Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Grooming gangs being labelled as "Muslim grooming gangs"

1000 replies

Olga009933 · 19/01/2025 17:48

Why is religious heritage of child sex offenders only mentioned in headlines when the offenders are of south Asian and predominantly Muslim heritage.
Why not just label them as "grooming gangs" or "Asian grooming gangs" (if wanting to be be specific).
Just thinking and wondering about the thousands of white British and presumably non-Muslim sex offenders who make the news. How many of them are labelled "Christian sex attacker" or "Jewish pervert" etc? Why is the religious heritage of a sex offender only mentioned why the offenders are of Muslim background?
If mentioning religion for one particular demographic then surely its only fair to mention the religious heritage of them all?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Nothatgingerpirate · 19/01/2025 20:09

But the gang in question was a Muslim one, no?

Survivingnotthriving24 · 19/01/2025 20:09

Aryahpuff · 19/01/2025 19:59

To all the people saying almost all perpetrators are Pakistani or Muslim.

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/wrong-to-say-group-based-child-abuse-is-predominantly-committed-by-pakistani-men-police-chiefs-13286550

Got to love the blatant racism and Islamaphobia on here as per usual.

You've cherry picked information from this article:

"So, in this specific category, there is a disproportionate representation to the number of Pakistanis in the population."

Why it states in this specific category is poor reporting though, given both categories there is a disproportionate representation to the number of Pakistanis in the population (3.9% and 6.9% respectively versus 2.7% in the general population).

Edited (hit post by accident): So while it's not predominantly Pakistani men (although many still under investigation that may change the figures reported), there's a disproportionate number of Pakistani men committing these atrocities on a population level.

andIsaid · 19/01/2025 20:09

Olga009933 · 19/01/2025 20:01

Seems a lot of people have some very rigid, preconceived ideas of what a Muslim should look like. I remember not long after starting school in the UK, being met with gasps, stares, pointing and whispering from my peers when it became known I'm Muslim. I'd probably mentioned eid or something and they were like "but you don't Look Pakistani..". Had to explain till I was blue in face that Pakistan is just one of dozens of Muslim countries and that, yes, some Muslim countries have white population. It got tedious and tiring.

This seems so bloody arrogant to me.

You got jaded and exhausted by the fact that you were an unexpected insert into casual beliefs and people wanted to engage with you on it.

If it was sooo exhausting explaining to the Little Englanders then say nothing in the first place?

JayJayEl · 19/01/2025 20:10

turbonerd · 19/01/2025 19:51

Pakistan became a country for the Muslim Indians after ww2. The geographic areas of Pakistan and (now) Bangladesh were separated from the geographical area of the Indian State because of the inability of people from the two major religions to form a society.
India = predominantly hindu
Pakistan = predominantly muslim.

I understand that, but some posters are saying things like the word "Muslim" is acceptable but then talking about their "ethnicity".
And "predominantly" doesn't mean "all". I agree with other posters who have said this is more about the offenders' culture and ethnicity.

SomethingSScintillating · 19/01/2025 20:10

@whippy1981 I think you missed the point there. There are often either marriages within a family eg cousins or very close marriages and communities are tight knit.
Someone trying to report their own cousin or uncle whose also their whatever is harder than reporting someone with no or few ties.

Twiney2 · 19/01/2025 20:10

Wrong again

TENSsion · 19/01/2025 20:10

Hoppingabout · 19/01/2025 20:08

We are talking about Pakistani Muslim men not Chechen Muslim women. It's not about you. It's about what the victims have suffering at their hands.

This!

OP, instead of being mad at these men being correctly identified, why aren’t you just mad at them for committing the crimes?

Tittat50 · 19/01/2025 20:11

whippy1981 · 19/01/2025 19:51

That is not the case. All rapists are dangerous and ppl who support victims are threatened etc. Bob down the road will ensure his friends are part of the intimidation as white men do to their victims and supporters. Bob is just as dangerous and will ensure intimidation of such victims and their supporters hence why we have witness protection systems.

All rapists will do what they can to intimidate, harm and punish those who support victims. Bob is just as dangerous.

Yes I agree all rapists and sex offenders are dangerous. The danger to the victim posed by the rapist as an individual is not necessarily different in any case. In one scenario however, you'll potentially deal with the added pressure from Police and other services ( education, social services) to shut up and put up based on the perpetrator being of a particular ethnicity and religion. The added fall out is this that I'm referring to. This I believe is more likely in certain communication and not across the board in the UK.

And equally, I believe if you're a young black man in London, you're more likely to be stopped by the Police than a white peer . I can also believe you'd be given a harsher sentence because of this. I don't know how bad that outcome is here in the UK; in America certainly so.

All these things can be true.

Hoppingabout · 19/01/2025 20:11

Blarn · 19/01/2025 20:09

I think it makes the issue seem like it is restricted to Muslims or men from Pakistan. Although it is clear that a lot of these gangs were of Pakistani origin, it would be dangerous to think that there are not men from other cultures and from all over the world are involved in similar.

I also think we need to move on from grooming gangs. The girls were groomed, but then they were raped and suffered child sexual abuse. But these cases go back to when descriptions like child pornography and child prostitutes were still being used in the media.

You have missed the point of the entire thread and the entire issue. It's worth having a read again perhaps as to why this is different.

Twiney2 · 19/01/2025 20:11

Monsterstogo · 19/01/2025 19:58

We need to know the perpetrators were Muslim because we need to know why this happened and that there is eventual justice and to stop it happening again.

We should be focused on protecting the victims and not ‘covering up’ religion,or any form of establishment, to prevent justice. Look at the Postal Scandal, haemophilia victims etc.

We called out Catholic abuse and we have a right to the victims to call out the abuse that was perpetrated onto them by Muslim men.

Was it called Catholic abuse?

SomethingSScintillating · 19/01/2025 20:11

@JayJayEl raises this earlier because I did not know Muslims consider themselves to be born Muslim.

So that really confuses things. In the UK now at least you would say you are raised in a certain way not born.

downwiththatsortof · 19/01/2025 20:12

@Olga009933 denial of facts and reality a problem for you op? Do you follow a religion yourself?

SomethingSScintillating · 19/01/2025 20:12

Well catholic nuns, priests, schools, churches, boarding school?? Yes!

valentinka31 · 19/01/2025 20:13

I think it's the 'gang' issue. The sense of a group of men who clubbed together and had this plan, but operated under the guise of being 'good' guys, going to the mosque together, being family men. In Oxford we had a group of the very top respected elders and strong family guys of the mosque who had a whole racket going on where they took vulnerable girls from a local authority care home, for cash, and took them at night somewhere, they were 'used' by multiple guys, forced to have abortions, etc, then returned to the care home. And these girls were white, parentless girls aged from 13 or so. This was such a cynical operation, and part of its success depended upon respect for the ostensibly religious decency of the perpetrators. In this case, I think it was reasonable to mention their religion. If there were gangs of men of another religion who had this co-ordinated plan, then fair enough, mention that religion too.

For example, Catholic priests have been, rightly, outed for some of their homosexual abuse rackets.

TENSsion · 19/01/2025 20:13

Twiney2 · 19/01/2025 20:11

Was it called Catholic abuse?

Yes

Grooming gangs being labelled as "Muslim grooming gangs"
Hoppingabout · 19/01/2025 20:13

JayJayEl · 19/01/2025 20:10

I understand that, but some posters are saying things like the word "Muslim" is acceptable but then talking about their "ethnicity".
And "predominantly" doesn't mean "all". I agree with other posters who have said this is more about the offenders' culture and ethnicity.

Both the religion (Islam) and ethnicity (Pakistani) is relevant in why victims were selected, who the perpetrators were and why it was covered up.

Banyon · 19/01/2025 20:14

Twiney2 · 19/01/2025 20:11

Was it called Catholic abuse?

Did you miss 15 years of news & media headlines about Catholic Church priest sex abuse? Books, movies, documentaries, podcasts?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-44209971.amp

BBC says the word catholic many many times

Olga009933 · 19/01/2025 20:14

TENSsion · 19/01/2025 20:10

This!

OP, instead of being mad at these men being correctly identified, why aren’t you just mad at them for committing the crimes?

Please refer to my earlier comments. I'm just as sickened and disgusted by those gangs as anybody else on here. I'm simply adding that people have preconceived ideas of who Muslims are is unhelpful.

OP posts:
TENSsion · 19/01/2025 20:15

Olga009933 · 19/01/2025 20:14

Please refer to my earlier comments. I'm just as sickened and disgusted by those gangs as anybody else on here. I'm simply adding that people have preconceived ideas of who Muslims are is unhelpful.

Do you think women have as much freedom as men in Islamic cultures?

ToWhitToWhoo · 19/01/2025 20:15

Saschka · 19/01/2025 18:10

Based on your experience of the police, do you think it is more likely they ignored this because they were incredibly racially-aware and woke, or because they were lazy and/or bent?

I don’t see the police worrying about looking racist when they stop and search black teenage boys. They do have a long history of corruption and association with organised crime however (which this certainly was). Remember that the police called gang members to let them know when at least one of the victims tried to make a statement.

Of course it is much more convenient for them to say “oh sorry we were just too keen to avoid being racist” than it is to say “our senior officer was getting backhanders for us ignoring this”

Exactly,

Some police used 'community cohesion' as an excuse; but this doesn't mean that the gangs were allowed to get away with rape and abuse because of 'woke liberals' favouring Muslims. They got away with it because the police and criminal justice system are very weak with regard to rape and violence against females at the best of times, and were particularly so here, because many of the victims were not just working class, but from very poor backgrounds: in some cases in care. And 'care' too often means the complete opposite.

Hoppingabout · 19/01/2025 20:16

Twiney2 · 19/01/2025 20:11

Was it called Catholic abuse?

You probably need to read up on this. Of course it was called "Catholic" otherwise how would you have differentiated it from the child abuse that happens everywhere. This led to changes in practices in the Catholic Church and some schools run by monks, due to allegations of abuse.

HRTQueen · 19/01/2025 20:17

whippy1981 · 19/01/2025 19:45

White men? Nope they see all females as being lesser than they are and see that no one believes them so they will harm whoever they have the opportunity to.

They do not care who their victims are. They aim to hurt.

You think sex offenders (or white sex offenders) do not at times choose their victims and have a preference for a type of victim

Hoppingabout · 19/01/2025 20:17

ToWhitToWhoo · 19/01/2025 20:15

Exactly,

Some police used 'community cohesion' as an excuse; but this doesn't mean that the gangs were allowed to get away with rape and abuse because of 'woke liberals' favouring Muslims. They got away with it because the police and criminal justice system are very weak with regard to rape and violence against females at the best of times, and were particularly so here, because many of the victims were not just working class, but from very poor backgrounds: in some cases in care. And 'care' too often means the complete opposite.

This is presumably also true at the same time.

PerambulationFrustration · 19/01/2025 20:17

They may have been of Muslim origin but what they did was nothing to do with religion and most Muslims would be horrified by this.
They were mostly Pakistani men who in all likelihood were not religious.

JayJayEl · 19/01/2025 20:17

TENSsion · 19/01/2025 20:10

This!

OP, instead of being mad at these men being correctly identified, why aren’t you just mad at them for committing the crimes?

Because the consequences for the everyday, normal Muslims are insurmountable. Yet another stick to beat good people with.

And the poor, poor victims are being used as bait for all the Islamophobes in this country.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread