Im not sure what your point is here. Because there has been bigotry in the past, women should just accept men into their spaces, despite the clear safeguarding risks? Is that it?
My point is that when I see a style of rhetoric that reminds me of past demonisation and bigotry, I tend to question what's really behind it.
I'll accept there is potentially a safeguarding risk. What I don't know is just how significant and imminent a risk that really is, and how much it's being inflated by those whose motives are more driven by bigotry and/or stoking political divisions for personal gain than anything else. Is every transwoman a predator just itching for the chance to assault someone in a woman's-only space? Or is it only one in a million? Or is it somewhere in between? I don't know and I'm not sure anyone actually knows.
I appreciate that as I'm a bloke I don't have as much skin in this game which is why over the last few years I've spent way more time listening than speaking on this topic. I'm happy to accept that my evaluation of those risks is not going to be the same as a woman's and so my opinion about transwomen's entry into women's-only spaces is not as important.
But at the same time the trans people I've met and know seem a million miles away from the ugly stereotypes that are bandied about. Just like the anti-gay stereotypes I saw in the 80s didn't match up with the gay people I knew.