'Judeo-Christian blood and sweat?' It seems that it's Judeo-Christian when you want to exclude Muslims. Not sure about the Judeo part during those centuries when the Jews were kicked out of England!
For that matter, plenty of people over the centuries have been burned, beheaded, slaughtered in battle, or at best disenfranchised and excluded from jobs for being the wrong kinds of Christian.
And let's not forget the centuries where Britain depended to quite a degree on the 'blood and sweat' of an Empire. which included plenty of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and other non-Christians.
Oh stop being melodramatic. No it's not because we want to exclude Muslims. It's just that they are relatively new to the west and centuries old traditions and history that evolved over time is what makes the west the west and east the east. We have our respective perspectives and sometimes they clash.
The british empire is a relatively recent event. The democracy you see in the west was forged before that and has continued to evolve. Up until recently, Britain (and other parts of the west were still predominantly judeo Christian tradition.
Would I be wrong if I said india was built by Hinduism etc? No so why take so much offence when we say it about Britain or the west?
And by the way, again double standards, Islam conquered all the Middle East (where did all other religious groups go?) and india for centuries not a couple of hundreds of years like Britain. Do you not think they beheaded and slaughtered their way round the world like Christians? And how are other non Muslims treated in Muslim countries, do they not have to pay extra tax, are their populations growing or declining? How many non Muslim get killed in Muslim country for alleged blasphemy?