Grooming gangs being labelled as "Muslim grooming gangs"

[Olga009933]

Why is religious heritage of child sex offenders only mentioned in headlines when the offenders are of south Asian and predominantly Muslim heritage.
Why not just label them as "grooming gangs" or "Asian grooming gangs" (if wanting to be be specific).
Just thinking and wondering about the thousands of white British and presumably non-Muslim sex offenders who make the news. How many of them are labelled "Christian sex attacker" or "Jewish pervert" etc? Why is the religious heritage of a sex offender only mentioned why the offenders are of Muslim background?
If mentioning religion for one particular demographic then surely its only fair to mention the religious heritage of them all?

Yes, where the gangs are Muslim, I do support them being described as such. I was giving another example, outside of the Pakistani groups.
I don't agree with them being called " Asian". I remember a Sikh man writing to the Times and requesting that they did not refer to them as " Asian".
( I do realise that belonging to Sikhism is not a nationality).

Fair enough.

This is criminal. So much for ," care".

Our Pakistani neighbour actually told my husband to keep me in line. Husband was very amused at the thought of even trying to attempt it. Apparently I don't know my place.

There is no other justification for a quota that let's most rapists walk free on purpose to fudge data. If you want to justify cases being NFA'd on purpose then by all means explain why!

How did you know they weren't Indian or Bengali or Hindu?

The vast majority of young men who openly sexually harassed and intimidated me were white and I assume Christian heritage.

Disappointed that I misread the thread title and this is not about mushroom grooming gangs 😕

How do you know they weren't Indian or Bengali or Hindu?

You do realise that most people can tell the difference between different ethnicities don’t you? It is also pretty easy to make accurate assumptions about those ethnicities religions.

Good try with the Christian angle. But given the differences as to the demographic split of Islam and Christianity in the UK its most likely the people you claim to have been harrasssrd by (assuming neither female or over 50) it’s more likely than not they weren’t Christian

Our Pakistani neighbour brought me food every day for over a week after DD was born

I’ve lived in Romania ( in the 90s) and I believe you. The Romanians felt westerners were very naive about the Roma. Certainly, not all are criminal but some families/ clans have ways of making money ( dislocating their kids shoulders to make them look crippled and beg, offering girl children for sex, selling children) that would make you blanch.

No muslim would be involved in grooming gangs. It goes against Allah.

It's no different to the Triple K calling themselves Christians.

These are just depraved, disgusting individuals..all of them.
Sorry to go off on a tangent but I really wish society could have an honest and open debate on why (mainly) men behave like this, and the triggers that cause them to do deplorable things.

I think it's less concerning what hue did what...I want to know why are most atrocities caused by men, worldwide?

They, the, convicted claim they are Muslim though, it’s not all Muslims, but enough that an estimated 4,000 young girls have been raped and tortured.

I can see lots of well meaning posters on here and quite a few trying to plead ignorance for the sake of keeping face. I have had Muslim men and women friends, tell me it’s happening in the towns and cities I grew up in and around and how to keep safe.

It’s absolutely diabolical that any one would try and defend this by trying to deflect, lots of other groups of people, yes indeed, do commit similar crimes, all of it is based on misogyny, but the fuel for this misogyny is seemingly religious and of a particular faith.

It how they excuse their own behaviour and feel zero remorse for their crimes again a young girls

Khan predictably has issues talking about this in London www.standard.co.uk/news/london/grooming-gangs-london-mayor-sadiq-khan-stonewalling-tory-questions-b1205508.html

Typical slithering snake

He was desperate to be able to turn this round to claim victimhood. He doesn’t give a shit about the girls that actually are the victims of these rape gangs Susan Hall did a great job there.

We should definitely take a moment to worry about how we label a bunch of rapists so we get the words just right. Even if that means we have to obscure the actual facts of who the rapists are because, fuck it, it's super awkward being a liberal sometimes.

Let's not worry about the victims apart from a few throw-away statements and platitudes.

This thread has reached a new all-time low.

That has nothing to do with the girls being abused now.

Slavery was common all over the world then as it is now. That is not the reason why there are grooming and raping gangs now.

@Feelingathomenow that sadiq clip is blood boiling.

It is, isn't it. So disrespectful.

It also felt bullying, smarmy and utterly vicious when we think of the sensitivity of the subject.

Sadiq Khan is a misogynist.

Obvious SK wanted her to say Muslim or Asian gangs so he could question her use of this

Glad she didn’t fall for it

shame on him

YY @HRTQueen