Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you let an annoying family member live with you for 300k?

525 replies

L4815 · 11/07/2024 17:40

A relative of ours has said they will give us 300k if we allow them to move in with us.

It's me, DH and DS.

Pros.

Our 135k mortgage would be paid off plus other outstanding debt. We'd have a nice safety cushion and a better life financially.

Despite being annoying, deep down, we love family member and one of us feels a sense of duty toward them.

Family member would contribute to household chores.

Cons.

Family member is incredibly annoying. They like to be in control of everything. We don't let them but its still irritating.

Family member is a just about functioning alcoholic and would require our assistance with reducing.

Despite having some health issues, they are only in their 50s so potentially could end up living with us for another 20 years.

Family member would nag us about keeping the house clean. Much higher standards than us.

House is only a bog standard terrace so although we have a spare room, we only have one bathroom, one living area, etc.

One of us says absolutely no way, not even for a million. Other one sort of agrees but id also slightly swayed by how beneficial money would be and also feels sorry for family member who lives alone and has no other family or friends.

Almost feels a bit like selling your soul to the devil for money.

Ultimately feels like a choice between freedom or money.

WWYD?

Hypothetical really as one of us has already vetoed.

OP posts:
Greatmate · 11/07/2024 19:41

Absolutely not. If DH wants to live with his mum he can move out and do that.

MyBirthdayMonth · 11/07/2024 19:43

No. There isn't enough money in all the developed economies of the world to make that proposition appealing.

Surgarblossom · 11/07/2024 19:46

No way!

TowerRavenSeven · 11/07/2024 19:49

Maybe 3M. 1M to build completely separate dwelling; 1M for us & 1M for carers. Because the people I know are going to live forever!

Fantosia · 11/07/2024 19:50

No way.

tara66 · 11/07/2024 19:50

terrible idea for all concerned -No.

ShinyAppleDreamingOfTheSea · 11/07/2024 19:52

@L4815

Am trying to convince relative to move closer so we can be on hand to help and also downsize so they can free up some cash to live on as an alternative.

That would seem to be a fair alternative. But even so you would need to ensure that professional support services become involved and that you are clear on boundaries as otherwise this could still take over your life .

rainbowbee · 11/07/2024 19:52

Money is tempting but calm nice life is worth more. No.
Reminded of friend who did similar (they moved into MIL house and sold their own). MIL was far from a picnic even though the house was big. Mental rules. Now MIL is so old they can't in good conscience move on.

PKNI · 11/07/2024 19:54

andHelenknowsimmiserablenow · 11/07/2024 19:10

Couldn't you use the 300k to buy a house with an annex? That way your relative could live as tidy as she liked, have a drink and help with childcare if they wanted.
And you have your own space and your house how you want it.

I don't think you can have had any dealings/personal knowledge of people with alcoholism. There's no way they could ever be trusted to do any form of childcare! Sadly , they're simply unable to be reliable enough to risk the safety of a child. And the annex could become a real health hazard - lack of cleaning, incontinence, potential fire risks from smoking, cooking, candles etc.

IamnotwhouthinkIam · 11/07/2024 19:56

Imo living in a multi generational household has lots of benefits - such as yes, avoiding loneliness, household bill savings and housework and childcare help - BUT it only works if people have plenty of space, with their own bedrooms and more than one bathroom and living area so you can get away from each other sometimes!

It sounds like you might have the bedrooms but not the bathrooms and living space so it would be a no go for me, despite the money. The alcoholism is another complication on top of everything else- would he/she even be safe to be around your child?

MasterBeth · 11/07/2024 19:57

20 years? Could be 50 years!

Anonymouseposter · 11/07/2024 19:59

Family member is a just about functioning alcoholic and would require our assistance with reducing.
Are they actually motivated to reduce their drinking? If not, there will be nothing that you can do to help and it will be a nightmare.
Are they in work?
I wouldn't do this, even for a lot of money.

Lighteningstrikes · 11/07/2024 20:00

Absolutely no way.

As tempting as £300k is, you will regret it pretty much immediately. There is always a very high price to pay with people like this, so do not be fooled.

It NEVER works and then you could well be in a worse situation.

My DF, DH and their DS have been ruined/made very ill by her bastard father and they have to sell up and because of him they will lose well over £150k on top of everything.

BeardofHagrid · 11/07/2024 20:01

Annoying - maybe.
Alcoholic - hard nope!

andHelenknowsimmiserablenow · 11/07/2024 20:04

PKNI · 11/07/2024 19:54

I don't think you can have had any dealings/personal knowledge of people with alcoholism. There's no way they could ever be trusted to do any form of childcare! Sadly , they're simply unable to be reliable enough to risk the safety of a child. And the annex could become a real health hazard - lack of cleaning, incontinence, potential fire risks from smoking, cooking, candles etc.

Oh I lived a big part of my life with those dealings and personal knowledge unfortunately 😕
OP says they are houseproud and would help with the chores so they can't be that useless, but agree they couldn't be left alone with the kids unattended.

Flipzandchipz · 11/07/2024 20:06

Absolutely not. What about looking for some assisted living flats for over 50’s? They could sell up and rent which should be cheaper. There would be company and potential for help if needed in the future. Perhaps a GP referral and a referral to social services for support?

PadstowGirl · 11/07/2024 20:06

Is this even legal? I thought there were rules about how much you can gift someone.

stonecoldsober · 11/07/2024 20:07

It's a no from me.

If there was an annexe or separate part of the house, then maybe. But not if you'd be sharing living space, kitchen, bathroom etc.

Could you and DS really relax with family member around all the time?

EmeraldRoulette · 11/07/2024 20:08

PadstowGirl · 11/07/2024 20:06

Is this even legal? I thought there were rules about how much you can gift someone.

I think those are about tax

in principle, if I wanted to sell my flat and give the money to my sister, no law stops me doing that.

Duckswaddle · 11/07/2024 20:10

Absolutely no way.

PigletJohn · 11/07/2024 20:11

I don't believe you can help an alcoholic. Maybe some people think you can.

They will just drag you down.

foothandmouth · 11/07/2024 20:14

Absolutely hard no

And they won't cut down on the booze. They will just hide it better (or think they are but you will know).

This will ruin your home and your marriage

DanielGault · 11/07/2024 20:14

PigletJohn · 11/07/2024 20:11

I don't believe you can help an alcoholic. Maybe some people think you can.

They will just drag you down.

You can support a recovering alcoholic. But you have to have very strong boundaries yourself if you're doing that.

Happyher · 11/07/2024 20:14

Would you rather be rich or happy?

NCGrandParent · 11/07/2024 20:16

No
No
No
No
No
DO NOT DO THIS
It's not a viable option AT ALL.
Think through all the things that could change for you and your immediate family over the next 30 years...
10k a year is nowhere near enough to put up with someone else's shit...

Swipe left for the next trending thread