Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Having I fucked up the sex talk?

313 replies

TheSmartestGiantInTown1 · 23/09/2024 20:51

Today my 6 year old asked me how a man's seed gets into a woman's tummy (I have told him previously that babies are made from an egg and seed). His 4 year sister was listening at the time. My Mum was a HCP so very frank and no nonsense about anything body related, so I was always of the opinion it was best to answer questions honestly but without lots of unnecessary detail. I therefore explained that a man puts his penis inside a woman's vagina, the seed goes into a woman's womb, and meets the egg there. My daughter asked where the babies came out, I said the vagina. They looked mildly surprised and the conversation moved on.

I'd never discussed this with DH and he is horrified- I now see that we should have discussed our approach to this inevitable question long ago. He says I've stolen their innocence, and they'll never see the world the same way again. Honestly they didn't seem that bothered- there was a lot more questions when I had to explain a family member died. However now I feel horrible. Have I totally fucked this up? DH said I should have said that people have a special cuddle.

OP posts:
Baike · 25/09/2024 21:19

FrauPaige · 23/09/2024 23:28

It depends who the audience is. 6 year old boy - it doesn't matter much either way. Girl - different ballgame all together.

It also depends on why they are asking. For example, child at school with unfiltered internet access exposes boy to pornography - need to set them straight with the facts, yes. Girl - this may need a greater intervention as sexualisation at a young age does massive harm to girl's self-esteem, promiscuity, propensity for depression, eating disorders, etc.

Go with the facts - yes - but try to understand why they asked as you may need to go further

This. There are worrying stats around the % of children who have been exposed to porn in primary school. That needs addressing for that age group plus many of those have with younger siblings. Those younger siblings then start sharing ‘info’.

Let children hear factual, biological descriptions first before the internet or someone in their class ‘educates’ them.

Bouledeneige · 26/09/2024 07:50

I think that's fine. I think I told mine the same sort of thing at that age and they both forgot about it. It made no impression at all. No biggie.

Your DH is being silly and over dramatic. What would he have said?

FasterMichelin · 26/09/2024 14:53

CrouchingTigerHiddenChocolate · 25/09/2024 19:57

If your kid comes to you with questions and you keep putting it off then of course you won't be their first port of call for information. They will go to their friends who will answer their questions, with half truths and misinformation.

I have had conversations with my kids about drugs, porn, wars, murder, rape... literally anything they have asked me about.

If they are old enough to have the understanding to ask a question then they are old enough to know the answer in an age appropriate way. It's not fear they won't talk to me, it's about them knowing they can ask me anything and get a truthful answer with no judgement.

Why would being able to form the question mean they're ready to hear and process the response? They're two completely different things.

Since starting school, my child has come out with all sorts of questions and language that they wouldn't had they not been around children with older siblings. Being exposed to that, doesn't mean they're ready to know about it.

I think you're conflating them.

Age related boundaries are important to protect children emotionally. Just because they ask, does NOT mean they are truly ready to hear. Sometimes it's better to just not go there until they're mature enough to understand the issue properly.

CrouchingTigerHiddenChocolate · 26/09/2024 16:29

FasterMichelin · 26/09/2024 14:53

Why would being able to form the question mean they're ready to hear and process the response? They're two completely different things.

Since starting school, my child has come out with all sorts of questions and language that they wouldn't had they not been around children with older siblings. Being exposed to that, doesn't mean they're ready to know about it.

I think you're conflating them.

Age related boundaries are important to protect children emotionally. Just because they ask, does NOT mean they are truly ready to hear. Sometimes it's better to just not go there until they're mature enough to understand the issue properly.

If that's the style of parenting you're comfortable with then fair enough.

I have an open and honest relationship with my kids that has served me well for over 20 years. That includes putting my own discomfort aside to answer difficult questions at times.

Don't try and imply that I don't have age related boundries because I don't brush off questions from my kids. That would be very lazy parenting on my part if I did that.

Being exposed to things they don't understand means they either continue to not understand it , but join up the dots and come to their own conclusions, ask the people using that language what things mean and hear God knows what as an answer, or they ask their parent and either get an age appropriate answer that explains the basics, or they get brushed off and get their information elsewhere. You're fine with the latter, I'm not.

FasterMichelin · 27/09/2024 13:09

CrouchingTigerHiddenChocolate · 26/09/2024 16:29

If that's the style of parenting you're comfortable with then fair enough.

I have an open and honest relationship with my kids that has served me well for over 20 years. That includes putting my own discomfort aside to answer difficult questions at times.

Don't try and imply that I don't have age related boundries because I don't brush off questions from my kids. That would be very lazy parenting on my part if I did that.

Being exposed to things they don't understand means they either continue to not understand it , but join up the dots and come to their own conclusions, ask the people using that language what things mean and hear God knows what as an answer, or they ask their parent and either get an age appropriate answer that explains the basics, or they get brushed off and get their information elsewhere. You're fine with the latter, I'm not.

I'm not uncomfortable talking about sex. I am with a 4 & 6 year old though.

Toiletrollwaspreciousincovidtimes · 27/09/2024 13:31

He never saw them until the birth. Oral sex he physically shuddered when I mentioned it. We married when he was 47. All I wanted on honeymoon was oral sex. He refused and went to sleep. Luckily airline hadn't flagged up my new luggage items... Divorced and I remarried... He had a fling with my landlord.
Keith..
It explained a lot..

PUGMEISTER21 · 27/09/2024 22:55

Beth216 · 23/09/2024 20:55

No one gets pregnant from a cuddle. You did the right thing.

Mary did!

Grammarnut · 28/09/2024 12:46

PUGMEISTER21 · 27/09/2024 22:55

Mary did!

Technically, the Holy Spirit came over her and she conceived. No cuddles. 'Jerry Springer: The Opera' (very Biblically based) produced an ancient heresy/belief/gloss on the annunciation: that Mary was raped by God. It was on the BBC version but when I saw a live production it was omitted.

BlueSkies1981 · 28/09/2024 17:10

returningbrit · 25/09/2024 17:17

What wording were you thinking should be used? cck, dck, c*t, pssy ,fanny etc?... these are slang words not anatomically correct. People use these words during sexual talk because the medical words are exactly that ...medical and a bit sterile.

No but in the awful situation that a child is sexually abused them knowing the actual term for body parts is really important. I know it’s not something anyone wants to think about but having experience in this area professionally children using other terms means it’s really difficult for actual evidence to be gathered.

MusicMakesItAllBetter · 02/10/2024 11:13

Toiletrollwaspreciousincovidtimes · 23/09/2024 21:09

Sex in the dark under the covers only. Needless to say it was crap!!
Possibly made clear when we divorced and he had a fling with my new landlord..
Keith.

Whaaaaaaaat??????
Oppressed homosexual in a nutshell.
Blimey

MusicMakesItAllBetter · 02/10/2024 11:15

Grammarnut · 28/09/2024 12:46

Technically, the Holy Spirit came over her and she conceived. No cuddles. 'Jerry Springer: The Opera' (very Biblically based) produced an ancient heresy/belief/gloss on the annunciation: that Mary was raped by God. It was on the BBC version but when I saw a live production it was omitted.

God only knew/knows love. He could never have raped anyone because he wasn’t a person to commit acts like that.
Man created evil and co to he’s making evil people by the power of mind and power and money.

EdgeOfSixty · 02/10/2024 13:13

Toiletrollwaspreciousincovidtimes · 23/09/2024 21:09

Sex in the dark under the covers only. Needless to say it was crap!!
Possibly made clear when we divorced and he had a fling with my new landlord..
Keith.

My grandparents born in 1895 and 1891 never saw each other naked, apparently. All getting changed or sex happened in the dark or under the blankets. I'm sure they weren't unusual at the time. Granny had at least 5 pregnancies.

Grammarnut · 02/10/2024 15:02

MusicMakesItAllBetter · 02/10/2024 11:15

God only knew/knows love. He could never have raped anyone because he wasn’t a person to commit acts like that.
Man created evil and co to he’s making evil people by the power of mind and power and money.

I did say it was a heresy.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page