Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Fiancé has agreed to be a Guarantor - I’m not happy

360 replies

workworkbloodywork · 15/09/2024 19:02

Not sure if I’m being highly unreasonable or fully entitled to be majorly fucked off with him.

His sister has asked him to be a guarantor on a rental that they want to upsize to as the partner has recently gone self employed.

he initially asked if I would be too but I was overseas at the time as I asked for us to discuss it when I was home.

he then said that we weren’t needed as they found someone. That then fell through and so they asked if just DF would do it. Again said let’s discuss when I’m home.

ive found out today that they have a moving date and have been packing. Turns out DF has agreed to do it without any communication to me.

so YABU - it’s family, you should think twice and just sign to dotted line asap

or YANBU - as an engaged couple, decisions that affect your family unit should be discussed at length before concluding on a decision together.

OP posts:
olympicsrock · 15/09/2024 22:53

Huge red flags for him as a potential husband.
He puts his family before you,
He lies by omission to you
He does not involve you in financial decisions ie does not see you as his equal partner.

Don’t marry him at the moment and tell him why. He would have to work hard to undo these.

soupfiend · 15/09/2024 22:53

HeySummerWhereAreYou · 15/09/2024 22:36

I agree. I think don't think many people realise they are allowed to say no though.

My friend was in a very tricky situation about 8 or 9 years ago, after her DH lost his well paid job 3-4 years before - and she was in ill health. Her daughter asked her to be a guarantor for a house that her and 3 other girls were moving into (when at Uni.) My friend said no. Basically because she couldn't. Her and her DH's finances were a bit shaky, they had debt that they were dealing with, and she and her DH had almost zero surplus income.

Her daughter begged her, and she said 'no, I can't ... I couldn't if I wanted to - me and your dad have no surplus income to pay if anything goes wrong. And we have nearly sorted our debt problem, and our credit rating is on the up, so we don't want to wreck it again.'

The landlady let her DD into the house with the other 3 with no guarantor amazingly. And then she went on to default on the rent, after spending all her money on parties and fancy clothes and tattoos, and ended up £1800 in debt within 3 months. She was in tears on the phone to my friend begging her to help with the rent.

But my friend had literally got like £25 spare at any one time in the bank. so she couldn't help. She says if she had gone on to be the guarantor she would have ended up with a demand to pay nearly £2000 - when she didn't even have £200 surplus income a year. As the months went on she could have ended up owing even more...

Big mistake to agree to be your DC's guarantor unless you really have got a lot of surplus income. I'm talking probably mid five figures per month to spare.

This is the sort of example I use too

But it can be worse, each guarantor, if the house is rented via joint tenancy, is liable for the rent of the house, any one of those girls could also default and each guarantor needs to pay up, it doesnt matter if it wasnt your daughter, she is a joint tenant and therefore jointly liable for the rent, if the other 3 girls cant cover it, or theres a gap getting someone new in, guess who pays up

Awful awful situation and parents need to be saying no.

rainbowunicorn · 15/09/2024 22:54

diddl · 15/09/2024 20:53

If there's no risk of them defaulting/there's ample money to cover it if they do-fine imo.

If not might you be risking the roof over your head to keep the one over theirs?

I would say someone that is newly self employed is probably the highest risk there is of defaulting. Most new businesses don't make it past the first year and the ones that do probably don't break even until year 2 at least.

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 22:58

skyfalldown · 15/09/2024 21:39

I'd move out before that ever happened

Moving out makes no difference. You (or your guarantor) are on the hook for the rent for the entirety of the tenancy agreement unless your LL agrees to terminate your tenancy early.

rainbowunicorn · 15/09/2024 23:02

Derwent01 · 15/09/2024 21:13

but then would you not just use the wifes name on the mortage etc ?

And end up not being able to get the amount they need for the mortgage as it is only on 1 income rather than joint?

Derwent01 · 15/09/2024 23:05

rainbowunicorn · 15/09/2024 23:02

And end up not being able to get the amount they need for the mortgage as it is only on 1 income rather than joint?

true,

rainbowunicorn · 15/09/2024 23:10

skyfalldown · 15/09/2024 21:35

I don't think I even asked when I put my mum down as a guarantor, it was just a box I needed to tick to ensure I could live somewhere in this market. I'd never expect her to pay a penny.

So, who would pay the rent then if your circumstances change and you can't?

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:12

Icanttakethisanymore · 15/09/2024 21:41

That’s odd. I rented out a flat recently and someone wanted to fix it for 24 months and the estate agent told me it’s not legally enforceable beyond 12 months.

The estate agent was talking nonsense - of course you can have a fixed-term tenancy agreement beyond 12 months if that's what you and the tenant want (a quick look at the NRLA website would have told you this). I would have challenged the EA and asked them what they meant by a longer AST not being "legally enforceable".

skyfalldown · 15/09/2024 23:23

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 22:51

Your mum would not have been your guarantor unless she signed an agreement to be so. You cannot make someone your guarantor without their knowledge and agreement (unless you did so fraudulently and forged her signature on the guarantor agreement).

Can't be binding then because all I did was pop her name down and nothing was ever signed - it was a formality

skyfalldown · 15/09/2024 23:25

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 22:58

Moving out makes no difference. You (or your guarantor) are on the hook for the rent for the entirety of the tenancy agreement unless your LL agrees to terminate your tenancy early.

We don't have set terms - I now realise guarantors must have a different role than they do here

ABirdsEyeView · 15/09/2024 23:28

"you sound very controlling OP,"

It's not controlling to expect major financial decisions to be agreed. Not when a couple are supposed to be getting married and therefore what one person does, affects the other.

OP I would be rethinking the engagement - it's not a good sign at all that he's done this without your consent. And his sister and bil sound dumb AF, going self employed and getting a bigger house. If they need a guarantor then they can't afford this new place - many landlords would waive the guarantor requires if paid 6 months rent up front. If his sister can't afford that, she's no business upscaling!

I was guarantor once for DS at uni - never again. I was stressed until that lease ended and it was only one year. Letting agents roll lie through their teeth trying to make out it's no big deal but it is a huge fucking deal.

Your fiancé is either stupid or blasé and neither bodes well.

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:31

Coachvikki · 15/09/2024 21:47

For me it wouldn't really matter if I was guarantor or not, if my brother needed help with his rent I would just help him. So I don't see why the signed forms make any difference. What would you do, just see them kicked out?

Really? You don't see the difference between an informal "I'll help you out where I can" and a legally-binding guarantor agreement that has you on the hook for the entire rent payments every single month for the remainder of the tenancy agreement if your brother can't pay? Let's say your brother's rent is £1k pm and he loses his job in the second month of a 12-month AST with no break clause and he can't find another job. Do you have £10k surplus to pay his rent? And if not, do you understand the LL will take court action against you and anything you own is at risk? Now, do you really think that acting as a guarantor is the same as "just helping him"?

ABirdsEyeView · 15/09/2024 23:33

OP does he have any legal claim on your house - is he on the deeds?

HoppityBun · 15/09/2024 23:35

ABirdsEyeView · 15/09/2024 23:33

OP does he have any legal claim on your house - is he on the deeds?

This was my first thought

soupfiend · 15/09/2024 23:42

Its very unsual for someone to be on the deeds but not on the mortgage. Mortgage companies dont like it

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:44

Stickystickysticky · 15/09/2024 21:59

My daughter's boyfriend needed a guarantor when they rented (my dd was fine and had good credit) , he asked me and I said no. After much persuasion his mother agreed ( she obviously knew what he was like) and after 3 months he disappeared leaving my daughter. His mother was livid and asked if I could help financially, I again said no. It's all very good being a guarantor when everything is going well, but if it goes tits up it can all turn very unpleasant.

Absolutely THIS all day long!
(And frankly, he had a ruddy cheek asking you to be his guarantor before asking his own mother!)

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:48

KievLoverTwo · 15/09/2024 22:17

>We do live together in a property that I have a mortgage on.

So how has he done this? As far as I am aware, you have to be a home owner to be a guarantor and they take it very seriously. They even asked for my sister’s car reg when she did it for me some 20 odd years ago.

If he has signed the papers saying he owns the house with you, he is committing fraud, surely?

I am sorry, but there is no way I would take a risk for someone else’s sister. You are the one taking the risk of losing your home.

Professional guarantor services are available. Tell him to retract it and suggest she uses one of those.

You don't have to be a homeowner to be a guarantor, although some LL/Letting Agents will insist on this.

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:55

Rosscameasdoody · 15/09/2024 22:26

Depends on whether he has an interest in the property. He may not be paying the mortgage but could be on the deeds.

Fair point, but I'd like to think the OP would have mentioned if the property only she has a mortgage on was in joint names (and if so, if it's owned as joint tenants or tenants-in-common, because if it's the latter, her half of the value wouldn't be at risk).

AngelicKaty · 16/09/2024 00:03

DreamTheMoors · 15/09/2024 22:44

I co-signed (same thing) for some friends for some new furniture once.
They had a brand new infant and nothing to sit on.
Everything was fine until I got a letter in the mail telling me that “you haven’t paid your monthly payment in three months…”
I called them and told them I was taking over the payments and coming to get the furniture.
I didn’t want the furniture, but no fucking way was I paying to furnish somebody else’s home.
Lesson learned.

And do you know what I find most disgusting about your experience? THEY knew they hadn't paid for three months, but they didn't even have the decency to tell you, much less offer you an apology and an explanation.

KievLoverTwo · 16/09/2024 00:18

AngelicKaty · 15/09/2024 23:48

You don't have to be a homeowner to be a guarantor, although some LL/Letting Agents will insist on this.

TIL. I wonder how that works - being a guarantor if you have no assets to seize. Puzzling.

Livingtothefull · 16/09/2024 00:24

Saracen · 15/09/2024 22:13

the fact he has supported family members financially frequently in the past both equally made me adore how supportive he is of those around him but also concerned for our financial security in the future

That's the crux of it, isn't it? His generosity and loyalty are very attractive traits. At the same time, if he is too generous then your future could be jeopardised.

It's a difficult one.

I would argue that making major financial decisions which could directly impact the OP and the future they should be building, just so he can portray himself as generous to his family, is not an attractive trait. As his DF she should be his first priority. I would be really put off by this and think the OP is right to be angry.

I have got through my adult life, including times of real hardship, without ever expecting let alone asking family members to bail me out; nor have they ever expected this from me. I think that generally, adults are responsible for managing their own financial affairs and not expect to be supported by others (with the possible exception of unforeseen calamities - which this isn't).

So I don't think that it is actually difficult.

AngelicKaty · 16/09/2024 00:42

KievLoverTwo · 16/09/2024 00:18

TIL. I wonder how that works - being a guarantor if you have no assets to seize. Puzzling.

A home isn't the only asset and most people own some things of value e.g. a car, jewellery, electronic goods, etc. Anything that can be sold at auction to recoup some money for the LL can be listed on a controlled goods order by the enforcement agent to persuade the guarantor to enter into a payment agreement.

ReadingSoManyThreads · 16/09/2024 00:50

HeySummerWhereAreYou · 15/09/2024 22:17

Well this is it you see. Annoyingly, many parents of University students get asked to be guarantor for their (young adult) children, by the letting agents (that their children are getting their house from, for years 2 and 3 of university.

The parents are often jointly and severally liable for any rent their DC doesn't pay/can't pay, and can be expected to pay rent for any of the other 3 or 4 students too - if they don't pay! And also, any expenses for damage to the property.

It is grossly unfair and wrong to expect parents of University students to sign to be a guarantor, as so many things can go wrong, and they can end up being chased for 1000s and 1000s of pounds.

In terms of parent guarantors for students - I agree with you. The terms are outrageous.

Gingernaut · 16/09/2024 01:06

gardenmusic · 15/09/2024 19:29

This is entirely the wrong time to be a guarantor - when someone has given up the security of an employed role to be self employed. Most self employed businesses fail.
If you have joint finances with your fiance, I would be dismantling them. He wants to take the risk, then the risk is his, not yours. His family do not drag you under.
If he gets caught out and needs to pay for them, he takes an extra job, so that you are not suffering because of his unwise decision, you are not covering him, while he covers them.
Never guarantor unless you can afford to lose the money.

This

If your brother in law has just gone self employed, then unless he's been cultivating clients before that move, money is going to be very erratic

LifeExperience · 16/09/2024 03:32

I would seriously question the commitment and priorities of a man who has just shown you that he will put the desires of his family to "upsize" before you, your desires, and your future financial security. This is an ENORMOUS red flag.

He has also done a supremely stupid thing. If his sister and partner could afford the rent, they wouldn't need a guarantor. IOW, they want to live in a place they can't really afford and your fiance has put himself on the hook to pay the entire length of the lease if they can't. If he doesn't pay the landlord can sue him and he would have no defense. Landlord could also attach property to pay off the lease, including property jointly owned by the two of you once you're married. If dsis and co. pay late the landlord can ruin df's credit. He also becomes liable for any late charges, penalties etc. allowed by the contract.

NEVER become a guarantor unless you have lots and lots of money to throw around, because odds are you will need it. I have only been a guarantor for each of my children's first apartment lease, and only because I have plenty of money and could pay the leases off immediately if there were a problem.

This fiasco would be an absolute deal breaker for me. For one, I would not marry a financial fool, which he is, and second, I wouldn't marry a man who would disregard my feelings so flagrantly. He's not a keeper, OP.