I have reflected on a cognitive dissonance I have with all of this which I have to separate. On the one hand revenge porn really pisses me off, in cases of ex boyfriends or whomever. It doesn’t raise my rage as much in this instance, because I have some sympathy for the daughter. Plus an empathy for her hurt and rage. Intellectually I know it’s illegal/harms the victim, so it SHOULD be adjudicated on that basis.
I guess there is something in me that has less sympathy in seeing people who wreck families when they face some sort of consequence for their actions. I rather suspect that if the “escort” photos had been cropped to imply nudity without actually showing it I’d probably think “fair enough, probably taking it a bit far and it’s still not especially healthy behaviour for the daughter to have done it, but I get how she feels”.
Would I have given her 3 years? Possibly not, and if I was sat on a Jury where that sort of reprimand was on the table I’d be tempted to nullify. On the other hand if you were to ask me is posting nude pictures of anyone publicly online ever justified? I’d answer unequivocally no, so what I SHOULD do as a juror is actually very clear indeed.