Yes Yes Yes I know about violence at home thank you very much, already adressed that.
I disagree, if a curfew for women after Everard is called for, and a virtual curfew for women enacted during the Yorkshire ripper, then yes dammit I too call for a curfew on men.
Sick of the reasonable doormat approach, that you never hear from men.
I'm sorry if I missed your suggestions regarding DV. I'm skimming through this thread. So perhaps I'm being unfair as I haven't seen all your posts, but the one I'm quoting comes across as appallingly dismissive of DV. As if those women (who make up a large proportion of VAWG victims) don't matter as much as victims of stranger violence.
Again I apologise if I'm missing something you've said previously but it implies a sort of victim blaming attitude towards victims of DV. I don't see how being concerned for all victims of VAWG (and actually male victims too) is a "doormat approach"?
The high profile cases you mention made the news precisely because they're less common than domestic homicide. It's worth remembering that 3 women a week are killed by someone they know, usually a partner or ex partner - and usually when it's domestic homicide it happens in the home.
A curfew like the one suggested by OP is not only unhelpful, unfair on innocent men, and divisive (so would cause resentment) but it would also increase the risk of violence for DV victims.
Knee jerk gimmicks aren't what we need. We need helpful, effective and holistic actions. I've posted about what would help in my previous posts.