My first response was to someone who said there were no white grooming gangs, I gave them a list of white grooming gangs.
That obviously offended some on here and they wanted stats on the proportion of offenders by ethnicity vs the ethnicity % of the UK, presumably show that Asian men were over-represented. I gave them the stats.
But the fact those stats actually showed that white brits were over-represented obviously offends you, and so we're moving the goal posts once again to two tier policing.
So tell me, was it two tier police when Canadian authorities handed over a list of hundreds of suspected british paedophile to the NCA, who then promptly ignored it?
Was it two-tier policing when they ignored several warnings about Ian Watkins over four years, or turned a blinde eye to the Westminster paedophile dossier, or dismissed the accusations against Saville, John Allen, the Anglican Church, Tam Paton and so on.
Why was there no protests about any of the above when it came to light? Why don't we see people highlighting these cases as examples of police turning a blind eye to white paedophilia?
I'm not defending anything here. The police's reluctance to investigate sexual abuse accusations is well documented, and a stain on their profession, but it's not specifically race related.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Abuse itself said it found evidence of gang-based abuse across the six cities it investiaged that hadn't had a high profile abuse case in the media. It also found widespread failures by the police to record the ethnicity of perpetrators which "makes it impossible to know whether any particular ethnic group is over-represented as perpetrators of child sexual exploitation by networks," but that won't stop those on the right pointing to Rotherham and Rochadale and using those abhorrent cases as a justification to hate all Muslims. People who do that are either racist or ignorant of the truth (often both I would guess).