I will say that I know very few men who prefer shaved. The vast majority don't really care one way or another - vag is vag. But I know many more men who actually prefer pubic hair than vice versa. Though, again, I severely doubt any man who really does prefer bush would actively turn down a woman because she was shaved.
I also think it's different to shaved legs, armpits, whatever else. To me, that's exaggerating a sex characteristic. Women tend to have less hairy legs than men, so women shave them bald to exaggerate the difference, thus appearing more "feminine".
However, growing pubic hair is what happens when you go through puberty. Adult men and women tend to have equally hairy pubic areas - the area around it might be a little less hairy in woman eg upper thighs, lower stomach, etc. but the actual pubic area of a woman has hair that is just as dense, thick, and long as a man's. (I used to organise life drawing classes so I really feel like I've seen a great deal of bodies in my time 🤣)
So really there is nothing feminine about a bald pubic area, which to me makes it fundamentally different to the motivation/origin behind the practice of shaving legs.
Of course, I fully endorse a woman keeping their hair on any and all parts of their body. I just think the difference is clear.