGH! It sounds like you've had a nice vibe going for years with everybody getting a fair deal and now your CF greedy DB2 and SIL are ruining it all.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 17/02/2025 07:39

I have 2 little children so normally class them as 1 person when it comes to splitting bills

Swipe left for the next trending thread