Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Can't help thinking King Charles is selfish

1000 replies

Eieiom · 09/05/2024 11:12

Standing back, looking at the Harry situation, I can't help thinking that Charles is the root of all the family toxicity.

He had an affair while married to Diana, which led to their divorce and much unhappiness on her side. After her early death, his children were obviously in a lot of pain. The remote parenting style of the RF probably did little to soften this.
He's managed to marry his affair partner and now he's cutting off one of his sons.
Harry just looks like a really hurt person acting out to me. In most families, they would just be tolerated and forgiven.
I think the RF look very cold.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Mirabai · 09/05/2024 16:29

Vastlyoverrated · 09/05/2024 15:47

Whatever the rights and wrongs, the optics are bad when King Charles can't make time to have a quick friendly non-public meeting with Harry and has taken Frogmore cottage away, but allows Andrew to live in his palatial mansion still and Andrew is seen out and about with the Royal Family (even if he is not an 'active' member) at funerals, in church and so on. I think Charles does need to lead the way on forgiveness and being welcome, at least on a personal level, to Harry given he hasn't been accused of a crime nor has he had his trial settled with payments from his mum.

These are all fair points.

Teateaandmoretea · 09/05/2024 16:31

I imagine he is.

We all are it is part of human nature.

Runnerinthenight · 09/05/2024 16:32

blacksax · 09/05/2024 16:28

Well he was popular... until he turned out to be a twat.

I think now tbh he was a twat all along - a well protected twat!

DrJonesIpresume · 09/05/2024 16:34

SluggyMuggy · 09/05/2024 16:28

@DrJonesIpresume Harry asked to meet Charles, Charles said he was too busy. Harry said publicly he understands Charles is a busy man. Like me he understands why a father would be too busy to meet his son for a quick coffee. He is King after all!!

Did he? Oh well there we are then.

Storm in a coffee teacup.

askmenow · 09/05/2024 16:38

Christ! The King is suffering from cancer, undergoing treatment, still does all his daily "Boxes", is a workaholic and chomping at the bit to get back to doing his duties, glad-handing dignatories, meeting the public and has back to back pending appointments.

Harry comes over here on a prearranged visit and can't arrange to come a couple of days earlier to fit round the busy schedule of his father....??

Spoiled and entitled spring to mind....read the room boyo!

Its encumbent upon Harry to make all the suitable adjustments in dates/ diaries etc to facilitate a meet with the King.
After all WHAT does Harry actually DO?

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 09/05/2024 16:40

@Eieiom no sympathy for harry!!! he has been led by the balls to the usa and just acted abominably!!! he was nearly 37 years old and still expecting his father to subsidise him and his awful wife!!!

askmenow · 09/05/2024 16:41

Also conveniently, H& M are off to Nigeria to reconnect with "HER ROOTS"....a pseudo Royal Visit!
So a reconnection with the King prior to the Nigeria visit would have appeared conveniently like HRH was sanctioning it. DOH!

BeaRF75 · 09/05/2024 16:42

wordler · 09/05/2024 14:24

Charles doesn’t get to act simply as a father now he is a head of state - his decisions and actions have to be balanced across personal wants and government needs.

Harry is about to go to Nigeria and be feted by the Nigerian military (who want the chance to host Invictus) - there’s a lot of problematic political issues with the Nigerian miliatary/government - with a lot of nuance for relationships between Nigeria and the UK.

Harry having a very publicized ‘private’ meeting with the UK head of state right before he goes to Nigeria on what looks like a pseudo royal tour is potentially problematic for Charles as head of state because who knows what Harry would claim to have been said by Charles etc.

This is exactly why the late Queen said the half in half out would not work.

Totally this. Being Head of State is not nothing. Of course Charles has to put his job first.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 09/05/2024 16:44

Ooof · 09/05/2024 16:16

I would disagree that Harry was ill treated by the public.
He was always the favourite, the majority of the public adored him, he could do no wrong.

True. And there was a huge amount of goodwill towards both him and Meghan around the time of their wedding.
I never would have thought this before it all kicked off, but in hindsight IMO she always intended to get him away, to enjoy the pluses and the money - and to capitalise on her duchess status - without the tedious royal duties.

potato57 · 09/05/2024 16:46

Manipulated by Camilla, she's a nasty piece of work and turned him into not a particularly nice person either.

Choosing Paris of all places as the first international trip as king & queen was terrible optics, no wonder it got canned.

Don't think he's got long left though tbh.

potato57 · 09/05/2024 16:47

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 09/05/2024 16:44

True. And there was a huge amount of goodwill towards both him and Meghan around the time of their wedding.
I never would have thought this before it all kicked off, but in hindsight IMO she always intended to get him away, to enjoy the pluses and the money - and to capitalise on her duchess status - without the tedious royal duties.

She was already famous, she didn't need anything from them. Being involved with them has done her brand more harm than good. And of course you wouldn't want to live under all the shit she gets from the press here for no reason. Other than Camilla throwing everyone under the bus so she could get good press in return to wipe out the whole Diana thing.

Mothership4two · 09/05/2024 16:48

None of us know what is happening or what has happened. Everything the public know about the RF is filtered through the many Royal offices and their publicity departments and sometimes repackaged and 'spun' again by the media. People who think they know them and their personalities and accurately know the ins and outs of their history are naive.

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 09/05/2024 16:50

I feel sorry for them all. What a shit show.

medianewbie · 09/05/2024 16:50

ThisIsMyRubbishUsername · 09/05/2024 11:51

I think the royal family are a classic narcissistic family. Charles is probably a victim of that as much as anyone else. The Royal family is all about appearances, golden children and scapegoats.
The fact that Harry is so vilified in the press makes me think there is a smear campaign going on in the background to feed it. That’s what often happens to the scapegoat. Just read the relationship/family threads on here. They may be Royal, but they are just as susceptible to toxicity and dysfunction as the rest of us.

Very well said @ThisIsMyRubbishUsername

Chickychoccyegg · 09/05/2024 16:51

I watched the Oprah interview and read Harry's book, and no where does he trash his family, he's spoken out about his love for his dad and William, and his hope to reconcile.
This has all gotten blown out of proportion because the media has now made up so much stuff no one knows who said or did what, as everyone here knows, families are complicated, but most parents wouldn't cut their children off for this reason,also remember Charles wrote his own book, where he spoke harshly about his own parents and upbringing, and they did not cut him off.
It has also been said in court that the leaks were coming from Kensington Palace, so it seems Harry is better off out of it , either way, he seems happy, hopefully he is.
I personally dont think the king has came across well here.

Dolphinnoises · 09/05/2024 16:52

I’m pretty sure (well, I’m not, who knows really!) but I reckon Charles is keeping Harry well outside the firm as the second Hazza knows a thing about Kate’s health it’ll be all over US TV

Sunnyandsilly · 09/05/2024 16:52

Chickychoccyegg · 09/05/2024 16:51

I watched the Oprah interview and read Harry's book, and no where does he trash his family, he's spoken out about his love for his dad and William, and his hope to reconcile.
This has all gotten blown out of proportion because the media has now made up so much stuff no one knows who said or did what, as everyone here knows, families are complicated, but most parents wouldn't cut their children off for this reason,also remember Charles wrote his own book, where he spoke harshly about his own parents and upbringing, and they did not cut him off.
It has also been said in court that the leaks were coming from Kensington Palace, so it seems Harry is better off out of it , either way, he seems happy, hopefully he is.
I personally dont think the king has came across well here.

What book did you read, as it clearly wasn’t spare 😂

WorriedMama12 · 09/05/2024 16:52

SluggyMuggy · 09/05/2024 14:49

@PrincessTeaSet It was racism.
But I am used to white people saying racism was not really racism.

I don't agree it was racism. Would it be racism if a ginger haired parent and a dark haired parent wondered how red/brown their child's hair would be? A parent of Italian heritage and a parent of Scandinavian heritage wondering how olive toned their child's skin would be? No? So why is it racism to wonder how light or dark the child of a mixed race parent and a white parent would be? And no, I'm not white.

LanaL · 09/05/2024 16:56

I don’t know. I kind of agree but I don’t know if it is all along Charles or if it’s the media . There have always been differences in how the media have portrayed Meghan compared to how they have portrayed Kate . I don’t blame her for wanting to distance herself and Harry is just supporting his wife .

Harry watched how his mother was treated and people seem to assume that Meghan is the driving force but maybe , just maybe , he doesn’t want his wife suffering in the way his mother did and as a result does not want his son suffering in the way he did

Puzzledandpissedoff · 09/05/2024 16:57

I'll agree that Charles is thoroughly selfish and the institution toxic, but that still doesn't give Harry or anyone else a free pass for behaving terribly - after all it's perfectly possible for both to be in the wrong sometimes

Personally I'd much rather just get rid of the whole show, but I respect that others feel differently

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 09/05/2024 16:57

potato57 · 09/05/2024 16:47

She was already famous, she didn't need anything from them. Being involved with them has done her brand more harm than good. And of course you wouldn't want to live under all the shit she gets from the press here for no reason. Other than Camilla throwing everyone under the bus so she could get good press in return to wipe out the whole Diana thing.

Edited

She was far more famous after her engagement to Harry. And infinitely more lucratively ‘marketable’.

CosmosQueen · 09/05/2024 16:58

At least Diana and Charles didn’t sell their story for $$$$$ or have a film crew following them around or openly exploit their status and family for financial gain.

blacksax · 09/05/2024 16:59

he's spoken out about his love for his dad and William, and his hope to reconcile

He was hardly going to say otherwise, especially not in front of millions of Oprah viewers. It wouldn't be good for his image.

notacooldad · 09/05/2024 16:59

For example, no woman who has just given birth should ever have to get dolled up and parade her new born in front of TV cameras.
I agree, that makes me so angry!

However this popped up on my instagram the other day and made me laugh

Can't help thinking King Charles is selfish
OneBadKitty · 09/05/2024 17:00

It's not how I see it at all.

To me Charles was as much a victim of 'the firm' as Diana was. Charles was in love with someone who he told was unsuitable as a wife. He was was effectively pushed into an arranged marriage which ultimately broke down on both sides because he was in love with someone else. Diana had pursued Charles because she wanted to marry a prince even though she knew he loved Camilla. Diana then proceeded to destroy Charles's reputation by having multiple relationships before they were divorced and giving interviews about her marriage on national television and had a book published.

Charles was brought up with a very hands off kind of parenting himself and he has acknowledged this and how it made him unhappy. Therefore I can see evidence that he has tried to be more present for his own sons. William seems to have a good relationship with him. I think most people are forgiving of their children, but Harry has done and said some pretty unforgivable things about his family. I guess Charles is pretty cross with him right now.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.