Some of you seem very slow to grasp what’s happening here. You keep saying things like
“ Surely your Dd has told teachers / social workers etc ? If she does , then of course they will believe her. “
The child HAS told people. But they don’t see that as proof that the father is an abuser . They see that as proof that the MOTHER is abusive, because she has planted these false ideas in her child’s head.
And they have LOTS of proof that they are lies
- there is no physical injury to child as observed by a social worker . But of course if the mother takes the child to hospital , that in itself will be abuse / manipulating the child / wasting NHS time / Münchausen’s syndrome by proxy .
- the father said it didn’t happen and he is much more plausible because he is male, rich and charming. And of course he’s not anxious , scared and angry like the mother, which proves he’s right.
- the child says she doesn’t want to get daddy into trouble . Which is the smart thing to say because she knows she will be left alone with him to face his anger.
- the child says that she still wants to see daddy. Because of course she loves him - most children love their abusive parent.
On top of this, they have lots of proof that the father is a Good Parent and the mother is a Bad Parent.
- The father is willing for the child to see the mother but not the other way around.
- The father tells the social workers / the system how great they are and how much he appreciates what they are doing for him. The mother is scared and suspicious of them and thinks that they are incompetent and dangerous.
This last one is the worst crime that any parent can commit with social services. They need a VAST amount of appreciation and love. There is a great deal of evidence from enquiries that SS leave children in horrendously abusive situations because they have decided that the parent / s “ Love their children “ and are “ trying their best “ and “ making progress “ - all based in the fact that they are nice to SW and evoke their sympathy. Meanwhile the child is literally starving to death in a cot in the next room.
So the absolute cast iron proof that the OP is guilty is that she is scared, angry, doesn’t trust the system and wants to keep her child away from her ex.
Those of you who are just regular parents reading this thread in horror think that a good parent tries to protect their child. But that’s because you haven’t had the benefit of the “ expert “ training of your average area social worker 🙄 and their few weeks of lectures on child protection.
IME that’s also why the police don’t agree with much SW practice and there is a lot of conflict - because the police know that
sometimes criminals lie and are manipulative
its much more likely that someone is lying about being a perpetrator than someone else is lying about being a victim
being rich and charming doesn’t mean you are innocent
being angry and terrified doesn’t mean you are guilty
that middle class men white men are just as abusive as working class black men, they just are often more clever about it and they are more likely to be believed
men who abusive and control their partners also do it to their children because it’s NOT a relationship issue, it’s because they are abusers
the smart abusers know how to do it in ways that don’t leave visible marks
women and children are often scared of bad men at the same time as loving them
7 years olds are children and often don’t know what’s best for them