Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is mumsnet right wing?

1000 replies

BrilloPadHairball · 17/05/2024 02:32

There are so many benefits bashing threads on here I’m really starting to wonder. Do the majority of people posting on mumsnet lean heavily to the right?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:06

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:02

Ah, I see. Silly me! Deep down, I knew suicide rates and racism wasn’t on Labours agenda. My cars suspension system has just signed up to the Labour Party though and dreams of giving Corbyn a smooth ride in the rear seat

Edited

I think you may be locked in a 3 year old version of the Labour party....

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:07

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:06

I think you may be locked in a 3 year old version of the Labour party....

Nah, it’s not really changed! Except Starmer comes out of hiding a bit more than during covid.

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:13

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:07

Nah, it’s not really changed! Except Starmer comes out of hiding a bit more than during covid.

Based on what? your own prejudice?

Corbyn & Abbott are not even Lab MPs.

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 11:24

AlisonDonut · 20/05/2024 03:45

Even if the thread was full and each poster on there posted once, that would be 1000 people.

That's not ALL OF MN.

And they are perfectly entitled to vote for whoever is on the ballot. They are perfectly entitled to raise funds and put themselves on there.

People seem to think that because they think one thing, everyone should otherwise they are the scum of the earth.

That is not how democracy works.

I didn’t say ‘all’
I said ‘many’ on the thread and obviously only those who have said so, I wouldn’t know otherwise.

No one’s calling anyone the scum of the earth 🤣
Everyone can chose for their own reasons what, if anything, they do. That’s democracy.

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:25

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:13

Based on what? your own prejudice?

Corbyn & Abbott are not even Lab MPs.

I know it’s a shame. At least they had a view they stuck to, better than slippery I’ll whore myself out to pressure groups, thinks women can have penises Starmer.

more to the point they brought some much needed light entertainment into politics, not to mention the nostalgia of feeling like I was back in the 6th form common room! Never mind they still have plenty of supporters in the Labour woodwork who no doubt will soon by trying to worm their way into the front benches when votes aren’t such an issue.

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 11:29

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 06:51

Thanks for sharing - interestingly for those accusing me as being “far right” I’ve come out as left libertarian which I think is fairly accurate.

Economic Left/Right: -2.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.67

Exactly @Devonbabs just because we don’t agree with everything that comes out of Starmers mouth doesn’t make us right wing.
We are just prepared to step back and analyse irrespective of where the policies and opinions come from.

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 11:36

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 07:41

I think many are afraid to say anywhere public that they'll vote Tory based on women's policies. The usual suspects then accuse them of being single issue right wingers and start pile ons. It's difficult for many women to outright push back when they've been repeatedly instructed that this makes them cruel, phobic, selfish - even on social media under pseudonyms

Having been on the receiving end of quite a bit of scolding by the GC regulars on here, i find this statement very weird.

TWAW and many other issues this Govt stirs up, are all about division, most notably with Brexit... its all about "Lets find an issue, stir the nest and divide people" SM makes its a very easy to do.

The Tories can close down DV refuge's, introduce bedroom taxes, stop the 3rd child getting a penny from the state, raise the number of kids in poverty to 4.3m in poverty, wrecked the NHS, MH & Dental services for all, & destroyed our roads.

Now they come after women who have given their lives to care for loved ones and financially penalise them because they dared to earn a few extra pounds....

Any criticism from the GC regulars on here? Nope.

There’s another thread on here about whether MNs will vote based on transgender issues and given recent Labour updates re spousal consent the discussion is very interesting.

Your second to last paragraph re earning more whilst caring isn’t anything new. When you claim benefits you are required to update the Govn on earnings. It seems some people didn’t. Surely it’s only right that you keep the govn informed so you can be sure that you are receiving the correct amount in benefits. I’m not saying carers don’t deserve payments for the work they do, just that they are required, like everyone else, to keep their applications up to date.

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:37

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:25

I know it’s a shame. At least they had a view they stuck to, better than slippery I’ll whore myself out to pressure groups, thinks women can have penises Starmer.

more to the point they brought some much needed light entertainment into politics, not to mention the nostalgia of feeling like I was back in the 6th form common room! Never mind they still have plenty of supporters in the Labour woodwork who no doubt will soon by trying to worm their way into the front benches when votes aren’t such an issue.

The electorate atm seem to choosing Labour, so fortunately your view is the minority one.

As both are in their 70s, i doubt very much they'll make or want that journey to the front benches but unlike many MPs, should they stand again, they'll both win their seats comfortably... thats democracy.

Your attempts at sarcasm, isn't winning anyone over but it does make you look ridiculous, so keep at it.

AlisonDonut · 20/05/2024 11:38

AlisonDonut · 20/05/2024 09:11

@Alexandra2001

TWAW and many other issues this Govt stirs up, are all about division, most notably with Brexit

How did the current government 'stir up' TWAW as an issue?

Do you mean by banning cancer drugs being given off label to kids? Or by insisting that they consult on sex based rights? Or what?

The Tories can close down DV refuge's, introduce bedroom taxes, stop the 3rd child getting a penny from the state, raise the number of kids in poverty to 4.3m in poverty, wrecked the NHS, MH & Dental services for all, & destroyed our roads...Any criticism from the GC regulars on here? Nope

How would you know what else 'GC' regulars do outside of the board that is only specifically about one topic and thus IS NOT about anything related to the above issues? Many 'GC' regulars change their user names on that board so that they are not linked to any other issues. Where are you getting evidence of this 'nope' from?

@Alexandra2001

Can you please have a look at your two statements and explain them? Cheers.

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:47

@GivePeaceAChance No, it might not be a new thing but its only recently the Govt & HMRC have gone after them.

Due to the nature of the benefit, earn 1p over the threshold and you lose everything, thats why its unfair, especially when you consider the amounts carers save the state.

Its also very difficult to contact HMRC, its all chat bots, thats not really conducive to updating the taxman esp for many carers who are older.

The Equalities commission are now looking at why the GOvt is coming after twice as many women than men (proportionately)

Its a relatively very small amount of money and some leniency should be given, even if they very much reduced the monthly payments, which are having huge impacts on families...

Funny how Michele Mone or Hancocks pub owning mate, can rip off the state for 10s of millions & nothing is done but a carer..... "enemy of the state"

Maybe carers, as they seem not to matter to this Tory govt, should stop caring.

FindThatThing · 20/05/2024 11:50

VolvoFan · 19/05/2024 09:01

Seriously? This place wouldn't exist if it was even remotely right wing.

Can you explain please?
I don’t understand what this means.

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 12:07

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 11:29

Exactly @Devonbabs just because we don’t agree with everything that comes out of Starmers mouth doesn’t make us right wing.
We are just prepared to step back and analyse irrespective of where the policies and opinions come from.

Exactly-blind faith is never a good look in politics

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 12:09

AlisonDonut · 20/05/2024 09:48

I don't think anyone wants MORE of it.

I think what people are saying is that it could get worse under a Labour government, as they don't have anything that anyone can really get a grip on of how they are going to do anything, or what exactly it is they are going to do.

An example. My OH is from the North Midlands of England. Mining country. Was in the Socialist Worker photos of the Miners Strikes. Labour member his whole life. Ex wife is a Labour Councillor. Ex wife has high up Labour Party People round for dinner, daugher has met all the movers and shakers and they are on first name terms.

So completely 'in', all in and then some on Labour.

2 years ago he left the Labour Party. And he'd be called Far Right on here. I often ask him has he worked out what Starmer is planning on doing and nope, still no idea. He is devastated by this.

Me, I'm a shoe in for the Green Party. I literally should be shoving 'Here take my money' at them. I know the movers and shakers in the original Organic movement. First name terms. Invited to gatherings. Was taught how to do various aspects of horticulture by them. I'm a veggie and have been since 1984. I'd be vegan if it wasn't for my osteoporosis and I need calcium. I am utterly heartbroken by what the activisits have done to a hugely caring and concerned group of people whose aims and mission was totally sound.

This isn't FOR the right. This is 'What the fuck happened to the left, I cannot support it any longer'.

This is not about HATE. This is about the realisation that even with the lawfare, the WPATH files, the CASS review and everything else that has happened the LABOUR and GREEN parties cannot turn off the activists within them and so cannot be trusted not to go full steam ahead on Gender Wibble once they get some power. And spending time and money on this means they cannot define their own aims and objectives [AKA a manifesto] that people actually trust.

That's the issue.

You are so right, I couldn’t have put it better.

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 12:12

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:37

The electorate atm seem to choosing Labour, so fortunately your view is the minority one.

As both are in their 70s, i doubt very much they'll make or want that journey to the front benches but unlike many MPs, should they stand again, they'll both win their seats comfortably... thats democracy.

Your attempts at sarcasm, isn't winning anyone over but it does make you look ridiculous, so keep at it.

Who says I’m trying to win anyone over? I’m just stating my beliefs and understanding. I would hope anyone else would look at all the facts and make their own conclusions.

i find myself amusing and that’s all that counts, you’re welcome along for the ride if you fancy it, if not, create your own entertainment.

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 12:13

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 09:50

By better prioritised public spending... so what if Sunak says "i know what a woman is" if he continues to trash female rights?

The Labour party is far removed from that under Corbyn, Labour even ruined their chances to win a by election because they kicked out a candidate.

But again, who is in charge of the UK? who is failing to tackle the anti semitism so many jews are now experiencing? so much so, that many have left the country....

Who has slashed Police numbers so day to day crime, inc racism, isn't being tackled? who closed (to the public) all the police stations so crime can't be reported easily?

Who is ruining carers lives by coming after them for tiny amounts of extra earned income? because of their cruel "cliff edge" benefit cut off.

Lets not include Sunaking making 330k PER DAY from his overseas investments? (he doesn't even invest in the UK)

Its all happening under their watch.

Just correcting those police numbers

re your comment ‘who has slashed police numbers’ comment

In 2010 there were 171 police officers / 100,000 of the population
In 2023 there were 171 police officers / 100,000 of the population

Given the growth in population the ratio is the same as more officers have been employed to allow for growth.

BIossomtoes · 20/05/2024 12:17

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 12:13

Just correcting those police numbers

re your comment ‘who has slashed police numbers’ comment

In 2010 there were 171 police officers / 100,000 of the population
In 2023 there were 171 police officers / 100,000 of the population

Given the growth in population the ratio is the same as more officers have been employed to allow for growth.

It’s rather more complex than that.

https://fullfact.org/crime/police-officer-uplift-numbers/

Government claims on police officer numbers don’t tell the whole story - Full Fact

Newly released figures show the government has reached its target of recruiting 20,000 more police officers since 2019. This is roughly the same number of officers lost between 2010 and 2017.

https://fullfact.org/crime/police-officer-uplift-numbers/

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:26

Brefugee · 20/05/2024 10:17

also can i just toss in here that despite what Adam Ryan said - it is not right wing to say that rights come with responsibilities. It is literally there in the very basic tenet of socialism:

From each according to ability, to each according to need.

That is chock full of responsibility as well as rights.

You misunderstood but to be expected

I think any concept of "with rights comes responsibility"' carries an implicit threat of rights being removed should you not live up to those "responsibilities" - which can be quite arbitrarily defined.

It is very authoritarian to think humans have rights "granted" by their betters and pretty right wing.

The "basic tenet of socialism" says nothing about rights or responsibilities. Funnily enough i don't agree with that either.

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:30

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 09:21

Maybe, if you look at the world, you’ll see similar issues arising in countries across a broad political spectrum.

It happens I favour changing Government every couple of terms as it should keep things balanced. But Labour are a threat to this country much more so than the Tories. In that situation I will continue to vote Tory.

Whatever you say about your position, "continuing to vote Tory" at the moment is not consistent with any form of left or even centre position. The current Conservative party that has moved further right than they traditionally are, and as a result is losing the traditional centre right One Nation Tories to Labour. If you are voting for them, you must be right wing, but either in denial or not being upfront about your position. It's not an insult. Just a statement of fact.

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:35

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 11:02

Ah, I see. Silly me! Deep down, I knew suicide rates and racism wasn’t on Labours agenda. My cars suspension system has just signed up to the Labour Party though and dreams of giving Corbyn a smooth ride in the rear seat

Edited

Why are you assuming the concerns of (some) posters on here is reflective of what Labour position is?

That would be like me assuming that your concerns are reflective of the Tory position!

"The Conservatives don't care about clean drinking water in the UK, their policy is we can just boil it and be grateful not to be in rural Africa!"

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 12:35

BIossomtoes · 20/05/2024 12:17

It’s rather more complex than that.

https://fullfact.org/crime/police-officer-uplift-numbers/

Interestingly, my husband says one of the major issues in performing his role effectively is not so much the lack of policing but what he has to face, everyone”knows their rights” some joker tried to hand DH his phone to film which he was trying to undertake a body search the other day. Everyone is always filming, shouting abuse. Total wasters calling them over neighbour disputes, drunk at 9am.

it’s strange many on the hard left are up in arms about teacher and nurse recruitment:retention saying they need to be treated with more respect yet seem to actively encourage situations which mean police are in greater danger and are also leaving/not joining. Who can blame them!

canp · 20/05/2024 12:35

"Whatever you say about your position, "continuing to vote Tory" at the moment is not consistent with any form of left or even centre position. The current Conservative party that has moved further right than they traditionally are, and as a result is losing the traditional centre right One Nation Tories to Labour. If you are voting for them, you must be right wing, but either in denial or not being upfront about your position. It's not an insult. Just a statement of fact."

Not necessarily. I'm centre. I didn't vote last time. I may vote tory this time because of potential VAT on my dd's sixth form school fees. No other reason at all. If it wasn't for this issue, I probably wouldn't vote.

Brefugee · 20/05/2024 12:37

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:26

You misunderstood but to be expected

I think any concept of "with rights comes responsibility"' carries an implicit threat of rights being removed should you not live up to those "responsibilities" - which can be quite arbitrarily defined.

It is very authoritarian to think humans have rights "granted" by their betters and pretty right wing.

The "basic tenet of socialism" says nothing about rights or responsibilities. Funnily enough i don't agree with that either.

my "patronising twat" alarm went off then.
don't be such an idiot. There is no implicit threat.

If you don't understand just ask.

I'm very far from authoritarian (although my own very personal belief is that the country/world would be better with me in charge as a benevolent dictator)

But you keep harping on. You have no

Devonbabs · 20/05/2024 12:41

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:35

Why are you assuming the concerns of (some) posters on here is reflective of what Labour position is?

That would be like me assuming that your concerns are reflective of the Tory position!

"The Conservatives don't care about clean drinking water in the UK, their policy is we can just boil it and be grateful not to be in rural Africa!"

Sorry, I’m not even sure how you have extrapolated that.

The problems here in a very small area of south Devon- actually only seems to have really affected a few roads - was a problem with a valve and the water becoming infected in a very small reservoir- most locals think the BBC and Sky news blew up the issue and created much worse problems with tourism than the one with water. One particular journalist was stalking the local Facebook groups stirring things up. Nothing to do with which government was in power. Do you live in the area, how much do you know of what went on?

AdamRyan · 20/05/2024 12:41

Brefugee · 20/05/2024 12:37

my "patronising twat" alarm went off then.
don't be such an idiot. There is no implicit threat.

If you don't understand just ask.

I'm very far from authoritarian (although my own very personal belief is that the country/world would be better with me in charge as a benevolent dictator)

But you keep harping on. You have no

You don't get to tell me what my interpretation of those political questions is thanks. And me sharing my own opinion is hardly patronising.

GivePeaceAChance · 20/05/2024 12:41

Alexandra2001 · 20/05/2024 11:47

@GivePeaceAChance No, it might not be a new thing but its only recently the Govt & HMRC have gone after them.

Due to the nature of the benefit, earn 1p over the threshold and you lose everything, thats why its unfair, especially when you consider the amounts carers save the state.

Its also very difficult to contact HMRC, its all chat bots, thats not really conducive to updating the taxman esp for many carers who are older.

The Equalities commission are now looking at why the GOvt is coming after twice as many women than men (proportionately)

Its a relatively very small amount of money and some leniency should be given, even if they very much reduced the monthly payments, which are having huge impacts on families...

Funny how Michele Mone or Hancocks pub owning mate, can rip off the state for 10s of millions & nothing is done but a carer..... "enemy of the state"

Maybe carers, as they seem not to matter to this Tory govt, should stop caring.

I understand the Govn are stamping down on all benefit fraud. I agree this should be done as a regular thing and clamping down or investigating many many months after will put people in dire financial straights.

Is the alternative not to bother investigating at all.

Given far more women are carers than men I suspect that is why it appears women are seeing the brunt of these investigations. That’s not sexist.

Its very clear that everyone must keep up to date with their earnings if they receive benefits. It’s always been this way.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.