Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to say women don't have XY chromosomes?

1000 replies

taylorswift1989 · 03/08/2024 11:55

Seeing a lot of posts on social media with people admitting they were "wrong" to call Imane Khelif a man, and that they now understand "she's a woman with XY chromosomes."

Am I going insane? A person with XY chromosomes is male! (Regardless of how they identify, of course.) Why are people saying stuff that is obviously nonsensical? Are people really that ignorant of basic biological facts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
GargoylesofBeelzebub · 03/08/2024 15:22

The WBO and the IBA have confirmed that testing done at the court of arbitration for sport have ruled that these two boxers are ineligible to participate in female boxing.

It disgraceful that the IOC are allowing males to punch females.

Why does make feelings always override female safety?

Tandora · 03/08/2024 15:23

AIstolemylunch · 03/08/2024 15:18

Chromosome testing looks at the number and type of chromosomes in your cells, similar to sex testing you can have when pregnant they look under a microscope and see if you have the normal number, any extras eg trisomy like in Down's syndrome and whether your sex chromosomes (pair 23) are 2 the same i.e 2 X chromosomes XX genotype (= female developmental pathway will be expressed) or 2 different ones, a long X chromosome and a short Y chromosome XY genotype (= male developmental pathway will be expressed).

Genetic testing is used interchangeably but really means doing a much nore complex analysis of mutations, and their effects, in the genes on various chromosome i.e small parts of the DNA on individual chromosomes that can be have coding differences from the norm = a genetic mutations.

DSD Disorders of Sexual Development can arise from chromosomal abnormalities eg an extra chromosome eg XXY (still phenotypically male) or as a result of downstream genetic mutations which cause different effects eg under virilization of the secondary sex characteristics in the foetus eg XY males with 5ARD - mutation on the gene (not on the sex chromosomes, on another chromosome entirely) that produces DHT - a precursor to testostetone that is responsible for the virulization of secondary sex characteristics in the foetus i.e forming a little penis. This function is taken over by the testes and actual testosterone at puberty, in this condition, so these boy babies, who could well have been mistaken as girl babies in places where they dont do proper chromosomal or genetic testing when babies with ambiguous genitalia are born, undergo normal male puberty and develop pretty much as normal men from that point.

Distessing for the individual but should not be in normal XX female sports because they have been tbrough male puberty and have the potential strength, cardiac, muscle advantage of men. Whether they're not great boxers , naturally short and small, dont train enough or whatever and lots of women can beat them is irrelevant. They are genetic and phenotypical (eventually) males.

Remeber that what it looks like between your legs is only the end resukt of a conplex biological pathway and is only really of secondary importance (hence why they're called 'secondary sex characteristics') what determines yoyr sex is your primary sex characteristics - testes or ovaries and capabale of producing sperm or eggs. Its one or the other. There is no human on the planet, ever, no DSD condition, no identiftying as that has resulted in a human, or indeed mammal, that can produce both sperm and eggs. Sex is binary I am afriad and hence there are 2 sex categories for sports.

This was all in GCSE Biology people.

If these 2 boxers are claming to have the extremely rare DSD CAIS complete androgen insensitivity syndrome where they are XY but have a downstream mutation in testosterone receptors such that they are completely insensitive to testosterone for their entire lifecycles, then let them state that in public with medical evidence and i am sure no one would have a problem with them competing in womans sports, as they are functionally female and crucially do not go throughmale puberty. Its very unlikely though that such individuals with the medical issues that go with that condition would make it into elite sports and they would not look like normal men, like they do.

Sex is binary I am afriad

Question- Do you consider women with CAIS male or female? What about women with Swyer ?

Runningupthecurtains · 03/08/2024 15:25

Even if we were to concede that sex isn't binary and there is M, F and other why should the other be put into the F category rather than the M category?

AIstolemylunch · 03/08/2024 15:25

Everydayimhuffling · 03/08/2024 15:03

@KielderWater because FROM OBSERVATION the label of female was put on her birth certificate. How exactly do you think that happened? That's how sex is usually assigned/determined at birth.

This is bullshit. Sex is onserved at birth but it is determined at comception. Hence why I was able to determine that I was carrying boys at 11 or 12 weeks of pregnancy as I had foetal cells extracted and chromosomal analysis done that showed they had XY pair 23 sex chromosomes and not XX.

Lo and behold they popped out as babies with little willies and tiny testicles and turned into hulking great men from age 11 that could physically pin me down from about the same age, which was no surprise!

Skinthin · 03/08/2024 15:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Fourfurrymonsters · 03/08/2024 15:25

StressedAndDepressed1 · 03/08/2024 14:50

If any of you understood what you were on about, then fair.

She's lost 9 matches - surely if she were male, she would have won them all? Carini has admitted she overreacted and wishes to apologise.

Meanwhile, a poor woman is being caught up in all of this, because she doesn't look womanly enough for some people.

Why would you immediately jump to the conclusion that an elite female boxer couldn’t possibly beat a male?? Is that what you’re basing your nonsense on? How fkg insulting to female athletes.

CaveMum · 03/08/2024 15:25

littlbrowndog · 03/08/2024 15:21

Why are the IOC against cheek swabs and why did they drop it ?

Drug testing is pretty undignified. You have to take enough of your clothes off so the tester can see urine coming from body to vessel

They dropped it after Atlanta, despite 82% of female athletes being in favour of it. My initial assumption is that they dropped it due to cost but this has allowed the loophole to be exploited. Ironically they could have easily saved themselves time and effort by simply telling the individual sports governing bodies that they need to carry out the tests at some point prior to Olympic qualification.

As I said upthread, the common sense approach would be to do it as soon as an athlete registers with a governing body - so for most this would probably be in their teens. That way it happens discreetly away from the public gaze and people can have faith that they are watching a fair competition by the time they reach elite levels.

AIstolemylunch · 03/08/2024 15:26

She was punched in the face by a man with male genetics who had gone through male puberty.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 03/08/2024 15:26

@Skinthin the WBO, IBA and CAS say that they are ineligible to compete in female sports. They are not a "cis" (sic) woman.

WickedSerious · 03/08/2024 15:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Nope,she was punched in the face by a bloke.

Helleofabore · 03/08/2024 15:27

littlbrowndog · 03/08/2024 15:21

Why are the IOC against cheek swabs and why did they drop it ?

Drug testing is pretty undignified. You have to take enough of your clothes off so the tester can see urine coming from body to vessel

Here you go lilbrowndog

ww.nature.com/articles/gim2000258.pdf?origin=ppub&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=CONR_PF018_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100045542&CJEVENT=f4d4c8630a0411ed831b01a80a1c0e11

This paper discusses it. It is from the group who used the information to convince the IOC to drop the tests. They used human rights as a major argument. It was all emotional reasoning. And it always amazed me that not one of them even thought about the impact on female people.

From the article "At the time of testing, all female athletes at the Atlanta Games were offered a questionnaire written in both English and French asking whether in their view testing of females should be continued in future Olympics and whether or not they were made anxious by the testing procedure.18Of the 928 athletes who responded, 82% felt that testing should be continued and 94% indicated that they were not made anxious by the procedure. Forty-six athletes were made "anxious" by the testing requirements that preceded their competitive events. No males were found to masquerade as females, and all females who were found to be SRY positive competed. While a similar proportion of females failed the test as in previous Olympics (Table 2), it is noteworthy that on this occasion no false positive tests were found and no athlete was barred from competition.'

So, 82% of the women answered that they felt sex testing should continue when surveyed at the 1996 Olympics. This was ignored.

Female people simply did not figure in the IOC decision to drop sex testing. Not their safety. Not their need for fairness.

http://www.nature.com/articles/gim2000258.pdf?origin=ppub&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=CONR_PF018_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100045542&CJEVENT=f4d4c8630a0411ed831b01a80a1c0e11

Relaxd · 03/08/2024 15:27

I feel that those stating it’s only about the chromosone would be saying the opposite if the Olympian had XX chromosomes and male sex organs such as testes, never mind if down the road their own kid finds out one day that they are unexpectedly intersex, for example during fertility issues. It feels pragmatic that those with female sex organs will generally be raised female - but can appreciate the challenges this has raised for elite sport - it would be good to see a consistent and clear approach on intersex competitors.

SpidersAreShitheads · 03/08/2024 15:28

AIstolemylunch · 03/08/2024 15:18

Chromosome testing looks at the number and type of chromosomes in your cells, similar to sex testing you can have when pregnant they look under a microscope and see if you have the normal number, any extras eg trisomy like in Down's syndrome and whether your sex chromosomes (pair 23) are 2 the same i.e 2 X chromosomes XX genotype (= female developmental pathway will be expressed) or 2 different ones, a long X chromosome and a short Y chromosome XY genotype (= male developmental pathway will be expressed).

Genetic testing is used interchangeably but really means doing a much nore complex analysis of mutations, and their effects, in the genes on various chromosome i.e small parts of the DNA on individual chromosomes that can be have coding differences from the norm = a genetic mutations.

DSD Disorders of Sexual Development can arise from chromosomal abnormalities eg an extra chromosome eg XXY (still phenotypically male) or as a result of downstream genetic mutations which cause different effects eg under virilization of the secondary sex characteristics in the foetus eg XY males with 5ARD - mutation on the gene (not on the sex chromosomes, on another chromosome entirely) that produces DHT - a precursor to testostetone that is responsible for the virulization of secondary sex characteristics in the foetus i.e forming a little penis. This function is taken over by the testes and actual testosterone at puberty, in this condition, so these boy babies, who could well have been mistaken as girl babies in places where they dont do proper chromosomal or genetic testing when babies with ambiguous genitalia are born, undergo normal male puberty and develop pretty much as normal men from that point.

Distessing for the individual but should not be in normal XX female sports because they have been tbrough male puberty and have the potential strength, cardiac, muscle advantage of men. Whether they're not great boxers , naturally short and small, dont train enough or whatever and lots of women can beat them is irrelevant. They are genetic and phenotypical (eventually) males.

Remeber that what it looks like between your legs is only the end resukt of a conplex biological pathway and is only really of secondary importance (hence why they're called 'secondary sex characteristics') what determines yoyr sex is your primary sex characteristics - testes or ovaries and capabale of producing sperm or eggs. Its one or the other. There is no human on the planet, ever, no DSD condition, no identiftying as that has resulted in a human, or indeed mammal, that can produce both sperm and eggs. Sex is binary I am afriad and hence there are 2 sex categories for sports.

This was all in GCSE Biology people.

If these 2 boxers are claming to have the extremely rare DSD CAIS complete androgen insensitivity syndrome where they are XY but have a downstream mutation in testosterone receptors such that they are completely insensitive to testosterone for their entire lifecycles, then let them state that in public with medical evidence and i am sure no one would have a problem with them competing in womans sports, as they are functionally female and crucially do not go throughmale puberty. Its very unlikely though that such individuals with the medical issues that go with that condition would make it into elite sports and they would not look like normal men, like they do.

This is a brilliant and factual walk through of the elements that are important 👏👏

littlbrowndog · 03/08/2024 15:28

I do think they have to move to cheek swabs

this is destroying our faith and enjoyment in womens sport and also in various sporting bodies including IOC.

i love womens sport but now I find myself questioning am I actually watching women or men

this is where the IOC in these Olympics has taken us to

KielderWater · 03/08/2024 15:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What evidence do you have that Khelif is a believer in gender ideology? If not why are you referring to him with language reflecting that belief system?

ChishiyaBat · 03/08/2024 15:29

Skinthin · 03/08/2024 15:15

I’m glad she apologised. Her behaviour was appalling

Edited

Are you fucking joking? Her behaviour was just fine, she was cheated out of a fair fight and smacked in the head by a man! I wish she hadn't apologised, I don't believe she wanted to either, more likely forced into it, but that's just my opinion.

OvaHere · 03/08/2024 15:30

Tandora · 03/08/2024 15:23

Sex is binary I am afriad

Question- Do you consider women with CAIS male or female? What about women with Swyer ?

Edited

They are male. That's the reality, however for all intents and purposes the world will superficially see them as women because they are androgen insensitive.

Whether this gives them a sporting advantage is a conversation that needs to be had truthfully and the starting point for that is admitting they are genetically male.

However it's disingenuous for you to keep bringing up people with CAIS in order to misdirect because whatever DSD the two male boxers in question have it is not CAIS because clearly they are NOT androgen insensitive.

Tandora · 03/08/2024 15:30

Helleofabore · 03/08/2024 15:22

There are now studies that show that male people 5ARD do have the potential to compete fairly with male athletes and to win. Their hormone production does not impede their performance as some people in the past have tried to theorise.

You, personally, can find this debate insulting and degrading because you rely on emotional reasoning. You have been the poster to label others having rational discussions about this as 'sex fascists'. I guess you might be the expert in insulting behaviour. You have certainly excelled in hyperbole in the past.

Oh yes silly emotional woman am I, with my inability to be rational, and my tendency to hyperbole .

im not sure why you keep repeating the “sex fascist” comments? I stand by them: an accurate descriptor of many of the views expressed on this thread.

Crystalball84 · 03/08/2024 15:30

She is a woman. The previous tests were not published and were carried out by a now proven corrupt organization.
She has a natural advantage. Are we going to start disqualifyng freakishly tall people from basketball or petite people from gymnastics. Michael Phelps has longer arms than 99.9% of the population, do we ban him?

She was beaten by women in previous fights.
Trans phones want it every way- you need a vagina to be a woman, now suddenly that's not enough.

Angrymum22 · 03/08/2024 15:30

Tandora · 03/08/2024 15:19

Have you read the thread? Yes XY is the usual male pattern chromosome , but possessing the usual male pattern chromosome does not always make a person male.

But it does in the biological definition. The number of DSD that are born every year do not significantly alter the norm. They are a rare expression of the normal male genetic form due entirely to genetic abnormality.
Most genetic abnormalities are not compatible with life. These acknowledged faults like other types of genetic faults are those that are compatible with life.
Like all gene disorders they are the result of mutation. The majority of DSDs render the individual infertile so that they are not inherited by subsequent generations.

SpidersAreShitheads · 03/08/2024 15:31

Helleofabore · 03/08/2024 15:27

Here you go lilbrowndog

ww.nature.com/articles/gim2000258.pdf?origin=ppub&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=commission_junction&utm_campaign=CONR_PF018_ECOM_GL_PHSS_ALWYS_DEEPLINK&utm_content=textlink&utm_term=PID100045542&CJEVENT=f4d4c8630a0411ed831b01a80a1c0e11

This paper discusses it. It is from the group who used the information to convince the IOC to drop the tests. They used human rights as a major argument. It was all emotional reasoning. And it always amazed me that not one of them even thought about the impact on female people.

From the article "At the time of testing, all female athletes at the Atlanta Games were offered a questionnaire written in both English and French asking whether in their view testing of females should be continued in future Olympics and whether or not they were made anxious by the testing procedure.18Of the 928 athletes who responded, 82% felt that testing should be continued and 94% indicated that they were not made anxious by the procedure. Forty-six athletes were made "anxious" by the testing requirements that preceded their competitive events. No males were found to masquerade as females, and all females who were found to be SRY positive competed. While a similar proportion of females failed the test as in previous Olympics (Table 2), it is noteworthy that on this occasion no false positive tests were found and no athlete was barred from competition.'

So, 82% of the women answered that they felt sex testing should continue when surveyed at the 1996 Olympics. This was ignored.

Female people simply did not figure in the IOC decision to drop sex testing. Not their safety. Not their need for fairness.

Women’s opinions and voices being ignored??!
Oooh what a shock. Not.

We simply don’t matter, do we?

littlbrowndog · 03/08/2024 15:32

Thanks Hellabore

WickedSerious · 03/08/2024 15:32

Crystalball84 · 03/08/2024 15:30

She is a woman. The previous tests were not published and were carried out by a now proven corrupt organization.
She has a natural advantage. Are we going to start disqualifyng freakishly tall people from basketball or petite people from gymnastics. Michael Phelps has longer arms than 99.9% of the population, do we ban him?

She was beaten by women in previous fights.
Trans phones want it every way- you need a vagina to be a woman, now suddenly that's not enough.

He was beaten by women in previous fights????????

Hold the front page.

nietzscheanvibe · 03/08/2024 15:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please don't cis-gender people, I find it offensive. 😆

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 03/08/2024 15:33

Crystalball84 · 03/08/2024 15:30

She is a woman. The previous tests were not published and were carried out by a now proven corrupt organization.
She has a natural advantage. Are we going to start disqualifyng freakishly tall people from basketball or petite people from gymnastics. Michael Phelps has longer arms than 99.9% of the population, do we ban him?

She was beaten by women in previous fights.
Trans phones want it every way- you need a vagina to be a woman, now suddenly that's not enough.

The tests were carried out by the court of sport arbitration not the IBA

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread