That has nothing to do with trans people, no government would have prevented him he was dressed as a man! What he claimed is irrelevant and had no bearing on him being caught and punished.
You're missing the point. Any male who says he is transwoman IS transwoman. They can't be questioned. And, he was emboldened to enter because he knew all he had to do was claim to be transwoman.
It isn’t legally in. In reality anyone can identify as anything and walk into public spaces in most places in the world. In very tightly controlled environments where there are vulnerable people eg prisons no one can just do that. Labour have said they don’t support self ID. You want to think they do to justify your right wing voting inclinations.
When women are PUNISHED for calling a man out, that is self-ID. Whether you want to admit it or not. When Labour say TWAW, they are saying they support self ID. Pure, plain and simple. And like most feminists, I am left wing. Interesting though you feel the need to assume I am a right wing voter.
Where is this commonly happening?
Everywhere. In many countries.
Is this a daily problem blighting the lives of lots of women? Who? Where?
Yes, it is, the risk of men in our spaces is a daily risk. It's a risk I, as a rape survivor, weigh up every single day. As do Domestic Violence survivors. We think about it every.single.day.
Bryson is in Scotland and in a male prison.
He was originally in a female prison (and it doesn't matter that he was 'segregated').
‘Any man’ can still be called out and be removed from these spaces.
WRONG! See the swimming centre example, also Planet Fitness, etc etc.
The occasional trans woman minding their own business in a toilet or changing room
Transwomen are MEN. 92% of them retain their penis and testicles. They are men, with cock and balls... only in a dress, instead of a suit and tie. Minding their business or not, they are still men accessing womens spaces. And, as you prove, we cannot all them out or remove them.
There have been transitioned people in toilets for decades under all governments. There will always be some.
No there haven't been. Because almost none of them actually transition and they always stand out, and we women could back then, call them out. And regardless, even if they wre there 'for decades' (which is a lie), that doesn't make it right. The 'they were always there' is not the defensive supporting argument or justification you think it is.
Most have said the occasional (again rare) trans woman isn’t a problem.
I can assure you it IS a problem to the RAPE VICTIM or BATTERED WOMAN who comes across them, even if the ingratiating person that runs the place says it isn't. There have been 4 different rapes by transwomen in 4 (four) separate battered womens hostels in Canada (yes I know, not UK but transwomen have dangerously higher patterns of sexually offending universally) alone. How many would be enough for you? Give us a number where you would think excluding these men are justified.