@LittleBearPad
To address the 'born and bred' thing that's come up.
The many London Basher threads are full of people making it very clear they don't consider newcomers to be Locals as they're not 'born and bred'.
Yet at the same time they describe anyone moving from London as a Londoner regardless of whether that person is originally from London.
Absolutely 'born and bred' shouldn't matter.
However it's hardly surprising if, after much bashing, some London born people feel if everywhere else is only Local if 'born and bred', same applies to London.
They see people in other areas insist the only 'true Locals' are born and bred, so is it any wonder if some finally snap and point out born and bred Londoners exist too, have also been priced out (more so than most other areas).
If the bashers on this thread from West Wales, Devon, and elsewhere, insist on defining 'their' areas as Local only if born and bred, then it's no surprise if born and bred Londoners, fed-up with the bashing, point out that, by the Basher's definition of Local, many of the 'Londoners' they're moaning about aren't Londoners. They're people originally from Devon, West Wales, or elsewhere.
It's not Londoners (born and bred, or not) who decided to do this type of definition. It's the London bashers. It's also not Londoners (born and bred, or not) who've been on this thread describing incomers as a 'different breed'.