And here's another fallacy about car ownership, posted in big bold letters on Mumsnet like it's gospel.
@User19876536484 you are just wrong about no bigger financial commitment. No one who buys cars used should just look at the sticker price as the final cost.
Yes you can pick up a used Range Rover Sport (first generation) for a couple of thousand. Or a Mitsubishi Shogun, or a Discovery 3 etc...
..and I'm only speaking of the proper 4x4s here, not the comical hatchbacks in cosplay.
But after you've spent those few thousand...
You'll have much larger bills for transfer box, suspension, timing belt, old diesel engines failing and needing a £10k repair (which usually means the car goes back on Autotrader for £1500 with the "needs a bit of work, easy fix" lie) , main bearing collapse..
And that's not including the known issues with things like oil contaminating the engine causing failure, or my favourite is the fact that with a giant 2.5 tonne SUV, you're going to need to price in running costs for 20 inch tyres, regular suspension refreshes (especially if you have the desirable but prone-to-failure air suspension on some of the older models)
... You just can't compare the running costs of these class of cars, with a Touran, or a Galaxy, or a Passat.
Yeah they might look all nice and rufty tufty for some of you, but they will drain your wallet and still look like an old heap. If you like that kind of thing, crack right on.