And that's absolutely what was right for you.
But my annoyance on this threat is at the hypocrisy.
What is the difference between all of the other ways that we consume and use animals, and fur? No one seems to be able to succinctly answer that.
You avoid the bacon roll analogy, because it defeats your basis.
No one has thrown shade at leather shoes (and by the way, quality leather is NOT from beef cattle), or haribos, or marshmallows, because these types of products are detached from the poor cows they derived from, and are marketed to appear to the consumer as benign.
It's such typically western ethos to be highly ethically selective and go for saving the cute fluffy animal. Which in this case, has been dead for half a century.
I'd much rather someone wore vintage fur than shopped at fast fashion outlets (slave labour), purchased synthetic, chemical materials with plastic embedded in them, which then leach into our environments as micro plastics, which end up in our bodies and children.