Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not apologise when I meant what I said?

339 replies

MotherOfOlafs · 05/03/2024 15:02

MIL round for Sunday lunch last week, all very pleasant to start with. MIL always has a lot of comments about others appearances which we tend to ignore as rising to it just seems pointless. Until during lunch she told us about a woman she’d seen at a restaurant who had some facial hair. She then told us she’d taken a photo of this lady obviously without her knowledge and sent it to some friends who’d then ‘made some very funny comments’. She was laughing her head off while she was telling us this. To be perfectly honest it made me furious and I replied ‘I didn’t realise you were such a nasty bully MIL’.
The rest of the day was spent in silence pretty much. She now won’t speak to any of us (fine with me but DH is upset). He’s asked if I’ll consider apologising. I honestly don’t think I should, especially as this all went on in front of DD14 and I would never want her to think this behaviour is excusable.

OP posts:
SparklyLimeJoker · 05/03/2024 19:35

As the mum of an adult DD with severe facial hair from PCOS thank you for calling out your MIL on her shitty behaviour.

Dentistlakes · 05/03/2024 19:40

YANBU. She was extremely nasty and setting a bad example
for your daughter. Well done for speaking up and no, you shouldn’t apologise.

wronginalltherightways · 05/03/2024 19:52

PCOS, post-menopause, hormone imbalances ... all causes of facial hair in women, and they already feel bad enough about it no doubt without people like your MIL making it worse with that kind of behaviour.

Your DH is deluded if he thinks you are the one that needs to apologise here.

Libertysparkle · 05/03/2024 19:55

Don't apologise. Maybe to keep the peace say you want to move on but I still stick by what I said.

Olika · 05/03/2024 19:55

Don't apologise.

BonheursTrousers · 05/03/2024 19:56

iwafs · 05/03/2024 17:53

No, because the thing is, children are children and they are learning how to behave. So that's why you label the behaviour, not the child.

MIL is a grown ass adult and is a fucking horrible cow.

This ☝🏼

My pil are like this, awful bully’s and similarly also cry victim when called out as racist, sexist, homophobic etc. Arseholes need to be called out as arseholes.

echt · 05/03/2024 19:57

I agree with the the posters who said what the MIL did wasn't bullying: you can't bully someone who doesn't know it's happening. Also it has to be behaviour over time. OTOH I can see from the OP's point of view, the nasty comments about other people's appearance have gone on over time, so it has that feel.

Call the behaviour, not a name. I don't agree with posters who said tell her she was being unkind., way too weak. I prefer "That was deeply unpleasant" with possibly "I don't want you to do it this house again, ever."

These matters aside, should the OP apologise? Absolutely not. The spirit of what she said is the important thing.

Cornettoninja · 05/03/2024 20:05

In the spirit of diplomacy, if you want to for your DH’s sake, I would be prepared to put it behind me so long as that kind of behaviour wasn’t repeated in mine or my DD’s presence again.

Absolutely no apology to her would be offered but I’d throw her a bone of forgiveness and see if she was capable of contrition.

Thepossibility · 05/03/2024 20:08

Don't you dare apologise, she needed to be told! She needs to feel ashamed of herself!
She's obviously had too many “nice" people accepting her shitty behaviour for too long and now she actually thinks it's funny to mock innocent people.
Well done to you!

EarringsandLipstick · 05/03/2024 20:10

She was a bully. People like her don't either understand or deserve a softly softly approach.

I don't necessarily agree.

Her behaviour was bullying. There is a difference (particularly if she is otherwise a good person).

It's not about softly, softly - I'd absolutely call out the behaviour quite clearly. I think the phrasing by OP was incorrect and unlikely to help.

EarringsandLipstick · 05/03/2024 20:11

LovelyTheresa · 05/03/2024 17:30

Honestly this thread is making me shake my head. All the mealy mouthed hypocrisy of 'well MIL did something awful, but it's not nice to hurt her feelings'. Why not? Why do her feelings matter? She sounds like the sort of person who doesn't give a crap about anyone else and then plays the victim.

What post did you read that said this? I haven't seen any.

Most are agreeing fully with OP. Some (like me) are agreeing the behaviour was abhorrent but calling her a bully wasn't the best (or fairest) way to address it.

Spirallingdownwards · 05/03/2024 20:17

So I think we can all agree if the OP "has" to say something it should be "I shouldn't have called you a bully because it doesn't meet the criteria. I should have just said your behaviour is vile, unacceptable and you are simply nasty."

YoureALizardHarry11 · 05/03/2024 20:18

What a pathetic woman. A grown adult thinks it’s fine to bully someone like that as if she’s back on the playground. People who are happy with themselves don’t comment on others appearances so really I suppose she should be pittied for having such a low opinion of herself that she has to pick apart other people. Pay no mind to her opinions, and don’t apologise. If anything I’d be giving her a piece of my mind.

Pancakefam · 05/03/2024 20:20

LovelyTheresa · 05/03/2024 17:13

So saying that someone is a bully is bullying? That makes zero sense, and also by that logic you just bullied the OP!

Well, no... I criticised the behaviour. Do you honestly not understand the difference?

LovelyTheresa · 05/03/2024 20:22

Pancakefam · 05/03/2024 20:20

Well, no... I criticised the behaviour. Do you honestly not understand the difference?

'You are a bully' is exactly the same as saying 'you are bullying someone'. Exactly the same. You are hairsplitting and arguing semantics in order to defend someone who is not worthy of defending. Why do you feel the need to do that exactly?

LovelyTheresa · 05/03/2024 20:24

Spirallingdownwards · 05/03/2024 20:17

So I think we can all agree if the OP "has" to say something it should be "I shouldn't have called you a bully because it doesn't meet the criteria. I should have just said your behaviour is vile, unacceptable and you are simply nasty."

Precisely. All this hairsplitting is utterly nonsensical and I think very very British. We would rather criticise people who call out awful behaviour than the behaviour itself.

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 05/03/2024 20:24

It may have been better if you already had one too many to drink and the case of, "I've started and I'll finish when ready" lol😂

But in all seriousness, taking the family dynamics into account, apologise
by saying something like " Sorry MiL I should have not said that as your comments took me back to the school days and bullies making fun of people... I should have said, something like 'Sorry MiL that is not nice nor funny."

Job done. If not, then don't hold back next time as she will learn to keep her trap shut with you present.

TBH, it is very disgusting what she did. How would she feel if pics were taken of her when she was older and with a small beard and it was taken without her consent then passed around to like-minded simple idiots to have a good old lol at her expense??

Your choice, your family.

echt · 05/03/2024 20:28

LovelyTheresa · 05/03/2024 20:22

'You are a bully' is exactly the same as saying 'you are bullying someone'. Exactly the same. You are hairsplitting and arguing semantics in order to defend someone who is not worthy of defending. Why do you feel the need to do that exactly?

It is different, not mere semantics, and it's drummed into teachers all the time; deal with behaviour, don't call names. After all, it's the behaviour you want to change. Sure it would be nice if such a person changed fundamentally, but unlikely in the short term, but the behaviour can be called out right away and told to stop.

DottieMoon · 05/03/2024 20:29

Mrsttcno1 · 05/03/2024 15:06

I 100% would not be apologising for that, good on you for calling her out on it. Horrendous behaviour from her!

Completely agree. Well done for saying something. Such disgusting behaviour from her.

Allwelcone · 05/03/2024 20:29

EarringsandLipstick · 05/03/2024 20:10

She was a bully. People like her don't either understand or deserve a softly softly approach.

I don't necessarily agree.

Her behaviour was bullying. There is a difference (particularly if she is otherwise a good person).

It's not about softly, softly - I'd absolutely call out the behaviour quite clearly. I think the phrasing by OP was incorrect and unlikely to help.

I agree with this. Her behaviour was awful but ideally if you have "feedback" you say something like "I don't agree with that" in public, then something stronger 1-1 in private

DottieMoon · 05/03/2024 20:36

mylovelytulips · 05/03/2024 17:37

Eas it a kind thing your MIL did? No it was horrid
But on the other hand it is not bullying. That isnt what bullying means The butt of the joke was an oblivious stranger who will never know,
You do not have to give voice to every thought that enters your head, Everyone there would have formed their own opinion on your MIL's behaviour. You could have just read the room, kept your mouth shut and not spoiled everyone else's afternoon.

Keep your mouth shut and not spoil everyone’s afternoon!

What a load of BS. This is why people like the MIL think they can say such disgusting things about people and get away with it.

YoureALizardHarry11 · 05/03/2024 20:40

echt · 05/03/2024 20:28

It is different, not mere semantics, and it's drummed into teachers all the time; deal with behaviour, don't call names. After all, it's the behaviour you want to change. Sure it would be nice if such a person changed fundamentally, but unlikely in the short term, but the behaviour can be called out right away and told to stop.

This is correct, technically. When it comes to children, you shouldn’t label the child’s character, rather you should label the behaviour by saying something like ‘’stop acting like a bully, it’s not nice’’ as labeling the child’s character can be damaging to them.

However, OP’s MIL isn’t a child and has form for commenting on other’s appearances so I think the label is probably accurate in this case

WandaWonder · 05/03/2024 20:42

But basically you have decided for the whole room what is appropriate, sure one on one say it, but I also get tired of 'I know best and I want everyone to hear it' regardless of what I would think of the original issue

Notsuredontknow · 05/03/2024 20:45

Well done OP! Her and her friends sound hideous. Hopefully this’ll be the end of her visits for a while.

Isitreallythough · 05/03/2024 20:49

ImCamembertTheBigCheese · 05/03/2024 15:15

I'm going to go against the grain here and say YABU. There was a nicer way you could have conveyed what you did given you knew she'd be upset at your words and that, as your MIL, it is not like you won't see her in the future.

"I'm surprised at you MIL, that was an incredibly unkind thing to do"

I agree it would be better to focus on it being a horrible thing to say rather than saying that she is a bully, which is a bit bridge-burning. Totally agree that she behaved horribly.