The Guardian is radicalised far left extremist now. Used to be quite centrist with leftist leanings years ago. The only people who disagree are radicalised far left extremists. When they hounded Suzanne Moore out for asking some questions about sex being important they fell down a pit and have never recovered.
Of course I'm left wing on real left wing issues such as UBI, socialised healthcare, medicine, unions, fair wages, education - all the actual left wing topics. The problem is that radicalised far leftists now think that being left wing MUST mean identity politics and they all MUST agree on all topics and are totally tribal. God forbid you should say "I don't support Hamas they are a terrorist organisation" just watch the whataboutery and anti semitism erupt, and you will then have a radicalised far leftist screeching at you that you are right wing.
Any discussion at all of women's human rights or push back on anything the radicalised far left disagrees with automatically makes someone right wing in their eyes.
As a result, things like child safeguarding, not being in favour of prostitution and many other human rights issues are now seen by radicalised far leftists as right wing.
Which is rather bothersome for them, since these are just issues that all decent people wish to discuss and have a right to an opinion on - if they want everyone to think of the right wing as being those who will allow discussion and care about women and children's human rights they are going the right way (no pun intended) about it.