This is NOT a woman!

[Wittow]

https://www.lancs.live/news/uk-world-news/dangerous-woman-jailed-violent-physical-30578498?int_source=taboola&int_medium=display&int_campaign=organic

When is enough gaslighting going to be enough???

Just laughing at the 3% of people who looked at that photo and have decided, yes, I've decided to see a woman, I am looking at a woman, I am a good person because I am now seeing a woman. Is this self radicalisation or self hypnosis?

Yes, I think that is the plan. I think it was Norway adopted self id and then there was a sudden explosion in violent and sex crimes by women.

Then people in authority point to the crime stats and say “well women are dangerous too” and use it to justify removing single sex spaces. I have literally heard this argument in a school by a head teacher.

It’s absolutely disgusting 🤬

There are quite a lot of activists on here.

They dgaf about harms to women.

That's not true.

I know many of us are very concerned about gender ideology and its effects, but we have to keep to the truth - particularly because gender ideologues don't.

The truth is that most mass shootings in the US are carried out by men and boys who are not transgender.

And the truth is that the perpetrator in the case in the OP is a man.

I know many of us are very concerned about gender ideology and its effects, but we have to keep to the truth - particularly because gender ideologues don't.

The truth is that most mass shootings in the US are carried out by men and boys who are not transgender.

Yes that is correct. What is happening though is that most of the rare high profile ones committed by female people have been by ones who identify as men (so called "trans men"). Obviously this is a small sample but it's a highly concerning pattern.

The sex of his victim is unknown.

Unfortunately IPSO is in the hands of trans activists (see recent action against The Spectator), so this sort of lying - that's what it is, blatant lying, legal representatives lying in court, judges lying, forcing victims to lie, and forcing the press to report on a lie - will continue.

Transphobes get a life challenge

Transphobes get a life challenge

Or people could stop pretending violent men are women?

Nice beard

It's all so so batshit now it's time to start investigating why.

We're past discussing whether it's absurd misogyny or not. Of course it is.

We all know no one thinks this is a woman. Not the bloke himself, not the policeman, not the journalist, not the judge.

So - why?

Some decent journalists, or a decent police investigator (if there are any) or lawyer need to start digging to ascertain if it's money or paedophiles at the top or what exactly is going on.

It stinks and when it all comes out in the wash, which it will, there should be a huge number of high up people who find themselves in prison.

An enquiry is long overdue, I agree. This is affecting so many areas of society, it needs intervention from the top.

Or maybe femphobes and misogynists could get a life and read that this is about a RAPE that is now counted as a womans crime. How do you think that's fair? @Flapjacka

IPSO only affects the press.

The guidance for the judicial system, the Equal Treatment Bench Book, says "It should be possible to work on the basis of a person’s chosen gender identity and their preferred name/pronouns, “he/she or they”, for most court and tribunal purposes, regardless of whether they have obtained legal recognition of their sex/gender by way of a GRC."

So the judge, lawyers and court officials refer to people like Angel Hill as "she".

Police describe transwomen as "women" and refer to them as "she" in appeals for information and press releases.

It's not just the media.

Aha! Lancs Live...the paper with a convicted drunk driver as their motoring correspondent!

Ah I see the activists are trying to wind us up.

Ignore. Don't give them the air.

Any data on the "most" there on mass shootings @Ereshkigalangcleg ? I would describe myself as GC but I would like to see the numbers. I can think of a few high profile shootings by transmen, but historically more by women (though they tend to have fewer victims than men and be less reported and stick less in folk memory).

If you go on tiktok and happen across some sick parent who's transed their kid, you'll find hundreds upon thousands of 'love love love this, love everyone, be yourself' type comments . There are so so many stupid people sheep in the world, which has been highlighted by the trans farce. 3% on here. And they all get a vote.

"When is enough gaslighting going to be enough???"

Very good question!

@HumanBurrito

There have only been about 5 or 6 mass shootings in the US by female people in the last few decades. It is incredibly rare. 3 have been by "trans" females.

The numbers are so small though that if as it appears this latest one has been carried out by a girl who doesn't have a transgender identity, my statement that it is "most" will have been rendered incorrect, even though until yesterday it was. That's the issue when we are talking about such small numbers. But it's worth remembering that trans rights activists also use small numbers to make claims that they are at "risk" - it isn't good practice then either.

The female people with a trans identity:

Audrey/Aiden Hale - Nashville school shooting
Alex McKinney - Denver school shooting
Snochia Moseley - Aberdeen Colorado Rite Aid shooting

I think it also depends how you define a "mass shooting" statistically. So maybe "most" wasn't the best term. But they are a significant proportion of female mass shootings and I think should be paid attention to.

If you want to be a woman, at least have a shave!

Right, yes. Assumably the judge wouldn't have said 'dangerous woman'