Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is 45 too old to have a baby

767 replies

Catontoof · 09/02/2025 12:22

is this fair on a child?
I am seriously considering this as I feel like
therr has been a huge hole in my life.

OP posts:
SallyWD · 14/02/2025 11:51

InMyMNEra · 14/02/2025 11:34

I agree that it’s a bit of a myth. My younger colleagues are all middle class professionals. They pretty much all seem have their babies in their early- mid 30s. Maybe second or 3rd babies at 35+, but it’s only on Mumsnet that it seems common to have babies in your early and mid 40s.

I agree, I know a very middle class crowd and they were all pretty concerned about not having babies too late. A few of them said they wanted to be done and dusted by 35 because the risks increase after that age.

InMyMNEra · 14/02/2025 11:52

@JumpinJellyfish yes, but even if the reception mums were 40+, I bet many of them still had their babies in their 30s.

I remember some reception mums being pregnant again in their 40s, but it was definitely unusual

I work with a huge team of women. I can’t think of a person who had a baby after 40.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 14/02/2025 11:59

If professional women decide on waiting until their 40's, late 30's, freeze your eggs in your early 30's. 25 if possible.

The guilt having a child with health conditions is immense. I was 35 having DS, most of his issues are genetics though I do feel responsible for not knowing that DH and I were carrying a somatic mutant gene.

With his ASD, I question my moods throughout pregnancy, what I ate, did I exercise enough.

If you do have a disabled child in your 40's, it's a long road to walk, physically and mentally.

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 12:05

Egg freezing is not guaranteed.

The HFEA measures success based on how many embryos (developed from frozen eggs) result in a live birth. Using this measure, 19% of IVF treatments using a patient's own frozen eggs were successful in 2017.

ARingtoit · 14/02/2025 12:11

JumpinJellyfish · 14/02/2025 11:00

@ARingtoit I mix in similar circles and am regarded as practically a gymslip mum for having had dc1 at 31 - means that I have a completely warped sense of my own age 🤣

gasp but a mere teenager!

PumpkinScarf · 14/02/2025 12:14

My children will be 16 and 14 when I’m 45 I couldn’t fathom having a baby at that age it’s hard enough when you’re relatively young.

ARingtoit · 14/02/2025 12:15

Comedycook · 14/02/2025 11:25

I had my first at 26...my social circle is very middle class...I felt like a teen mum

It's crazy! My 32 year old friend said she felt self conscious like people were judging her for being too young 😂. Our girls' school did this to us by terrifying us about getting pregnant!

Gettingbysomehow · 14/02/2025 12:17

I would never do this, I'm 63 and my DS is 42. It's ideal, he was an incredibly easy and laid back baby, but my siblings had babies in their 40s and are very happy.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 14/02/2025 12:48

It's crazy! My 32 year old friend said she felt self conscious like people were judging her for being too young
That is weird.
Do you think the mentality stunts maturity?
Once again, the women in your friendship base serious life choices on what is socially acceptable in your group.
Very silly, especially if they want children while feeling 35 is too young.
I suppose they can afford fertility treatment etc, all unnecessary practices needed because your friendship group is so well adjusted, having travelled etc.

Comedycook · 14/02/2025 12:58

ARingtoit · 14/02/2025 12:15

It's crazy! My 32 year old friend said she felt self conscious like people were judging her for being too young 😂. Our girls' school did this to us by terrifying us about getting pregnant!

Oh I went to a girls school too in the 1990s....it was drummed into us relentlessly that the absolute worst thing you could ever do is get pregnant....to the extent I know women from there who felt terrified to tell their parents they were pregnant when they are married and in their late 30s! It still feels so naughty. It's mad.

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 14/02/2025 13:32

Comedycook · 13/02/2025 20:01

You must be made of stronger stuff than me 😂

I thought that too. First one at 17, last one at nearly 40! Basically 50 years of parenting. No thanks! 😱

Either one or the other, have them at 17-27 say, and then stop. OR start at 31/32, and stop at say 39/40.

Each to their own. I know a woman who had 2 children at 18 and 20. Had another 2 children at 30 and 32. Then another 2 children at 41 and 43.

25 years between the oldest and the youngest, and when the last 2 children of the 6 were born, they were already aunt and uncle to 2 nephews and a niece!

The mum has always been as happy as a pig in shite though! An absolute earth mother. More patience than I have ever had!

!

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 14/02/2025 13:40

There are some fucking daft posts/daft attitudes on here though. 'Too young to be a first time mum at 31-32?!' WTF, 29 is the average age of a first time mum! And calling someone a 'gymslip mum' for having her first baby at 26. FFS! Hmm

Waiting til your 40s to start trying for a baby is nothing to be proud of. I'm not saying it's something to be ashamed of, but it's nothing to be proud of either. It doesn't make you a better person if you had your first baby at 38-42, than someone who had their first at 18-22.

Conversely, gymslip mum is right up there with 'spinster' and 'maiden' and 'courting' and 'with child.' Have we been transported back to the 1960s?!

InMyMNEra · 14/02/2025 13:51

I certainly wouldn’t consider a 32 year old mum of a baby to be young. It’s a fact that a woman’s fertility begins its decline at age 32.

JoyousGreyOrca · 14/02/2025 13:54

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 14/02/2025 13:40

There are some fucking daft posts/daft attitudes on here though. 'Too young to be a first time mum at 31-32?!' WTF, 29 is the average age of a first time mum! And calling someone a 'gymslip mum' for having her first baby at 26. FFS! Hmm

Waiting til your 40s to start trying for a baby is nothing to be proud of. I'm not saying it's something to be ashamed of, but it's nothing to be proud of either. It doesn't make you a better person if you had your first baby at 38-42, than someone who had their first at 18-22.

Conversely, gymslip mum is right up there with 'spinster' and 'maiden' and 'courting' and 'with child.' Have we been transported back to the 1960s?!

Totally agree.
I think if you really want a child, do not wait until your forties. Sure lots of women do have a child, but lots also find they left it too late.

doodahdayy · 14/02/2025 14:05

Gettingbysomehow · 14/02/2025 12:17

I would never do this, I'm 63 and my DS is 42. It's ideal, he was an incredibly easy and laid back baby, but my siblings had babies in their 40s and are very happy.

Edited

Same age gap as me and my mum. She's 61 and I'm 42. She's fit and full of energy. I had mine older 35 and 40 so it's the other end of the scale. Both have their benefits and drawbacks I think

doodahdayy · 14/02/2025 14:07

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 14/02/2025 13:40

There are some fucking daft posts/daft attitudes on here though. 'Too young to be a first time mum at 31-32?!' WTF, 29 is the average age of a first time mum! And calling someone a 'gymslip mum' for having her first baby at 26. FFS! Hmm

Waiting til your 40s to start trying for a baby is nothing to be proud of. I'm not saying it's something to be ashamed of, but it's nothing to be proud of either. It doesn't make you a better person if you had your first baby at 38-42, than someone who had their first at 18-22.

Conversely, gymslip mum is right up there with 'spinster' and 'maiden' and 'courting' and 'with child.' Have we been transported back to the 1960s?!

Yeah it's ridiculous. I had mine at 35 and 40. Currently on maternity leave with my second and I've only seen one mum in any of the classes I go to who is older than me. I'm in London and these are nice areas. Most are 30 or early 30s. Early 30s is not too young.

Richtea67 · 14/02/2025 14:20

40 was too old for me! My baby didn't sleep unless held upright for the first 8 weeks, them woke up every 1-2 hours for the next 2 years! She's only now just sleeping better aged 2.5 (1 waking most nights). I'm absolutely exhausted, and dealing with a defiant toddler plus older children when peri menopausal is really hard.

HamptonPlace · 14/02/2025 15:14

BIossomtoes · 11/02/2025 11:40

Not remotely grim. The two who immediately come to mind are a very senior professional woman and the other is the owner of a booming equine business. What’s grim about young parenthood? There’s a lot of life left when your kids grow up if you have them young.

But that's 4 generations of teenage parenthood, or at least a couple. IMHO teenagers shouldn't be having children... But maybe others disagree

BIossomtoes · 14/02/2025 15:57

HamptonPlace · 14/02/2025 15:14

But that's 4 generations of teenage parenthood, or at least a couple. IMHO teenagers shouldn't be having children... But maybe others disagree

Not necessarily - three generations of becoming parents in early 20s = great grandparents in their 60s. No teenage parents involved.

Kindofembarrasing · 14/02/2025 17:01

HamptonPlace · 14/02/2025 15:14

But that's 4 generations of teenage parenthood, or at least a couple. IMHO teenagers shouldn't be having children... But maybe others disagree

Why is it grim? Big difference between 13 and 19. 19 is generally fine, 13 obviously isn't but I wouldn't say grim I'd just say sad as they've most likely been abused by a much older man.

(I became a parent at 16 and think I've done a pretty good job of it)

PyongyangKipperbang · 14/02/2025 17:30

HamptonPlace · 14/02/2025 15:14

But that's 4 generations of teenage parenthood, or at least a couple. IMHO teenagers shouldn't be having children... But maybe others disagree

My grandmother and all of her DD's had been married with at least one child by 25. My mother was 22 when she had me and had been married 2 years by then. Marrying as a late teen or very early 20's was the norm rather than the exception until relatively recently. Marrying later coincided with more rights and opportunities for women, with good jobs and financial freedom there was no need to marry young.

My Grandmother became a great grandmother at 62. No teenagers involved, not until later and that was me, one of the youngest grandchildren.

abracadabra1980 · 14/02/2025 22:24

Cynic17 · 09/02/2025 12:28

I don't know whether 45 is too old to have a baby, but I'm pretty sure that 60 is way too old to have a 15 year old! Think long- term, OP, because it's really not about those first few months with a cute little baby.....

This.

theDudesmummy · 15/02/2025 11:27

I'm not "proud of waiting" until I was 45 to have my baby. That's just when it happened, after a first marriage in which it wasn't possible and then multiple losses in my second marriage.

Why is 60 too old to have a 15 year old? I'm 61.

HamptonPlace · 18/02/2025 10:40

PyongyangKipperbang · 14/02/2025 17:30

My grandmother and all of her DD's had been married with at least one child by 25. My mother was 22 when she had me and had been married 2 years by then. Marrying as a late teen or very early 20's was the norm rather than the exception until relatively recently. Marrying later coincided with more rights and opportunities for women, with good jobs and financial freedom there was no need to marry young.

My Grandmother became a great grandmother at 62. No teenagers involved, not until later and that was me, one of the youngest grandchildren.

so if all the mothers were 20y8m that makes a GG at 62.. does seem awful young, albeit of course totally understand norms were different a long long time ago...

privatenonamegiven · 18/02/2025 19:19

theDudesmummy · 15/02/2025 11:27

I'm not "proud of waiting" until I was 45 to have my baby. That's just when it happened, after a first marriage in which it wasn't possible and then multiple losses in my second marriage.

Why is 60 too old to have a 15 year old? I'm 61.

It isn't too old at all... people talk nonsense to put it politely.

Also I feel people are much more critical of women regarding this sort of thing... I rarely see people saying being 45 is too old to be a dad!

I would much rather have older parents who care about me than younger ones who don't give a sh*t.

Long life is not guaranteed, my mother was 18 when she had me and drop dead before I got to 40!

Swipe left for the next trending thread