Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this is an unacceptable wage?

1000 replies

Youthiswastedontheyoung · 14/11/2024 09:41

I'm a qualified teacher with 21 years' experience who has just started supply so flexibility with a poorly husband and three kids of my own.
Just did a full day supply (8.30-3.30) and came out with £112 net.
Hubby thinks decent wage, I think piss-take!
Opinions please!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Christmasiscomingtown · 14/11/2024 11:45

Biffingtonclyro · 14/11/2024 11:23

But you're getting £16ph before tax she's getting it after tax.

I don’t get taxed. I work 2x 8 hours per week. So 8 shifts a month

Sheepchops · 14/11/2024 11:46

You’re right, it’s not acceptable. All the ones saying it is just goes to show how conditioned we have all become to undervalue our worth.

CautiousLurker1 · 14/11/2024 11:48

Had to think about this - a 6.5hour day (assuming you have half an hour’s lunch entitlement) is not a ‘full’ day. Most people work for the same wage over a 7-8hr day (ie until 530). Your take home pay on a 6.5 hr day is £17.69/hr, but doesn’t involve the marking, planning, or any responsibility etc.

The fact that you have 21 years experience is irrelevant. You’ve chosen to do supply because it offers more flexibility to meet family needs and doesn’t involve the out of hours commitments and obligations other permanent staff of the same experience are required to offer.

You can’t have it both ways - you either obtain a full time job with flexible arrangements that might fit around your children/husband in emergency situations, but will obviously require you to commit to the extra responsibility and workload that comes with this, or you accept that your degree and experience are irrelevant as you need flexible, family centric employment which comes at a reduced salary.

I appreciate you have family pressures which are guiding you, but you really cannot rail at a system that prioritises and financially benefits FT permanent staff. You may be better looking at alternative professions where your teaching experience and degree would support you and where, perhaps, you can have a hybrid/WFT set up that works better with your family.

CatJumpingApple · 14/11/2024 11:48

Youthiswastedontheyoung · 14/11/2024 10:00

Around £5 ph over minimum wage is decent? Really? For a qualified professional?

We are all qualified professionals, with degrees, and we earn less.

Flowerrrr · 14/11/2024 11:49

Sheepchops · 14/11/2024 11:46

You’re right, it’s not acceptable. All the ones saying it is just goes to show how conditioned we have all become to undervalue our worth.

Edited

I agree teachers pay is unfair, in context to reality and how things currently are though, this pay for a supply teacher seems fair.

NewFriendlyLadybird · 14/11/2024 11:49

Youthiswastedontheyoung · 14/11/2024 09:52

I don't think £16 ph is acceptable tbh. 4 years at uni, degree and PGCE, 21 years of teaching.

Whether it’s ‘acceptable’ (to you) is neither here nor there as you don’t actually have room to negotiate. And schools are not paying any teachers according to how they value them, but only according to how much they can afford.

coffeesaveslives · 14/11/2024 11:49

I don’t get taxed. I work 2x 8 hours per week. So 8 shifts a month

It's still your before tax pay though 🙈

Startinganew32 · 14/11/2024 11:50

Doggymummar · 14/11/2024 11:33

That's really poor, I just checked with my aunty and she did supply in the 80s and got £140 a day, I'm assuming pretax she was a head teacher pre kids tho if that makes a difference. She did two days a week around her kids and they had a very nice life. Her husband never worked after the miners strikes.

A supply head teacher? 140 a day in 1984 is over £600 a day today so I very much doubt it.

Startinganew32 · 14/11/2024 11:51

Christmasiscomingtown · 14/11/2024 11:45

I don’t get taxed. I work 2x 8 hours per week. So 8 shifts a month

You don’t pay tax??

coffeesaveslives · 14/11/2024 11:52

Sheepchops · 14/11/2024 11:46

You’re right, it’s not acceptable. All the ones saying it is just goes to show how conditioned we have all become to undervalue our worth.

Edited

What wage would be acceptable for a part- time locum role with no added responsibilities and the flexibility to have a day of week off whenever you need? Her experience isn't really relevant as she's not a permanent teacher.

OP currently earns about £20 an hour before tax. Doesn't sound too shabby to me 🤷‍♀️

Christmasiscomingtown · 14/11/2024 11:55

Startinganew32 · 14/11/2024 11:51

You don’t pay tax??

I don’t earn enough. I pay some NI.

Oblahdeeoblahdoe · 14/11/2024 11:58

I agree, supply agencies are taking a huge slice of money and the piss! Find an agency who will pay for
My DB drives a dumper truck around a building site and gets £180 a day.

Narwhalsh · 14/11/2024 11:58

For reference my DH works in civil service and is on a lower per hour for a permanent role, 4 years degree 18 years experience. State jobs don’t pay well but supposedly he will get a decent ish pension and he has very little stress/pressure in the role, switches off and can offer our family the flexibility we need. My job in a private sector pays much better but highly pressured. Our family wouldn’t be able to function with 2 jobs like mine.

snowmichael · 14/11/2024 12:02

Youthiswastedontheyoung · 14/11/2024 09:52

I don't think £16 ph is acceptable tbh. 4 years at uni, degree and PGCE, 21 years of teaching.

Then change jobs

Winter2020 · 14/11/2024 12:02

Lisanoonan · 14/11/2024 10:45

Sure why not try it as a side Job and see if you like it

Edited

The comparison’s that “My cleaner earns that” miss the mark for me. Being a “good cleaner” that the customer is happy with like “4 bed/2 bath house cleaned in a couple of hours - and she wipes the hob” type customer is hard physical work and the cleaner deserves every penny.

I agree anyone who thinks the grass is greener for cleaners should give it a go.

Thedailycookie · 14/11/2024 12:04

I agree, it’s not a reasonable wage for a teacher. I work as a nanny earning £25 NET an hour and that’s for 2 kids.

SockFluffInTheBath · 14/11/2024 12:05

so flexibility with a poorly husband and three kids of my own.

You've traded salary and responsibility for flexibility- as many mothers do at some point. I did. I also left teaching to go back to something better paid that’s aligned to my degree, is that an option for you?

rainingsnoring · 14/11/2024 12:06

coffeesaveslives · 14/11/2024 11:52

What wage would be acceptable for a part- time locum role with no added responsibilities and the flexibility to have a day of week off whenever you need? Her experience isn't really relevant as she's not a permanent teacher.

OP currently earns about £20 an hour before tax. Doesn't sound too shabby to me 🤷‍♀️

I'm not quite sure what your point is here.
Do you think that people working part time should be paid less for their time?
Do you think that contractors/ locums/ self employed people should be paid less for their time than employed people? The usual logic has been they that self employed contractor types should be paid more per hour because they have none of the security that an employed person has, hence the lower rate of NI.
I can see that point that she is not working in a senior management type role so her experience is probably less relevant, although I would argue that the quality of teaching varies a great deal.

ShinyShona · 14/11/2024 12:06

It's interesting watching so many people try and tell the OP she's getting a good wage because it is similar or better than what they are on. It's exactly what the richest people want us to do, fighting over the scraps.

The truth of it is that wages today are a lot lower than they were 20-30 years ago. Ordinary people can't afford to buy houses now not just because of supply issues but because we're not being paid enough whilst the wealthiest cream off higher profits, avoid their taxes and buy the houses that should be ours. The public sector follows the private sector's lead on flatlining wages so everyone is getting poorer.

The truth is hardly any of us are getting paid fairly today. The OP's wage is unacceptable. So is mine. And almost certainly so is yours.

rainingsnoring · 14/11/2024 12:07

Oblahdeeoblahdoe · 14/11/2024 11:58

I agree, supply agencies are taking a huge slice of money and the piss! Find an agency who will pay for
My DB drives a dumper truck around a building site and gets £180 a day.

Do you actually need to use an agency as a supply teacher? I can't see why they would add anything for the teacher here.

rainingsnoring · 14/11/2024 12:09

ShinyShona · 14/11/2024 12:06

It's interesting watching so many people try and tell the OP she's getting a good wage because it is similar or better than what they are on. It's exactly what the richest people want us to do, fighting over the scraps.

The truth of it is that wages today are a lot lower than they were 20-30 years ago. Ordinary people can't afford to buy houses now not just because of supply issues but because we're not being paid enough whilst the wealthiest cream off higher profits, avoid their taxes and buy the houses that should be ours. The public sector follows the private sector's lead on flatlining wages so everyone is getting poorer.

The truth is hardly any of us are getting paid fairly today. The OP's wage is unacceptable. So is mine. And almost certainly so is yours.

I totally agree with this. You always get this race to the bottom on these type of threads. I find it really depressing, as I said earlier.
Wages in the UK (for most people, not everyone) are rubbish and nowhere near enough compared to the cost of housing, childcare and other essentials. As you say, we shouldn't be fighting among ourselves as to who is harder done by.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 14/11/2024 12:10

Should be just over £223 gross with qualified status abd tvat experience

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 14/11/2024 12:12

Bobbybobbins · 14/11/2024 10:35

The thing is for supply you don't need the experience so the pay reflects this. That is the downside but upside is you get more flexibility, lack of planning and marking.

You've obviously ever worked in the sector. Tge vast majority expect all teachers to fulfill all duties.

ManchesterLu · 14/11/2024 12:14

Youthiswastedontheyoung · 14/11/2024 09:52

I don't think £16 ph is acceptable tbh. 4 years at uni, degree and PGCE, 21 years of teaching.

Well then go for a full time teaching position, with all the responsibility that comes with it, and you will get a better wage.

DreamyDreamy · 14/11/2024 12:16

Mnetcurious · 14/11/2024 10:27

Op is (wrongly) comparing her (net) hourly rate to minimum wage (gross).

This is what I was wondering. Amounts need to be quoted gross, as tax paid depends on various factors.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.