Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Muslim vote (the group, not people generally)

240 replies

Noicant · 07/05/2024 08:22

I was looking at the list of 18 demands from Muslim Vote to Labour and on that list they had

  1. Remove the archaic 'spiritual influence' offence from statute.'

I’m not being funny but they want clergy to be able to direct how people vote. Please tell me Labour are going to just ignore this, I’m not sure that many people want their Imam telling them how to vote either, I know if I were Muslim I’d just ignore him.

I have no particular strong feelings about the Israel stuff, it’s to be expected from the group but that one surprised me a bit.

OP posts:
peanutbuttertoasty · 08/05/2024 20:29

Hawa13 · 08/05/2024 17:34

Last election we had Jewish Rabbi/ leaders urging others to not vote for labour because of Corbyn. Muslims are not sheep that follow whatever religious leaders say. We can make up our minds. I don't think UK and America have real democracy. I voted greens last week and come the general election will go green or independent. This two party dictatorship needs ending and if muslims are the catalyst to bring in real democracy then its a positive thing.

“Muslims are not sheep that follow whatever religious leaders say.”
😂 literally followers of an organised religion! 😂

peanutbuttertoasty · 08/05/2024 20:35

ToWhitToWhoo · 08/05/2024 20:11

'Judeo-Christian blood and sweat?' It seems that it's Judeo-Christian when you want to exclude Muslims. Not sure about the Judeo part during those centuries when the Jews were kicked out of England!

For that matter, plenty of people over the centuries have been burned, beheaded, slaughtered in battle, or at best disenfranchised and excluded from jobs for being the wrong kinds of Christian.

And let's not forget the centuries where Britain depended to quite a degree on the 'blood and sweat' of an Empire. which included plenty of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and other non-Christians.

You do know it’s 2024, right?

peanutbuttertoasty · 08/05/2024 20:36

Hawa13 · 08/05/2024 17:34

Last election we had Jewish Rabbi/ leaders urging others to not vote for labour because of Corbyn. Muslims are not sheep that follow whatever religious leaders say. We can make up our minds. I don't think UK and America have real democracy. I voted greens last week and come the general election will go green or independent. This two party dictatorship needs ending and if muslims are the catalyst to bring in real democracy then its a positive thing.

Also LOL at Muslims bringing in democracy. Can you point to a single Muslim democracy that’s better than what we have here?
There isn’t a single Muslim run country that you could pay me to live in.

ToWhitToWhoo · 08/05/2024 20:53

peanutbuttertoasty · 08/05/2024 20:35

You do know it’s 2024, right?

Yes, I do know. But the PP referred to 'centuries of Judeo-Christian blood and sweat.

peanutbuttertoasty · 08/05/2024 21:02

Yes everyone’s killed everyone for centuries.

Let’s all have a sky fairies amnesty and live peacefully ever after eh? Focus on things like climate change that are real

HoneyButterPopcorn · 08/05/2024 21:11

Sky fairies? Let’s not forget good old communism for mass murder…

Bicyclethief · 08/05/2024 21:25

'Judeo-Christian blood and sweat?' It seems that it's Judeo-Christian when you want to exclude Muslims. Not sure about the Judeo part during those centuries when the Jews were kicked out of England!

For that matter, plenty of people over the centuries have been burned, beheaded, slaughtered in battle, or at best disenfranchised and excluded from jobs for being the wrong kinds of Christian.

And let's not forget the centuries where Britain depended to quite a degree on the 'blood and sweat' of an Empire. which included plenty of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and other non-Christians.

Oh stop being melodramatic. No it's not because we want to exclude Muslims. It's just that they are relatively new to the west and centuries old traditions and history that evolved over time is what makes the west the west and east the east. We have our respective perspectives and sometimes they clash.

The british empire is a relatively recent event. The democracy you see in the west was forged before that and has continued to evolve. Up until recently, Britain (and other parts of the west were still predominantly judeo Christian tradition.

Would I be wrong if I said india was built by Hinduism etc? No so why take so much offence when we say it about Britain or the west?

And by the way, again double standards, Islam conquered all the Middle East (where did all other religious groups go?) and india for centuries not a couple of hundreds of years like Britain. Do you not think they beheaded and slaughtered their way round the world like Christians? And how are other non Muslims treated in Muslim countries, do they not have to pay extra tax, are their populations growing or declining? How many non Muslim get killed in Muslim country for alleged blasphemy?

EasternStandard · 08/05/2024 21:38

Hawa13 · 08/05/2024 17:34

Last election we had Jewish Rabbi/ leaders urging others to not vote for labour because of Corbyn. Muslims are not sheep that follow whatever religious leaders say. We can make up our minds. I don't think UK and America have real democracy. I voted greens last week and come the general election will go green or independent. This two party dictatorship needs ending and if muslims are the catalyst to bring in real democracy then its a positive thing.

How will Muslims be the catalyst, what happens?

And is there a Muslim country you’d prefer?

ToWhitToWhoo · 08/05/2024 22:06

HoneyButterPopcorn · 08/05/2024 21:11

Sky fairies? Let’s not forget good old communism for mass murder…

Yes. Non-theistic ideologies can be just as oppressive as theistic ones when co-opted and misused by authoritarians.

DramaLlamaBangBang · 09/05/2024 08:44

EasternStandard · 08/05/2024 13:38

Yes prioritising men over women just because religion is involved is incredibly harmful.

As we've seen, sections of the Left either love championing men over women or they are wilfully blind, whether or not religion is involved. It's as if all they need is a group that likes to intimidate and oppress women and they are all for it!

DramaLlamaBangBang · 09/05/2024 08:50

EasternStandard · 08/05/2024 21:38

How will Muslims be the catalyst, what happens?

And is there a Muslim country you’d prefer?

As PP said, Muslims who have tried to be catalysts for democracy in most of the Islamic world have been murdered or have had to escape ( many to the UK) to avoid being murdered, so how a tiny group of Muslims funded by the very people who have funded fundamentalist regimes all over the ME and fund terrorism the world over are going to be ' catalysts for democracy ' is some interesting mental gymnastics!

Bicyclethief · 09/05/2024 09:13

Dramallamabangbang

I don't think that was what the PP said. They said they could be a catalyst in the UK.

So, where have Muslims been a catalyst for democracy in other countries?

Where has there ever been the idea or semblance of democracy? Let's just say we believe that terrorism is being funded, where was democracy even before this funded terrorism?

EasternStandard · 09/05/2024 09:15

DramaLlamaBangBang · 09/05/2024 08:44

As we've seen, sections of the Left either love championing men over women or they are wilfully blind, whether or not religion is involved. It's as if all they need is a group that likes to intimidate and oppress women and they are all for it!

They do. Plus use everything they can to let women know they shouldn’t speak up.

Not sure how we got there but it’s sad to see.

KTheGrey · 09/05/2024 10:20

IClaudine · 07/05/2024 20:49

It includes not saying that Islam was spread by the sword or subjugation of minority groups under their rule

Hmm that is not quite what the APPG document linked to says. It says:

Using the symbols and images associated with classic Islamophobia (e.g. Muhammed being a paedophile, claims of Muslims spreading Islam by the sword or subjugating minority groups under their rule) to characterize Muslims as being ‘sex groomers’, inherently violent or incapable of living harmoniously in plural societies.

I don't know why I am bothering, though. It will make no difference.

Edited

What do you mean, it will make no difference?

IClaudine · 09/05/2024 11:06

KTheGrey · 09/05/2024 10:20

What do you mean, it will make no difference?

I meant that my posting the whole of that paragraph rather than a sneakily edited version will make no difference to certain posters on this thread. The ones who believe that a Caliphate is "downloading" etc.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread