every time we say it’s always men we minimise and dismiss the suffering of anybody who has been on the receiving end of abuse by a woman whether that’s neglect, domestic violence, assault all the way up to the more extreme and newsworthy cases
Every time we say its not just men we minimise and dismiss the suffering of anyone who has been on the receiving end of abuse by a man whether that's neglect, domestic violence, assault, all the way up to the more extreme and newsworthy cases.
No of course not. My point is it is not ALWAYS MEN and people may think that’s just a boring technicality and it’s fine to say it’s always men, but this is both factually incorrect, offensive, divisive, and unnecessary
But in this case, it was a man, it was in fact 70 men. Why is minimising this by saying its not just women helping?
What is factually incorrect about saying its always men, given that 98%of violent crimes are carried out by men?
Why is it factually incorrect to say that male violence is increasing, both male on female violence and male on male violence.
What needs to happen for you to stop excusing men's abhorrent behavior?