Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Can't help thinking King Charles is selfish

1000 replies

Eieiom · 09/05/2024 11:12

Standing back, looking at the Harry situation, I can't help thinking that Charles is the root of all the family toxicity.

He had an affair while married to Diana, which led to their divorce and much unhappiness on her side. After her early death, his children were obviously in a lot of pain. The remote parenting style of the RF probably did little to soften this.
He's managed to marry his affair partner and now he's cutting off one of his sons.
Harry just looks like a really hurt person acting out to me. In most families, they would just be tolerated and forgiven.
I think the RF look very cold.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:53

BIossomtoes · 09/05/2024 19:51

Can you blame her having numerous lovers though?

I can blame her for breaking Julia Carling’s heart. She’d only been married five minutes when her husband had an affair with Diana.

Yes, there were three in Julia Carling's marriage too.

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 19:54

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:43

Having serial seedy affairs with married men? Justify that, why don't you. Making nuisance calls. Generally behaving as if she was unhinged.

Think about that.

How about leaving Diana's memory in peace? She has been dead over 25 years and doesn't need to impress anyone any more. BTW she denied making those calls and isn't here to defend herself.

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 19:55

Gary Lineker passed up the opportunity.
Also, famously, Alan Rickman.
Both men rose in my esteem.

Josette77 · 09/05/2024 19:55

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 19:37

There are quite enough members of the RF - the ones we are still paying for, unlike Meghan - who don't have much of a work ethic. Meghan & Harry left years ago, whether people like them is really neither here nor there.

I'm not sure Meghan has much of a work ethic considering a Spotify exec called her and Harry
" fucking grifters".

I actually think she has lots of ideas but zero patience and follow through. Her projects remind me of my ADHD. She needs to focus on one project and be patient. Slow and steady. Not release things until they are ready.

I think she's smart, but she believed her own hype too much. I loved her blog. I wish she would go back to that.

I actually read some of her book recommendations and they were great. The Tao of Pooh and Te of Piglet. The Four Agreements. The Motivation Manifesto.

Her issue in my opinion is she wants to be loved and adored by everyone all the time. It's not realistic. The US has tabloids she just wasn't that famous. Every huge celebrity deals with haters as much as fans.

I don't think her and Harry can handle criticism. Right or wrong they can't handle it from people they know and people they don't know. It's not conducive to celebrity life to be thinned skinned. And they moved to LA for celebrity life.

DramaLlamaBangBang · 09/05/2024 19:56

CurlewKate · 09/05/2024 19:22

"And nobody ticks the form to say they have used drugs unless they have been convicted. Absolutely no one."

Including me!

I'm not sure why people are so desperate for Harry's visa to be refused. Why is how other countries hand out visas such a massive issue? Were people up in arms about all the druggy pop stars who have sldp been given visas? Do they want him deported from the US to come back here? His wife and children are American. I suspect that what some people would like is for Harry to come back here alone and beg forgiveness from his ' real' family- the Royals. He would be completely forgiven, despite most of the muck being thrown by him. I suspect they wouldn't care if he was separated from his children either. Because it's likely that is what would happen.

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 19:56

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 19:54

How about leaving Diana's memory in peace? She has been dead over 25 years and doesn't need to impress anyone any more. BTW she denied making those calls and isn't here to defend herself.

It is entirely acceptable to talk about people no longer living should we decide it's pertinent to do so.

pestowithwalnuts · 09/05/2024 19:56

I read somewhere that some of the conditions of them meeting up couldn't be agreed to. I think Harry didn't want camilla in the room and KC said ' tough titty she stays '

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 19:56

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:48

Can I remind you that this is what your post said, which I answered. You then started rabbiting on about there being too many people in the RF! Bit non sequitur, IMO!

Sorry you've lost me. I don't know what you are referring to now.

User14March · 09/05/2024 19:56

How do we know PC didn’t suggest a meet up & H said no? PC wouldn’t blab.

DeeCee7 · 09/05/2024 19:58

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:43

Having serial seedy affairs with married men? Justify that, why don't you. Making nuisance calls. Generally behaving as if she was unhinged.

Think about that.

She was doomed in that "relationship" from the start. Remember Charlie boy's "whatever in love means" line in their interview before they even got married?.

She was in love, so was he (just not with her)

Throwing herself down the stairs, and meeting all those men, she was alone in that marraige. She was starved off attention as anyone would be in that set up.

Hairychops77892 · 09/05/2024 19:59

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:43

Having serial seedy affairs with married men? Justify that, why don't you. Making nuisance calls. Generally behaving as if she was unhinged.

Think about that.

You should read what Patrick Jephson has to say about the nuisance call debacle.

The timing of it was very interesting for a start when both Charles and Diana were both trying to win over public approval to their side. It suited many people that Diana was framed as a “mad hysteric” whwn her private secretary who worked for her for eight years said she could be difficult but was always “very grounded”.

Second, Patrick Jephson said there were “many unanswered questions about the whole imbroglio.”

He says that when the story broke, “I asked a contact in the Royalty and Diplomatic Protection Group if there had been such an investigation and if there was a printout of the calls made.
“The answer was ‘yes’ to both questions.” However, within 24 hours the printout was missing.”

Mirabai · 09/05/2024 19:59

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 19:50

So two wrongs make a right do they? Do you condone her pursuit of married men?

I don’t really care, she’s dead. Which she probably wouldn’t be if a 30 year old man had left her alone.

Dibbydoos · 09/05/2024 19:59

I agree @Eieiom and I think zwilliam who has a hige temper and jealousy issue is also driving it.

The press had done a huge number on Harry and Meghan when they initially loved them which is why the scoring on MN is skewed too.

Harry is my favourite younger generation royal. He's honest and admits his faults. Thankfully Americans still like him...

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:00

Mirabai · 09/05/2024 19:59

I don’t really care, she’s dead. Which she probably wouldn’t be if a 30 year old man had left her alone.

No. She'd be alive if she'd worn a seatbelt.

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:00

Dibbydoos · 09/05/2024 19:59

I agree @Eieiom and I think zwilliam who has a hige temper and jealousy issue is also driving it.

The press had done a huge number on Harry and Meghan when they initially loved them which is why the scoring on MN is skewed too.

Harry is my favourite younger generation royal. He's honest and admits his faults. Thankfully Americans still like him...

Honest...😂

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 20:02

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 19:56

It is entirely acceptable to talk about people no longer living should we decide it's pertinent to do so.

I think we should worry about the people who are still with us (especially the ones we are paying for). You are free to think it acceptable; I am free think the gratuitous slagging off of a deceased woman, just because you can, is tacky.

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:03

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 20:02

I think we should worry about the people who are still with us (especially the ones we are paying for). You are free to think it acceptable; I am free think the gratuitous slagging off of a deceased woman, just because you can, is tacky.

I would say that gratuitous slagging off of anyone is tacky.
That's how Harry and Meghan make their living though.

DeeCee7 · 09/05/2024 20:06

EconomyClassRockstar · 09/05/2024 19:45

The fact Charles is getting the majority of the public sympathy pretty much sums up how successful his rebranding campaign over the last 20 years has been. Cannot stand the man and can’t believe he gets to call himself King when he can’t even sort out his own house.

If he was Joe Bloggs he would be getting slaughtered on here. Topics started on here about husbands and boyfriends who haven't behaved anything as bad as he did the original poster has been met with LTB responses.

Ultimately there is a huge reverence for the monarch, that's the difference.

Diana, for all her faults, began a marraige with someone who was in love with another woman.

Mirabai · 09/05/2024 20:08

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:00

No. She'd be alive if she'd worn a seatbelt.

No she’d be alive if she wasn’t the PoW. If she wasn’t chased by paparazzi which prompted a drunk driver to speed under a bridge trying to get away from them. She may not have survived even with a seatbelt, the bodyguard almost did not.

Josette77 · 09/05/2024 20:08

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 19:55

Gary Lineker passed up the opportunity.
Also, famously, Alan Rickman.
Both men rose in my esteem.

Really? I love Alan Rickman. Diana hit on him?

I loved Diana for what she did for the Aids epidemic. I think she was genuinely kind and sensitive.

I also think she likely had BPD and was a handful to deal with. I think William suffered a lot with her as his mother.

I think her childhood greatly affected her and she needed a quiet life with stability and therapy more than anything.

I loved the compassion she brought to her work but I think she was very flawed.

My best friend has BPD. I love her so much but it's such a complicated relationship. Her DH and my DH were best friends since school. The three of us lived together when Joel met her.

There relationship was really awful though. Huge ups and downs. She was ultimately quite abusive to him. He died tragically at 31. For someone with BPD his death was extra horrific for her.

I love her like a sister and she has incredible kindness but she is also explosive and unstable. Has had affairs with married men since. Has an explosive relationship with her now teenager DD. People are rarely all good or all bad.

I feel for Diana. I feel for Charles. I feel for William and Harry.

Harry is now a grown middle-aged man though. It's time to grow up and move one. He can accomplish great things like Invictus but not if he continues to focus on selling out his family.

Him and Meghan have so many opportunities to change the world. If anything that's the legacy he should be focusing on from his mother.

It pains me that all this opportunity is being squandered on public complaints and jam.

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 20:10

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:03

I would say that gratuitous slagging off of anyone is tacky.
That's how Harry and Meghan make their living though.

Again: Harry and Meghan do not live off the UK taxpayer.

It is particularly tacky to slag off a long-dead woman on the grounds that she 'had affairs' and gloss over Charles' contributions to the failure of their marriage. It looks awfully like misogyny to me - and on a site that is about supporting women!

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:10

Excellent points, @Josette77 👍
Diana wasn't a saint, she was a troubled and an unwell person. Good points about H&M.

Blinkingbonkers · 09/05/2024 20:11

People need to stop blaming the rest of their lives on their childhoods. A huge number of people have parents with acrimonious divorces, parents who die (sometimes both!) etc etc. The vast majority have no choice but to get on with it rather than moan & whine.

Mirabai · 09/05/2024 20:12

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:10

Excellent points, @Josette77 👍
Diana wasn't a saint, she was a troubled and an unwell person. Good points about H&M.

And you don’t think she might have been more ok if she hadn’t been seduced by a 30 year old with mistress, married at 18 into a toxic family, thrust into the limelight becoming the most famous woman in the world.

I mean some MNers can’t even answer their own front doors. I’d like to see them cope with that.

IsoldeWagner · 09/05/2024 20:12

Livingtothefull · 09/05/2024 20:10

Again: Harry and Meghan do not live off the UK taxpayer.

It is particularly tacky to slag off a long-dead woman on the grounds that she 'had affairs' and gloss over Charles' contributions to the failure of their marriage. It looks awfully like misogyny to me - and on a site that is about supporting women!

  1. I know H&M don't live off the taxpayer. Never said they did. They live off slagging off the Windsors.
  2. You can criticise women, and women who are dead and not be misogynist. I criticised Margaret Thatcher only this morning.
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.