Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To hope that Donald Trump doesn’t win the election

1000 replies

RosaMoline · 21/10/2024 16:05

….it’s getting closer.
I was hoping that Kamala would be a shoo-in for the presidency, but looking at the betting odds, I’m feeling quite pessimistic.
It’s incomprehensible to me that a convicted felon, racist, rapist, liar and misogynist who spurred on an insurrection - after everything that’s happened - is running for office again and may very well win.
It’s comforting to read though that fellow Brits DON’T support him.
Apart from Reform. Obviously.
yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50752-who-did-britons-want-to-win-the-2024-us-presidential-election

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
saltinesandcoffeecups · 26/10/2024 02:04

Oh and I’ll add for fairness that the Republicans have also had many opportunities to codify anti abortion laws at a Federal level and haven’t… for the same reason. It’s an easy voting issue on their side and energizes their base.

MessinaBloom · 26/10/2024 02:08

Menopausalsourpuss · 25/10/2024 16:42

You haven't made any good points. As I have explained hundreds of women and children have been murdered by murderers (mostly violent men) who have been released after serving their sentences. So the lack of a death penalty caused their murders (far more than innocent people who were executed and that would be almost zero with dna). How can you support that? And that's before you realise that countries like Singapore have far lower murder rates because the death penalty acts as a deterrent. I am on the side of innocent women and children not violent men like you.

Have you heard of the term 'Sentenced for life without parole'?

This means certain types of heinous murderers are never released.

SinnerBoy · 26/10/2024 04:15

saltinesandcoffeecups · Today 01:59

Hm, so illegal in13 states and good luck if you go past 6 weeks in Iowa, Florida etc. And heaven help you if you travel out of state in some cases. Or have an ectopic pregnancy etc.

dontcryformeargentina · 26/10/2024 08:31

Feetroot · 22/10/2024 10:47

The contributions to this thread are really part of the problem. Playing into the polarisation between republican and democrat; smearing anyone who disagrees with you as a racist/misogynist; personal attacks on the candidates’ age or appearance.

In a democracy, some people will like people you don’t like. Therefore sometimes people you don’t like will be elected. It’s literally baked into the system and it’s a wonderful thing compared to the alternative, which is totalitarianism.

I do agree that there are issues with character and corruption in politics. Basically only sharks can win, because that is how the system is set up. But that is a reason for system reform not polarisation and personal attacks.

This...

whathaveiforgotten · 26/10/2024 08:40

@roaringmouse

I don't want for any woman to die because she can't get access to a legal abortion. But neither do I want an unborn baby to die because a woman needs an abortion.

In which case the question is which of those do you want least?

You need to prioritise either the woman (or girl, in some cases) or the foetus.

Which do you think the legal system should give more rights to?

whathaveiforgotten · 26/10/2024 08:42

@saltinesandcoffeecups

Trump is actually pro choice and has said he has no interest and will not sign any legislation banning abortion at at a federal level.

He said recently "there has to be some form of punishment" for women who have an abortion.

He said that out loud, on air, on the record.

And you believe he is pro choice?

awaynboilyurheid · 26/10/2024 09:26

Candaceowens · 21/10/2024 20:32

@MelainesLaugh Obama was one of the worst presidents in modern history. And since we're attacking people's character, his fake marriage with Michelle where they try and brand themselves as the new Kennedy's and his sleazy drug and sex parties are hardly admirable.

This is total rubbish! Honestly how low can you go … very low it would seem.
America could do with Obama again, the world respected an American leader who was highly intelligent, balanced, charismatic, statesmanlike, an actual adult, as opposed to a screaming orange toddler.

The very fact he would “ solve” the war in Ukraine by giving in to Putin is terrifying, who would be next?

Wallaw · 26/10/2024 09:29

awaynboilyurheid · 26/10/2024 09:26

This is total rubbish! Honestly how low can you go … very low it would seem.
America could do with Obama again, the world respected an American leader who was highly intelligent, balanced, charismatic, statesmanlike, an actual adult, as opposed to a screaming orange toddler.

The very fact he would “ solve” the war in Ukraine by giving in to Putin is terrifying, who would be next?

@awaynboilyurheid

Honestly, save you effort on this one. When a poster's this deep into suckling out of the arsehole of 4chan, they're either a troll or there's no point.

pointythings · 26/10/2024 09:46

roaringmouse · 26/10/2024 00:48

Legal (and illegal) abortion, with absolute certainty, also leads to the death of innocent people. We 'other' these innocent people by calling them foetuses, or a cluster of cells or whatever, but to many, they are innocent people.

All manner of innocent people die and are killed all the time. We nevertheless have to make painfully difficult choices about life and death, based on our values, be they cultural or religious. And societies have to do the same.

I don't want for any woman to die because she can't get access to a legal abortion. But neither do I want an unborn baby to die because a woman needs an abortion.

But you can't have it both ways. When it comes to abortion, you always have to choose between the life that is here now - a woman, one with people around her, one who quite possibly already has living children - and one that is not here yet. Allowing the living woman to die for a lack of safe legal abortion will have a devastating impact on more than just her.

If you want to reduce the number of abortions - and I do, despite being hardcore pro choice! - then you look at what is being done in countries where the abortion rate is very, very low. And it always comes back to things that religious people don't want to do: provide excellent sex education starting early, provide easy and free or very affordable contraception, make sure there is great provision of support for mothers, make sure childcare is accessible for all. Somehow the religious and the forcer birthers more widely never want to see these proven solutions put in place.

thepariscrimefiles · 26/10/2024 10:41

pointythings · 26/10/2024 09:46

But you can't have it both ways. When it comes to abortion, you always have to choose between the life that is here now - a woman, one with people around her, one who quite possibly already has living children - and one that is not here yet. Allowing the living woman to die for a lack of safe legal abortion will have a devastating impact on more than just her.

If you want to reduce the number of abortions - and I do, despite being hardcore pro choice! - then you look at what is being done in countries where the abortion rate is very, very low. And it always comes back to things that religious people don't want to do: provide excellent sex education starting early, provide easy and free or very affordable contraception, make sure there is great provision of support for mothers, make sure childcare is accessible for all. Somehow the religious and the forcer birthers more widely never want to see these proven solutions put in place.

Exactly! These forced birthers only care about the foetus/child while it is in the womb. As soon as it is born, they couldn't give a fuck. These are the people who want even more lenient gun laws and couldn't care less about all the children killed in school shootings. Their right to bear arms trumps (no pun intended) the safety and right to life of children attending school.

They support the death penalty and never forget that Trump called for the execution of the Central Park 5 who turned out to be innocent.

These are mostly people who say that they are Christians.

The mindsets and value systems of Trump supporters and Kamala supporters are so different that there can never be any common ground. Both sets of supporters see this as a battle of good versus evil, obviously with different opinions of which side is good and which side is evil.

mjf981 · 26/10/2024 10:54

I think Trump will win by a large margin.
The mainstream media is desperate to 'big up' Harris, but she just doesn't have what it takes. There is no X factor. This combined with the fact she is a black female and she is destined to fail.
I fear the next 4 years and what a Trump presidency will mean for the world.

izimbra · 26/10/2024 11:11

Menopausalsourpuss · 24/10/2024 23:17

You are a very rude person @izimbra , there is no need to abuse people if you're confident in your arguments is my advice. I am probably older than you so know those ideas have been around for a long time, but were held by academics and left wing politicians only, they are now mainstream in middle class wealthy circles and people who hold all the power although probably not by the majority and certainly not working class people.

Edited

@Menopausalsourpuss
I think the contempt you show towards transgenderism is worthy of rudeness.

And trying to frame a belief that institutional racism exists as 'elitist' is pretty grotesque.

izimbra · 26/10/2024 11:14

mjf981 · 26/10/2024 10:54

I think Trump will win by a large margin.
The mainstream media is desperate to 'big up' Harris, but she just doesn't have what it takes. There is no X factor. This combined with the fact she is a black female and she is destined to fail.
I fear the next 4 years and what a Trump presidency will mean for the world.

She 'has what it takes' to rise from an ordinary background to become VP - but she doesn't 'have what it takes to be President'? She clearly has brains, grit, drive, political nous. What else does she need? Look back over the last 10 presidents. What did they have that she doesn't have, other than a penis?

thepariscrimefiles · 26/10/2024 12:00

izimbra · 26/10/2024 11:14

She 'has what it takes' to rise from an ordinary background to become VP - but she doesn't 'have what it takes to be President'? She clearly has brains, grit, drive, political nous. What else does she need? Look back over the last 10 presidents. What did they have that she doesn't have, other than a penis?

Edited

CNN senior political commentator Van Jones says former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are being held to different standards in the 2024 presidential race:

"Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are not taking the same exam. He gets to get lawless. She has to be flawless."

BustingBaoBun · 26/10/2024 12:23

There appears to be NO standards as far as Trump.

He can insult and demean people, give them nicknames, swear, grift by selling bibles, sneakers and watches made in China, he can fat shame, he can lie again and again, he can insult the military by calling them suckers and losers, he can mock the disabled, he can admire the worst dictators like Putin and Kim Jong Un, cats and dogs, convicted felon, incited an insurrection
I''ve barely scratched the surface...

izimbra · 26/10/2024 12:38

thepariscrimefiles · 26/10/2024 12:00

CNN senior political commentator Van Jones says former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are being held to different standards in the 2024 presidential race:

"Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are not taking the same exam. He gets to get lawless. She has to be flawless."

Just saw a clip from Jake Tapper on social media where two senior Republicans (speaker Michael Johnson and Mitch McConnell) are filmed saying that Harris calling Trump a 'fascist' is wrong and that it might encourage another assassination attempt. In response the commentator played two clips of Trump calling Harris 'A communist, a socialist and a fascist'. 😂

thepariscrimefiles · 26/10/2024 12:52

izimbra · 26/10/2024 12:38

Just saw a clip from Jake Tapper on social media where two senior Republicans (speaker Michael Johnson and Mitch McConnell) are filmed saying that Harris calling Trump a 'fascist' is wrong and that it might encourage another assassination attempt. In response the commentator played two clips of Trump calling Harris 'A communist, a socialist and a fascist'. 😂

The scariest thing is that even the news outlets that don't openly support Donald Trump, in the US and the UK, report on him as though he is a normal candidate.

A couple of days ago, BBC Newsnight, showed a clip of Kamala Harris saying that she thought Trump was a fascist after she had been shown the footage of General John Kelly saying this and other things such as Trump wanting his generals to be like Hitler's generals. They then asked the guests in the studio for their opinions, and the Tory guest, former Education Minister Michelle Donelan, said that she didn't think it was an appropriate thing for Harris to say.

Newsnight did not show clips from that same day of Donald Trump calling Kamala Harris a 'low IQ individual'. The BBC like the US media holds Harris to an impossibly high standard while giving Trump a pass on his most disgusting and unprofessional behaviour. It's bizarre.

DuncinToffee · 26/10/2024 12:58

,

To hope that Donald Trump doesn’t win the election
biscuitandcake · 26/10/2024 13:08

I think comparing Trump to Hitler is like comparing Hitler to Napoleon or Julius Caesar. Different men, different times. An authoritarian state in the 21 century would look completely different to authoritarian states in the 20th century so worst case scenario's imagining America sliding into a German style fascism are misleading and miss the point. Besides, just because Hitler wanted to be like Caesar, it doesn't mean the rest of the world should have agreed. Many men have thought they were Caesar or Napoleon or Charlemagne. They weren't. I do think if a man keeps comparing himself to Hitler, or Caesar, or Napoleon he should be kept from power (and possibly receive appropriate compassionate care within an institution or the community).

biscuitandcake · 26/10/2024 13:10

If anything, the story of Julius Caesar should serve as a strong disincentive to those who might get whipped up by the media into thinking assassination is an appropriate political tool.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/10/2024 13:14

scatterolight · 25/10/2024 13:20

I saw this on Twitter and thought it was a brilliant summation of the problem with Harris where otherwise it's hard to put into words how bad a choice she is.

"Kamala Harris is so catastrophically bad at answering basic, predictable questions that people endorsing her have, I believe, been left without a plausible explanation for their support. If you vote for Harris, you are tacitly accepting some form of extra-constitutional rule in which we are not even entitled to know who is actually making “presidential” decisions on our behalf. Yes, that was already true under Biden, but if you trusted CNN, MSNBC and the NYT, maybe just maybe you didn’t know how out of touch President Biden was until the debate with Trump.

I’m open to the possibility I’ve failed to escape my own filter-bubble and have somehow missed a credible argument for Harris, but someone will need to make the case. I don’t want to hear about the horrors of Trump, or Biden administration miracles. I want to hear an argument for supporting Harris herself, specifically—one that is based on her capacity and not dependent on immutable characteristics.

If that case can’t be made, then at the very least, Democrats should be ready to burn their party to the ground for sticking them with such a weak candidate in an election that most on both sides believe to be profoundly important for the nation."

I don't think that's a particularly insightful post. Swap round Harris for Trump and it could be said by anyone.

The bit that did interest me me though was the last paragraph because I think that the Republican Party should burn themselves to the ground for chosing a repeat sex offender, a criminal and a known enemy of American democracy as their candidate.

I get why the Democrats picked Kamala, she is the Vice President, so it makes sense. I'm 🤯 that Republicans chose Trump.

WTF were they thinking?

Who posted it @scatterolight ?

Jumpingthruhoops · 26/10/2024 13:21

BustingBaoBun · 21/10/2024 16:40

I am scared for the US, and for the world if he should win.

There are quite a few Trump fans on MN actually, no idea why. The argument seems to be... he did 4 years before and the world didn't end.

He's older, his cognitive abilities are far worse, he is out for revenge, and that awful man JDVance is hanging around in the background with his Project 2025

I am scared for the US, and for the world if he should win.

A Trump win would be awful domestically and globally BUT...

The US has gone to ruin under the CURRENT administration... which Kamala Harris has been vice president of. Why would people elect her to do more of the same, ie, nothing!?

Surely if she's in a position to improve things, she'd be doing it already?

And for those who mentioned the popularity of Farage in the UK, Reform got votes because people wanted to see the back of the Tories but didn't want a Labour govt.
It seems their concerns were justified as Labour under Kier Starmer thus far has been an absolute disaster!

Wallaw · 26/10/2024 13:28

Jumpingthruhoops · 26/10/2024 13:21

I am scared for the US, and for the world if he should win.

A Trump win would be awful domestically and globally BUT...

The US has gone to ruin under the CURRENT administration... which Kamala Harris has been vice president of. Why would people elect her to do more of the same, ie, nothing!?

Surely if she's in a position to improve things, she'd be doing it already?

And for those who mentioned the popularity of Farage in the UK, Reform got votes because people wanted to see the back of the Tories but didn't want a Labour govt.
It seems their concerns were justified as Labour under Kier Starmer thus far has been an absolute disaster!

  1. The US has not gone to ruin under the current administration
  2. I'm not sure you understand the role of the vice president
BustingBaoBun · 26/10/2024 13:28

Totally disagree JumpingThruHoops but I'm sure that won't be a surprise to you.

I could show you a list of Biden Administration accomplishments but, to be honest, I can't see the point.

As for Starmer... come back to me in 14 years and tell me how awful it has all been.

izimbra · 26/10/2024 14:06

biscuitandcake · 26/10/2024 13:08

I think comparing Trump to Hitler is like comparing Hitler to Napoleon or Julius Caesar. Different men, different times. An authoritarian state in the 21 century would look completely different to authoritarian states in the 20th century so worst case scenario's imagining America sliding into a German style fascism are misleading and miss the point. Besides, just because Hitler wanted to be like Caesar, it doesn't mean the rest of the world should have agreed. Many men have thought they were Caesar or Napoleon or Charlemagne. They weren't. I do think if a man keeps comparing himself to Hitler, or Caesar, or Napoleon he should be kept from power (and possibly receive appropriate compassionate care within an institution or the community).

Odd post. I don't think any commentators are suggesting that under Trump America will 'slide into German style fascism'.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread