An assortment of responses:
@Happyhoppy15 Far bigger things to worry about your children seeing such as the huge riots we had recently in Leeds?
Does the phrase "false equivalence" mean anything to you? No? Ok, let's try a different way: Why are you moaning bout a few. rioters. in Leeds when there's homeless people in Luton? Why are you so bothered about the UK when the entire middle east is permanently at war? What about the inhuman suffering the dinosaurs went through? The diplodocuses had it worse than you, so what's the harm in your kids watching some extreme goat-on-goat por.... hmm.
Did you spot the problem yet?
@scottishheather86 Have you ever been to France?
Quite a few times actually, over the years, business and pleasure. Fags are cheaper, the brazieries sell grown-up lager rather than the pish water sold in the UK for the last 10 years, but only in thimble sized glasses. Fishing for Well's catfish, pike, and perch is good in some private chateau lakes. Some of the older people in Bénouville are the kindest people you'll ever meet, and the very best speakers.
What's your question got to do with exposing young children to pornography though.. is that something you do regularly perhaps?
@Willmafrockfit i would say it was nothing! its french, what do you expect
See also:
It's not important, he's a foreign! They get get their heads caved in all the time, what did you expect?
I don't give two hoots, they're ethnics! Of course it was them who stole your purse, what do you expect from them?
You're not important and you don't matter! Fcuk your siht and what you think, I'm [insert group/class/category/whatever pigeonhole here] so I can say whatever I like without fear of repercussion or consequence!
@Peaceandquietandacuppa The library scene was weird but it was obviously inspired by the movie “Jules and Jim” and the nouvelle vague (really famous French era of movie making in the 50s)
Oh piss off Methuselah. If your idea of justification for sexualising children is based on one single black and white "moving picture" that middle aged people's parents are too young to remember, then it's not really a valid point, is it?
@MessinaBloom OP seems to be quite annoyed about what she saw as an ingrained agenda in the Opening Ceremony. This implies she saw traces of it throughout, so she could have simply turned it off. I know I do that if a programme irritates me enough.
So let's have this right.. What you're saying is that a "hypothetical person" can make a tv program to be broadcast to every country on Earth that serves as an intro to a global event which several billion people will watch live, and just show whatever they like in it? You'll stand and fight for "person's" right to show live, uncensored, unregulated acts of zoophilia, coprophilia, torture, human vivisection, rang gape, chilled prawnography, shit that Serbian... did when they encountered humans for the first time at Srebrenica, "forced" this that and the other... You wholeheartedly support a "hypothetical person's right" to put that in front of families and children all across the world and justify it with a simple "pshh, aint my problem bruv, you let em watch it, that's on you" quip.
That's correct, isn't it?