You seem to miss the point that the child in nursery still has that bond with the parent who they will see morning and afternoon and weekends as a minimum. And they will also have a key caregiver assigned to them. It takes a village to raise a child. My youngest son has an excellent key worker, he smiles at her and holds his arms for a cuddle just as he does for me. She also has two children slightly older who are in the same nursery as she works. I pay a lot for this nursery, it has a forest school and woods for walks, outdoor play area, an allotment they grow vegetables in, endless craft projects every day, swimming lessons in a private pool...I couldn't provide that at home.
Doubtless not all nurseries are equal and we shopped around and went for the very best we could afford. But honestly when people talk about nurseries on here it sounds like they are talking about prisons, my sons nursery is more like a luxury hotel! Incidentally my eldest went to nursery from 7 months 3 days a week, he's top of his class, despite being one of only two who went to nursery from a young age and now goes to wrap around care. No issues so far and pretty securely attached so not sure when we should expect him to turn into the maladjusted child/adult? I had so much guilt in the beginning especially with conflicting studies but honestly it wasn't needed. If they start young I think it becomes their new normal and far less issues than being attached to mum at the hip in the toddler years then trying to go to nursery or day care later.
My eldest adjusted to school really easily whereas those who had never been separated from mum much really struggled and had a much more traumatic time, how much damage must that have done when they are older and more aware? Noone questions men's decision to work do they? I'll guarantee that many of the SAHP are women, do their kids honestly have a rubbish relationship with dad because he isn't there all the time? It fits some peoples narrative to say nursery is awful and damaging as it confirms their decision to stay at home. A lot of the SAHP I see hated their jobs and were just looking for an excuse to give it up. "Ooooh I couldn't possibley put my child in nursery it's so damaging, I'm selflessly sacrificing my career for little Jimmy". Haha Ok then I believe you..But show me the credible properly designed research saying all kids who've gone to nursery are damaged and doing worse than those with SAHP? Also so many SAHP on here forced to stay with abusive partners because they have no financial independence and yet no recognition of how damaging this is for their kids. It breaks my heart when you see the threads...my partner's cheating etc what can I do I have no money, haven't had a job for years career lost, CV screwed etc, he's hidden all the family money or blown it etc etc.
Brutally, if you have your own money and can afford to be a SAHP then fine but if you are relying on your partner to fund your lifestyle and to stay at home, I would think very very carefully about that decision and your future stability and happiness of your family. It creates a massive imbalance and you could pay for it later..the stats say 1:2 marriages end in divorce after all, 50 percent isn't great odds. Just look at all the many threads on the relationships board with financially dependent women up the creek which absolutely speak for themselves!