Since there are obviously people who have not read the entire thread, I'll recap:
There are two completely different "Health Insurance" models - the "American" commercial model and the European "Health Fund" model.
The American model is the model that most people quite rightly are very afraid of. Everything has a cost, everything is done for profit, and a very poor, basic public health service is provided for those who cannot afford health insurance. People who cannot afford the horrendous healthcare costs, even just for basic and vital issues such as giving birth, are in many cases left to fend for themselves. This is the model that the Conservatives are accused of wanting to move towards by starving the NHS of funds and forcing those who can afford to pay (and many who really cannot afford it) into the arms of the private healthcare providers - i.e. Rationing by price.
The European model is not very far removed from the original UK "National Insurance" model - Universal healthcare, free at the point of delivery, is paid for through employer and employee contributions, with a top-up from the government. Everybody is covered - the more you earn, the more you contribute (just like UK tax and NI); non-waged (students, pensioners, unemployed, disabled, sick, carers, etc) are covered by the government. Nobody is excluded because of any existing conditions and nobody pays a higher premium because of any particular condition. Exactly the same principle as in the UK. In terms of costs, the European schemes I have experienced are all similar to the UK NI contributions. I pay approx 1% more where I live compared with the UK.
The first difference about the European model is that the money is ring-fenced and politicians are not allowed to use healthcare as a political football.
The second difference is in the delivery of the healthcare. There are public hospitals, private hospitals and clinics, hospitals run by charities, hospitals attached to universities and medical training centres. The "Health Fund" pays the providers according to an agreed tariff - e.g. a hip operation "costs" the health service exactly the same regardless of where it is carried out. The patient doesn't pay anything.
The third major difference where I live, which has little to do with funding or delivery, is that health care and social care are integrated. So an issue such as bed blocking is far less common - people can leave hospital and go into rehab or social or elderly care because there is an integrated chain. This of course should also happen in the UK - the Health Minister is officially the "Secretary of State for Health and Social Care" but successive ministers have seemingly not understood the second part of the job title.
For clarity - I'm not advocating for Farage. I'm just clarifying how different systems work. Nor do I believe that the NHS is "incurable" or that a move towards a European model is even possible.