Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed our babysitter met up with a male friend while taking care of my two children?

252 replies

BMCoffee · 30/09/2024 12:45

22yo regular babysitter apparently met up with her male "best friend" at the park while taking care of my 1yo and 4yo. No permission, and she hasn't told us about it. My 4yo son went on and on about the babysitters friend, giving his name and loads of detail. I've never met this person.

I'm right that this is wrong from a safeguarding perspective, as well as cheeky af to be socialising on paid time, right?!

I told a friend and she didn't see the harm in it..

OP posts:
renoleno · 02/10/2024 00:15

Reugny · 01/10/2024 11:14

@renoleno The children are 1 and 4.

You are massively overreacting.

And you're massively under reacting. There's enough kids who go missing, kidnapped, assaulted, abused in the presence of adults they actually know - to make me question how naive adults can be in 2024. Let's tell kids to never talk to strangers, unless it's a random man your au pair had introduced you to without telling your mummy. Nurseries and schools have security to stop random people just walking in and talking to the kids, unless there's permission from parents - yet this au pair'/nanny's mates should be trusted implicitly with no need to learn anything more.....

wellington77 · 02/10/2024 00:18

Yep I agree with you. I would be angry. You’ve no idea who this guy is and if he’s dangerous or not. And she shouldn’t be socialising on the job.

Jack80 · 02/10/2024 10:39

It wouldn't bother me unless she was neglecting the children and it wasn't at your house.

Rosscameasdoody · 02/10/2024 10:44

wellington77 · 02/10/2024 00:18

Yep I agree with you. I would be angry. You’ve no idea who this guy is and if he’s dangerous or not. And she shouldn’t be socialising on the job.

She took the kids to the park. Someone she knew was there so she spoke to him and he interacted with the kids. What was she supposed to do, shun people she knew because she was with the kids ? It’s a non-event.

Rosscameasdoody · 02/10/2024 10:57

renoleno · 02/10/2024 00:15

And you're massively under reacting. There's enough kids who go missing, kidnapped, assaulted, abused in the presence of adults they actually know - to make me question how naive adults can be in 2024. Let's tell kids to never talk to strangers, unless it's a random man your au pair had introduced you to without telling your mummy. Nurseries and schools have security to stop random people just walking in and talking to the kids, unless there's permission from parents - yet this au pair'/nanny's mates should be trusted implicitly with no need to learn anything more.....

But she’s neither a nanny nor an au pair. She’s a babysitter and she took the kids to the park.

independencefreedom · 02/10/2024 11:15

OP, you still haven't outlined the circumstances of the encounter, ie whether it was pre-arranged or not and many posters have said that it makes a big difference as it's clearly impossible to control who your au pair might randomly meet if she's out in public with your children.

If you don't want your children spending time with people who are strangers to you, just tell your au pair that. Maybe you weren't clear about it before. You can go on being angry, or you can improve your communication with her about your expectations/guidelines. It's maybe a bit careless or cheeky if you haven't asked her not to do this.

BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 11:17

independencefreedom · 02/10/2024 11:15

OP, you still haven't outlined the circumstances of the encounter, ie whether it was pre-arranged or not and many posters have said that it makes a big difference as it's clearly impossible to control who your au pair might randomly meet if she's out in public with your children.

If you don't want your children spending time with people who are strangers to you, just tell your au pair that. Maybe you weren't clear about it before. You can go on being angry, or you can improve your communication with her about your expectations/guidelines. It's maybe a bit careless or cheeky if you haven't asked her not to do this.

I've since spoken to her and yes it was a prearranged meet up with her friend. She listened and understood that this isn't something I'm happy with her doing when she's with my kids. She can do that on her own time.

OP posts:
independencefreedom · 02/10/2024 11:30

BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 11:17

I've since spoken to her and yes it was a prearranged meet up with her friend. She listened and understood that this isn't something I'm happy with her doing when she's with my kids. She can do that on her own time.

ok well I hope it all goes smoothly now

TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 11:40

BMCoffee · 01/10/2024 02:43

Haven't read all the replies yet but just to be clear, she is an au pair who lives with us and we pay an hourly rate plus accommodation and board so we are not underpaying her. I wasn't sure how common au pairs are in the UK so I used the term babysitter, but could have said nanny, either way it is the person we have employed on a contract to care for our children. That contract doesn't allow for her to socialise with her mates while on paid time.

She met up with a young man with no kids at a playground, who now knows what they look like and their names, a complete stranger to me. It is not the same as meeting up with other nannies/ parents who have kids at the park. If she had have asked, I might have been able to ask some questions, but as it is we didn't get the opportunity to provide permission, and she hasn't mentioned it to me (I will raise it with her).

Au pairs are young women who are exploited for their labour. They are expected to do a lot of what a nanny does but for a fraction of the price. And of course you provide room and board! That’s what an au pair is, she couldn’t afford to live off of the pocket money that she gets. And that’s what it is, pocket money.

You get what you pay for.

BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 12:44

TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 11:40

Au pairs are young women who are exploited for their labour. They are expected to do a lot of what a nanny does but for a fraction of the price. And of course you provide room and board! That’s what an au pair is, she couldn’t afford to live off of the pocket money that she gets. And that’s what it is, pocket money.

You get what you pay for.

Edited

Exploited. Shes a fully grown woman who can decide to leave at any time she'd like. We have a contracted arrangement, shes signed up to that, and the board and accommodation etc saves her hundreds per month in living costs. All the money she gets goes towards fun or savings or whatever she likes, she pays no living costs whatsoever.

OP posts:
Blessedbunny · 02/10/2024 12:47

I’d be livid about that. But I see you’ve sorted it out now.

We once had that with our cat. I was not happy (the person brought unknown friends of hers to our house to look after the cat). Totally unacceptable. Never mind with a child.

Acornsoup · 02/10/2024 12:54

If this was my daughter I would advise her to find a new job. You seem to be looking for problems that aren't there.

Goodtogossip · 02/10/2024 14:27

QUOTE: It was a public space, but that's not the point! When with my kids, I decide what she does and who she sees, as I'm the parent. She is providing a service to us, she's not doing a favour.

WOW what an awful attitude you have towards this girl. You DON'T own her & for all she works for you you cannot decide what she does or who she sees when she's taking the kids out. If you trust her to care for your children then you should trust her choices & who she introduces to the kids whilst out & about. Looking after little ones can be lonely so meeting up with others is a good thing. As long as she's attentive to the kids & looks after them properly, who she meets shouldn't be an issue. Would you have an issue if she met up & socialised with other Nannies or Childminders with their children who she doesn't know that well?

motherofbabydragon · 02/10/2024 15:13

@BMCoffee a nanny which is what it sounds like you are after would be far more costly then an au pair trust me. don’t act like this is some charitable act on your behalf to provide her a room and food. Unlike a nanny in theory a au pair is treated as an older family member though i do know a lot of families take advantage and see it as a nanny on a shoe string budget. She might agree to your rules and respect them but in her shoes many would be looking for a new au pair position

NewName24 · 02/10/2024 15:30

Blessedbunny · 02/10/2024 12:47

I’d be livid about that. But I see you’ve sorted it out now.

We once had that with our cat. I was not happy (the person brought unknown friends of hers to our house to look after the cat). Totally unacceptable. Never mind with a child.

But that is completely different.

The OP's babysitter, or au pair didn't bring anyone in to the OP's house.
She chatted with them whilst taking the OP's dc to the park.
Totally different thing.

NewName24 · 02/10/2024 15:30

Acornsoup · 02/10/2024 12:54

If this was my daughter I would advise her to find a new job. You seem to be looking for problems that aren't there.

Same here.

Angrywife · 02/10/2024 17:46

YABU

But no doubt you'll keep arguing your point. Why did you post?

AutumnTimeForCosy24 · 02/10/2024 18:44

renoleno · 01/10/2024 08:42

why does this bloke want to spend time with two kids he doesn't know in the park?

In any other case, a lone man with no kids hanging around a playground would attract suspicion. So it's not at all likely they just bumped into each other as he'd have no reason to be there (or dubious ones if so). Not many women would be comfortable if a strange man came up to them to force a conversation, yet for their toddler it's absolutely fine just because their au pair knows them (no idea in what capacity as it wasn't discussed).

Can you imagine organising a date, and then taking someone else's 1 and 3 year old along? You can't supervise children if you're distracted, simple. They wander off, get snatched in seconds - if the child was lost/missing and the police realised the au pair was with her friend at the time, who she'd never mentioned to the mum, it wouldn't look good. Generally a good way to look at any job with the responsibility of children - have you created a situation where you may not be supervising the child as carefully as you should? If yes, then don't do it. Simple. Can't fathom anyone who thinks a parent would put the feelings and opinions of an au pair over their children's safety! Also these jobs hinge on references and word of mouth recommendations - it's a child for crying out loud, if they can't do the job without socialising with mates, it's not for them.

What a monumental
amout of tosh.

HazelPlayer · 02/10/2024 18:45

You seem to be looking for problems that aren't there

I wouldn't be happy that my child minder/nanny was arranging to meet friends, particularly male friends, while she's supposed to be caring for my kids.

As the op says, she can do that on her own time.

I don't think the op is being unreasonable at all, and many of the posts here have been ridiculous.

TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 19:21

HazelPlayer · 02/10/2024 18:45

You seem to be looking for problems that aren't there

I wouldn't be happy that my child minder/nanny was arranging to meet friends, particularly male friends, while she's supposed to be caring for my kids.

As the op says, she can do that on her own time.

I don't think the op is being unreasonable at all, and many of the posts here have been ridiculous.

You wouldn't be paying your childminder/nanny £75 a week.

You can't expect the same level of professionalism from a teen/young adult, she's not doing it maliciously.

BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 22:48

TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 19:21

You wouldn't be paying your childminder/nanny £75 a week.

You can't expect the same level of professionalism from a teen/young adult, she's not doing it maliciously.

I think au pairs must be paid terribly in the UK. Where we are she is being paid around £300 a week, and that is not full time. She is not paying the approx £250 living expenses she'd have to pay in rent and food for a similar set up, so that's a very approximate £550 a week in value.

OP posts:
BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 22:49

Angrywife · 02/10/2024 17:46

YABU

But no doubt you'll keep arguing your point. Why did you post?

I've been defending the accusations that we're exploiting someone or underpaying her, which isn't the aibu

OP posts:
TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 23:55

BMCoffee · 02/10/2024 22:48

I think au pairs must be paid terribly in the UK. Where we are she is being paid around £300 a week, and that is not full time. She is not paying the approx £250 living expenses she'd have to pay in rent and food for a similar set up, so that's a very approximate £550 a week in value.

What ‘similar set up’? She is an AU PAIR, if she was providing childcare for a family that she lived with and was expected to pay for the ‘privilege’, it would be illegal. The fact that you keep banging on it makes me think that you don’t get it and shouldn’t be employing au pairs.

And I can’t comment on how far her salary goes as I don’t know where you live. The au pair programme in the UK is designed to appeal to young people who want to learn English. They often take language classes while children are at school, are considered part of the family, and are given ‘pocket money’ in exchange for a maximum of 35 hours a week childcare. They are not considered qualified and experienced childcare givers.

OlderGlaswegianLivingInDevon · 03/10/2024 00:07

'I wasn't sure how common au pairs are in the UK so I used the term babysitter, but could have said nanny,'

wow ! the ignorance.

there have been au pairs in the UK for decades !!!

and there is a huge difference between an au pair and a nanny...

BMCoffee · 03/10/2024 03:34

TinkerTiger · 02/10/2024 23:55

What ‘similar set up’? She is an AU PAIR, if she was providing childcare for a family that she lived with and was expected to pay for the ‘privilege’, it would be illegal. The fact that you keep banging on it makes me think that you don’t get it and shouldn’t be employing au pairs.

And I can’t comment on how far her salary goes as I don’t know where you live. The au pair programme in the UK is designed to appeal to young people who want to learn English. They often take language classes while children are at school, are considered part of the family, and are given ‘pocket money’ in exchange for a maximum of 35 hours a week childcare. They are not considered qualified and experienced childcare givers.

Edited

The set up i was referring to was her living arrangement - separate living quarters board and utilities, the value of which if she were renting the space (or a similar one somewhere) is what I mentioned. Obviously not suggesting anyone would pay to look after my children.

I keep banging on about it because I can't believe people can't see the there is value in providing separate accommodation quarters, board and utilities (i.e. costs that people normally incur to live), on top of her pay. If she was a live out nanny, she would be paying those costs, and I would be paying a higher rate.

Au pairs may not be considered childcare workers to you, but we have one who is an experienced childcare worker, who is from abroad and found herself in a position to take up an au pair position. If she was a live out nanny, we'd be paying her £550 a week and she'd have to cover her own costs of living.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread