Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

For voting Tory

1000 replies

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 12:23

I know what the Tories are and no, I don't like it. But I'm a woman, I have daughters and I come from generations of women who've been abused and dismissed because of their sex. I want better for my girls but I can't do it on my own. I need a government who will (at least give lip service to) supporting me. Am I a Tory? no. But the last thing women need is to be fighting their own government for basic recognition, so Tory it is.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/16/uk-culture-secretary-urges-ban-on-transgender-athletes-competing-in-female-only-events

UK culture secretary urges ban on transgender athletes competing in female-only events

Lucy Frazer calls on sporting officials to draw up ‘unambiguous’ guidelines on gender identity

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/16/uk-culture-secretary-urges-ban-on-transgender-athletes-competing-in-female-only-events

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
EasternStandard · 16/04/2024 17:21

Bloom15 · 16/04/2024 17:19

@MidgeGreensteet they commissioned it because of popular opinion. They don't give a shit about women. They - like most politicians - go where the wind blows on 'smaller' issues.

The Cass review is very good. I don’t think other countries, some of which are further along with gender, have similar

Although some have indicated they will use it to make changes which is good

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/04/2024 17:22

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:17

Which part? Sure start was remarkable in it's success. It was a policy aimed squarely at parents, specifically mothers.

Since then, there have been significant moves to eradicate the use of the word 'mother' from public policy. One of the successes of sure start was the the support of breast feeding. Since then, there have been significant moves to eradicate the word ' breastfeeding from public policy.

Do you understand now, Blossomtoes? Trans pressure groups have sought to eradicate women from public policy. Women's needs are quaint and irrelevant - a bit basic. They have much greater issues to be discussed and funded, so move along women. For clarification - I am parodying these opinions - but this is what was happening in front of our eyes.

Here's what the Tory party said when their Maternity Bill was sent back by the HoL who challenged it for its genderwoo content.

The Tory Party is full of TRAs. That's how we got here.

https://debbiehayton.com/2021/03/17/why-does-penny-mordaunt-think-trans-men-are-men/

Why does Penny Mordaunt think ‘trans men are men’?

It is appalling that the class of people formerly known as women – the sex that gives birth – can no longer always be described by that word. The policy capture by transgender activists has been in…

https://debbiehayton.com/2021/03/17/why-does-penny-mordaunt-think-trans-men-are-men

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:23

TheFormidableMrsC · 16/04/2024 16:51

Quite.

I've clarified three times that I'm parodying opinions you seem to think are unimportant. If it's still not clear, and you care, let me know what specifically you don't understand and I will attempt, again to clarify.

OP posts:
Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:24

NashvilleQueen · 16/04/2024 16:10

Don't tell me you're a long time Labour voter and have never voted Tory before. Am I right?

No

OP posts:
Underthinker · 16/04/2024 17:25

@ru53
On whose watch did the issues highlighted in the Cass review happen?? Oh yes, a conservative government.

I'm not against anyone voting to get the tories out. They've certainly got a lot wrong over the last 14 years.
But the idea that somehow we'd be in a better position specifically on the issue of gender under Labour I find really far fetched. There is just more sympathy for gender ideology within Labour than the tories, and there would be even more so if we'd had a Corbyn led govt after 2017 or 2019. (And I'm saying that as someone who quite liked JC) I find it implausible for example that a Corbyn cabinet minister would have used S35 to stop the Scottish GRR Bill.

PinkiOcelot · 16/04/2024 17:31

Cazpar · 16/04/2024 12:35

I'm sure the millions of women who've been pushed into poverty by austerity, who've seen Sure Start centres scrapped, who've had to wait years for justice because of cuts to the legal system, who can't get decent maternity or gynaecological care thanks to cuts to the NHS, who have seen no progress to fix the pay gap or to tackle punitive zero hours contracts (which disproportionately affect women), who have been crippled by care responsibilities while being paid a pittance, and who've once again seen a budget designed to help men rather than women will be overjoyed.

www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/07/how-a-conservative-budget-failed-to-help-women-again

Couldn’t have put it better myself.

You’re totally right though. The tories have been amazing for women in the last 13 years.

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:31

MrsMurphyIWish · 16/04/2024 16:31

I teach. How many trans people do you know OP? I teach trans students, I teach students who go by different names/pronouns and yes, some parents aren’t aware. Did Labour cause this because as far as I’m aware, the DfE for the last 13 years has been Tory.

The DfE is non partisan! That's the point of the civil service. But yes the minister for education has been Tory, what's your point?

And what's the relevance of the number of trans people I 'know'? Know in passing, intimately, know of? What does it matter?

So you teach trans pupils, what of it? What's your point?

I want at the very minimum for governments and public services to recognise women. Then, let's talk about what we need to improve public services, end violence, tackle discrimination etc etc.

Tans people need these things too. That's a separate battle. The problem is if we lump them in with women, the 0.1% absolutely do shout down the 51%. We know this.

OP posts:
Itsokish · 16/04/2024 17:33

YouHaveAnArse · 16/04/2024 12:55

If this is honestly the most important issue affecting your life and those of the people you love - no issue with their record on housing, austerity, public service cuts, asset stripping the country, fucking up Brexit, fucking up Covid, failing to give a shit about people unable to pay their bills, then I envy you. You're easily manipulated and exactly the kind of voter Tories want.

This .You obviously have a very comfortable life OP !

Allthegoodnamesaregone1 · 16/04/2024 17:34

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:09

Just because you haven't experienced it, doesn't mean it isn't real.

If I haven't had bad experiences in the NHS or education, does that mean everything is fine and dandy?

It isn't an either/ or. Both can be true and trans issues have rewritten policy across education and healthcare, you just haven't been paying attention. Fine, it doesn't affect you and we're all busy people. Just be glad some people have been paying attention.

Not just me, no one I know.
Not work, not socially. Its only ever on MN.

I am in education.
And this isn't an issue
But the cuts are, the threat to our pupils health, safety and education are.

BIossomtoes · 16/04/2024 17:35

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:31

The DfE is non partisan! That's the point of the civil service. But yes the minister for education has been Tory, what's your point?

And what's the relevance of the number of trans people I 'know'? Know in passing, intimately, know of? What does it matter?

So you teach trans pupils, what of it? What's your point?

I want at the very minimum for governments and public services to recognise women. Then, let's talk about what we need to improve public services, end violence, tackle discrimination etc etc.

Tans people need these things too. That's a separate battle. The problem is if we lump them in with women, the 0.1% absolutely do shout down the 51%. We know this.

It’s not a separate battle. If we improve public services everyone wins.

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:36

Itsokish · 16/04/2024 17:33

This .You obviously have a very comfortable life OP !

This post isn't about my life, why not stick to the issues? We all have the capacity to care about many things simultaneously.

OP posts:
Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:39

BIossomtoes · 16/04/2024 17:35

It’s not a separate battle. If we improve public services everyone wins.

Perhaps, but 'everyone' doesn't win equally. We can only improve women's lives by addressing women's needs.

'everyone' means we're blind to sex, race, disability. That suits the powerful just fine. I'm interested in women and I won't shut up about it 🤪

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 16/04/2024 17:40

HebburnPokemon · 16/04/2024 17:19

Rape clause = related to the two child limit on tax creds.

what about it specifically?

Second bookmark

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 16/04/2024 17:45

The Tories are going to lose. Massively.
If you care this much about this single issue you'd be better off joining the Labour Party and campaignig for the change you want from within their ranks. You could even run for office yourself.
Expecting Sunak and his band of crooks and sex offenders to solve this for you is a fools errand.

AdamRyan · 16/04/2024 17:49

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:39

Perhaps, but 'everyone' doesn't win equally. We can only improve women's lives by addressing women's needs.

'everyone' means we're blind to sex, race, disability. That suits the powerful just fine. I'm interested in women and I won't shut up about it 🤪

I'd say we could improve womens lives by:

  1. locking up rapists
  2. doing something about violent and degrading porn that's warping mens views of women, including teenage boys
  3. providing better child care options
  4. providing better elder and disabled care options
  5. providing more flexible work
  6. dealing with poverty

Absolutely none of that requires knowing specifically what "women need"

pointythings · 16/04/2024 17:52

AdamRyan · 16/04/2024 17:49

I'd say we could improve womens lives by:

  1. locking up rapists
  2. doing something about violent and degrading porn that's warping mens views of women, including teenage boys
  3. providing better child care options
  4. providing better elder and disabled care options
  5. providing more flexible work
  6. dealing with poverty

Absolutely none of that requires knowing specifically what "women need"

Exactly this. This is a list of things which disproportionately affect women in the UK. Improving them would massively benefit women.

And it would also benefit men. I'm absolutely fine with that. There are no losers from tackling these issues. None.

Zyq · 16/04/2024 17:56

What on earth do you claim the Tories have done over the last 14 years to rectify the issues you have?

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/04/2024 17:57

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:31

The DfE is non partisan! That's the point of the civil service. But yes the minister for education has been Tory, what's your point?

And what's the relevance of the number of trans people I 'know'? Know in passing, intimately, know of? What does it matter?

So you teach trans pupils, what of it? What's your point?

I want at the very minimum for governments and public services to recognise women. Then, let's talk about what we need to improve public services, end violence, tackle discrimination etc etc.

Tans people need these things too. That's a separate battle. The problem is if we lump them in with women, the 0.1% absolutely do shout down the 51%. We know this.

The Secretary of State for Education is Gillian Keegan. She can't define the word "girl".

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4714929-gillian-keegan-guidance-does-not-need-to-legally-define-what-a-girl-is?page=1

Gillian Keegan: guidance does not need to legally “define what a girl is”. | Mumsnet

Interview in Sunday Times tomorrow [[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/e4e7f968-8eb2-11ed-a303-61858d68dcd6?shareToken=98e0e41c946c1aeea295dc21965f...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4714929-gillian-keegan-guidance-does-not-need-to-legally-define-what-a-girl-is?page=1

BIossomtoes · 16/04/2024 17:57

AdamRyan · 16/04/2024 17:49

I'd say we could improve womens lives by:

  1. locking up rapists
  2. doing something about violent and degrading porn that's warping mens views of women, including teenage boys
  3. providing better child care options
  4. providing better elder and disabled care options
  5. providing more flexible work
  6. dealing with poverty

Absolutely none of that requires knowing specifically what "women need"

Couldn’t agree more.

MsLuxLisbon · 16/04/2024 18:01

Not this crap again.

LilacFatball · 16/04/2024 18:04

Bumpitybumper · 16/04/2024 16:40

Or it could be people making bad choices in terms of diet and exercise? Why is the assumption always that there is no individual responsibility whatsoever? Obesity levels are off the scale and we are becoming more and more sedentary. I'm not saying that inequality etc doesn't play a role but it isn't the whole story and completely ignoring the role of the individual is not going to help solve the crisis.

There are more healthcare models than the USA and the NHS. Many are head and shoulders above both of the aforementioned and involve some form of insurance. The NHS may arguably be cheap but if it's overwhelmed and not actually delivering the health care people need them it's hardly good value is it?

Well, we know it isn't poor choices on a population level, because of the link between poverty and ill health demonstrated across countries. We're a society, despite what Thatcher claimed.

Health and social problems: physical health, mental health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community life, violence, teenage pregnancies, and child well-being, outcomes are significantly worse in more unequal rich countries.

cadygal257 · 16/04/2024 18:07

kitsuneghost · 16/04/2024 12:46

YANBU
You vote whichever manifesto suits you at the time
Voting by habit (I have always been an x voter) is worse than voting to support something you believe in

I Completely agree. I hate hearing people say "oh well I have always x and always will".

That's one of the reasons why things don't change. Vote for whichever party's manifesto you agree with. We may start to actually see some change

AllPrincessAnneshorses · 16/04/2024 18:07

YouHaveAnArse · 16/04/2024 12:55

If this is honestly the most important issue affecting your life and those of the people you love - no issue with their record on housing, austerity, public service cuts, asset stripping the country, fucking up Brexit, fucking up Covid, failing to give a shit about people unable to pay their bills, then I envy you. You're easily manipulated and exactly the kind of voter Tories want.

Exactly.

But, but the real enemy is the 0.5 pc of people who don't identify as the gender they were born into. NOT.

Sharptonguedwoman · 16/04/2024 18:09

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 12:23

I know what the Tories are and no, I don't like it. But I'm a woman, I have daughters and I come from generations of women who've been abused and dismissed because of their sex. I want better for my girls but I can't do it on my own. I need a government who will (at least give lip service to) supporting me. Am I a Tory? no. But the last thing women need is to be fighting their own government for basic recognition, so Tory it is.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/16/uk-culture-secretary-urges-ban-on-transgender-athletes-competing-in-female-only-events

Yes I know, grim isn't it. If anyone comes canvassing, my go-to question will be, 'What is a woman?'. My thinking is to get these awful people out and go from there. Lobby and lobby one's MP. Makes me so cross.

MyDentistIsCalledCrentist · 16/04/2024 18:12

Whatismypasswordthen · 16/04/2024 17:36

This post isn't about my life, why not stick to the issues? We all have the capacity to care about many things simultaneously.

Of course it's about your life. You've clearly not been majorly affected by the trashing the Tories have done to the country, otherwise you wouldn't dream of voting for more poverty, a shitter NHS, and the continued bullying of the disabled, amongst the legion of things that have been done to ruin the lives of Britons.

When you have to worry about where your next meal is coming from, or how on earth you're going to keep your house warm and free of mould, or how you're possibly going to get any treatment for your health issues, you don't have time to be worrying about who does or doesn't have a penis.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.