Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Just told DH I will Divorce him over a fucking wedding Part two

716 replies

KeenHiker · 04/03/2024 09:52

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5018658-just-told-dh-i-will-divorce-him-over-a-fucking-wedding

I can’t believe the responses that I had.

Essentially I am going to that wedding so it won’t backfire on me and then as people have suggested reassess when everything has calmed down after Easter.

I am never going to look at MiL in the same light as she clearly thinks my daughter is an impediment to her own granddaughter.

Just told DH I will divorce him over a fucking wedding | Mumsnet

This is my first post. I think my head’s going to explode. BiL has shown no interest whatsoever in my daughters, not my eldest who isn’t my husband’...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5018658-just-told-dh-i-will-divorce-him-over-a-fucking-wedding

OP posts:
2Hot2Handle · 04/03/2024 20:44

KeenHiker · 04/03/2024 14:34

All I have ever wanted was that my DH treated my eldest well and on a par with any children we had together and I would say that he has. We generally have a happy life.

I never expected him to leave her equal amounts in his will or for his family to leave her an inheritance, I think the fact that we have had wills for five years proves this.

Naively however, I hadn’t anticipated that his family would leave anything directly to the youngest, I assumed DH would only inherit and then many decades down the line youngest. I am upset about any inevitable disparity coming early than expected. The upset was not my expecting in-laws to leave eldest anything.

DH asked about schools for youngest about 18 months ago. I said that I was happy with primary that eldest went to and that was the end of conversation, I had no idea that he had this resentment about it.

As for BiL and SiL I genuinely think that they have done nothing wrong. I don’t think that my eldest even crossed their minds.

I believed SiL three years ago when she said that she hadn’t been told of eldest’s existence. She also seems to imply that it was cousin’s wife who told her of there being no input from father’s side only yesterday. You can interpret this as the in-laws not gossiping or my eldest being beneath their notice.

DH would argue that he did ask re: eldest being invited to wedding but he initially accepted BiL saying five others plus a baby would also have to be invited. He also would say that his mother argued for inclusion as well. He doesn’t think the wedding is significant.

He maintains that he loves her but can’t make others treat her the same.

I’ve been on your side all the way and still am, but your latest updates have got me wondering a couple of things.

Does your DH feel like he has equal parental rights over your eldest? If he doesn’t, could he be putting up barriers to protect himself? You may have felt all these years, that as he’s not DD’s biological father, you didn’t feel right expecting him to treat her as such financially, or with decision making, such as schooling. Instead you’ve been happy that he’s treated her equally in everyday life, but tried not to burden him with the bigger parenting stuff. However, HE may feel like you’re holding him at arm’s length somewhat and actually he’d like to have a say in elder DD’s schooling and support her financially, such as in his will, or with private schooling. I think this is worth putting to him, as it may bring you guys back on the same page.

The other question in my mind, is if he has been influenced by his family, when it comes to his thinking about equal treatment, when it should be him teaching them how to behave with his blended family. The fact that MIL has gotten involved to try to resolve the problem and SIL has tried to extend an olive branch by messaging you directly (albeit badly), suggests that they do care about resolving this, but really need DH to be clear about how his DSD should be treated long term to clue them in to the deeper issue. Perhaps they’re on the defensive because they know they’re wrong, but are ashamed to admit it. They need someone to help them fix the problem and it should and can be DH, by telling them what you really need. Fine she won’t inherit from them, but she should be an equal participant in family events, as you are a family of 4. Seems like if DH could be firm about this position, their attitudes may well change for the better.

In this case, I would ask DH to speak to them about the genuine issue and how he’d like them to behave. Show that he loves and will stand by you guys. Be the stronger character. If he agrees to that, you could agree to apologise for reacting so angrily, explain that you love your family and daughters and want everyone to feel equally loved and that you hope they can understand. Also you could thank them for talking about this and working to resolve the issue (you don’t have to forgive them privately, but publicly it could bury the hatchet and allow things to settle).

Of course first, you need to be okay with DH, so tackle the first point, first!

Just a thought!

IncyWincyEyeroll · 04/03/2024 20:45

Yes. People do in fact do that. Each child would benefit from the opportunities available to them - that is fairness. Fairness is not denying one to compensate the other.

Well, we differ then. I think anyone doing that is, frankly, insane, unless significantly different needs are in play. The only time I've known that work ok is when an older sibling got into a selective school, and the younger didn't get in so went to private school. That worked only because the older one was confident both that his parents had chosen the 'best' school available to him, and would have paid for private had he not passed the 11+.

Interestingly, there was a long running thread a few months ago where the op was asking for help with her adult daughter who was struggling on every level: job, relationship, friends, family. It turned out that the op had made a lot of money through a business and had given her subsequent two children (I think half siblings, but can't remember and it doesn't really matter) private school, etc. Older daughter, and relationship with mum and sisters, was pretty destroyed by it, and posters were fairly unanimous that the unfairness was wrong. But I think a lot of people are projecting step-parent feelings here.

IncyWincyEyeroll · 04/03/2024 20:51

Yes, I would. I don't know why that is so strange to some people. I would have done it for all of them had it been possible. Anyone who has raised more than one child knows that there will be times in their lives when one child will have opportunities that the others won't. Finances change. Environments change. Opportunities change. That's life.

I have three children and the idea of treating them so starkly differently is absolutely very strange to me. I (genuinely) hope it works out for you, but I can't see that producing anything other than resentment and damaged sibling relationships, unless there is something else in play to 'justify' it (particular needs, etc)

Surprisedbuthappy · 04/03/2024 20:54

Caerulea · 04/03/2024 20:44

This thread...there are some truly awful examples (or excellent, I should say) of how privilege crushes people's humanity. It's pretty obvious which of the pp went to private school & how that fosters the obvious elitist attitude.

In an ordinary situation, the younger sister would NOT resent the elder sister at all for not going private, that's not normal behaviour. That, my friends, is learned behaviour cos you folk truly believe you're better than everyone else so it makes SENSE to you she'd feel bitter cos now she's got to be like a whole pleb any everything cos of this awful woman & her pauper child. Just listen to yourselves!

The best thing for the younger daughter is to do state schooling (as OP wants) cos at least then she won't be one of you posting this kind of bullshit in 20ys in response to the obvious maltreatment a young girl is on the receiving end of.

Not in a million years is it better for her to learn to be an elitist snob by separating their schooling. Tbh, I see zero value for sending anyone given what it seems to do to many ppl. Shameful.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

I wasn't brave enough to post this myself, but I was thinking it!

InterIgnis · 04/03/2024 20:55

IncyWincyEyeroll · 04/03/2024 20:45

Yes. People do in fact do that. Each child would benefit from the opportunities available to them - that is fairness. Fairness is not denying one to compensate the other.

Well, we differ then. I think anyone doing that is, frankly, insane, unless significantly different needs are in play. The only time I've known that work ok is when an older sibling got into a selective school, and the younger didn't get in so went to private school. That worked only because the older one was confident both that his parents had chosen the 'best' school available to him, and would have paid for private had he not passed the 11+.

Interestingly, there was a long running thread a few months ago where the op was asking for help with her adult daughter who was struggling on every level: job, relationship, friends, family. It turned out that the op had made a lot of money through a business and had given her subsequent two children (I think half siblings, but can't remember and it doesn't really matter) private school, etc. Older daughter, and relationship with mum and sisters, was pretty destroyed by it, and posters were fairly unanimous that the unfairness was wrong. But I think a lot of people are projecting step-parent feelings here.

It really isn’t that unusual. I went to private school myself and met a few people whose siblings had gone to state school. Some because of situations like the one in the OP, and others because the financial fortunes of their family had changed. The parents provided to their children what they were able to, and what they were able to do was subject to change.

Denying someone opportunities in the name of fairness does not in any way guarantee positive relationships.

HollyKnight · 04/03/2024 20:55

It turned out that the op had made a lot of money through a business and had given her subsequent two children (I think half siblings, but can't remember and it doesn't really matter) private school, etc. Older daughter, and relationship with mum and sisters, was pretty destroyed by it, and posters were fairly unanimous that the unfairness was wrong.

Jealous will do that to people. Similar effect to the resentment the OP's youngest might feel when she realises she was denied it because of her sister.

CatamaranViper · 04/03/2024 20:56

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 20:28

So, what if (bare with me...)

Eldest DD didn't exist. There was just youngest DD between DH and OP. Youngest DD goes to private school.

DH and OP divorce. OP meets new man. Has child. They can't afford private school for their child. Do people think DD should be removed from private education because neither of the parents of her half sibling can afford the fees for that separate child?

Why penalise one child just so both have an equal lesser education? Yes yes private schools aren't always better but let's not pretend 99% of the time they are.

Pointless questions because the eldest does exist and no one is being pulled out of an established school.

losthj · 04/03/2024 20:58

Gosh this is growing.

I absolutely agree no child should be excluded from a family wedding invite.

Like others have said this entire inheritance issue is another discussion, one which with hindsight should have taken place long ago.

I don't think you can influence or assume grandparents leave inheritance to anyone.

Best case their own children and they argue it out.

So many issues requiring legal advice. Where do children go if, sadly, both of you were killed?

Are they split?

Does DH will leave everything to you and vice versa?

What if you die and he rejects eldest?

What if both die and family do.

This, whilst awful does highlight the issues about step children and legal position.

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 20:58

CatamaranViper · 04/03/2024 20:56

Pointless questions because the eldest does exist and no one is being pulled out of an established school.

Tell me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario without telling me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario

InterIgnis · 04/03/2024 20:59

Caerulea · 04/03/2024 20:44

This thread...there are some truly awful examples (or excellent, I should say) of how privilege crushes people's humanity. It's pretty obvious which of the pp went to private school & how that fosters the obvious elitist attitude.

In an ordinary situation, the younger sister would NOT resent the elder sister at all for not going private, that's not normal behaviour. That, my friends, is learned behaviour cos you folk truly believe you're better than everyone else so it makes SENSE to you she'd feel bitter cos now she's got to be like a whole pleb any everything cos of this awful woman & her pauper child. Just listen to yourselves!

The best thing for the younger daughter is to do state schooling (as OP wants) cos at least then she won't be one of you posting this kind of bullshit in 20ys in response to the obvious maltreatment a young girl is on the receiving end of.

Not in a million years is it better for her to learn to be an elitist snob by separating their schooling. Tbh, I see zero value for sending anyone given what it seems to do to many ppl. Shameful.

No, it is quite normal for someone to become resentful as a result of being denied opportunities they could otherwise have, because ‘it’s not fair!’.

Thankfully OP’s husband does have a say in his daughter’s schooling, and OP can’t unilaterally decide ‘what’s better’ is for her youngest to be disadvantaged as a means of compensating her eldest.

Surprisedbuthappy · 04/03/2024 21:04

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 20:58

Tell me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario without telling me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario

What about the hypothetical scenario I posted earlier? Two biological parents, two children. They can afford to send one child to private school but not both. Do they choose their favourite and just send them because why deny both children in the name of fairness?

Surprisedbuthappy · 04/03/2024 21:08

Oh, and just to make it fun, Daddy thinks they should pay for the the eldest child to go because they were there first so have the bigger claim, but Mummy thinks neither should go since they can't pay for both...

ArrrMeHearties · 04/03/2024 21:09

I'm annoyed on your behalf op what a shit show

CatamaranViper · 04/03/2024 21:09

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 20:58

Tell me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario without telling me you don't understand a relative hypothetical scenario

Oh I understand, but it has absolutely no relevance to this thread or OPs problem at all.
If you're curious how people feel about this, start your own thread.

HollyKnight · 04/03/2024 21:13

IncyWincyEyeroll · 04/03/2024 20:51

Yes, I would. I don't know why that is so strange to some people. I would have done it for all of them had it been possible. Anyone who has raised more than one child knows that there will be times in their lives when one child will have opportunities that the others won't. Finances change. Environments change. Opportunities change. That's life.

I have three children and the idea of treating them so starkly differently is absolutely very strange to me. I (genuinely) hope it works out for you, but I can't see that producing anything other than resentment and damaged sibling relationships, unless there is something else in play to 'justify' it (particular needs, etc)

I haven't done it. I was responding to your hypothetical question. But mine have had different opportunities in other ways. I have one super popular child who gets invited to everything. She has been away on holidays with her friends' families. She gets more presents on her birthday because she has more friends. She has bigger parties because she has more friends. My son is a lot shyer. Has a small friendship group, smaller parties, and has never been away on non-family holidays. He's jealous of her. He has always had his own room though. DD1 has to share with her sister. She hates that. It's not fair etc.

But I suppose many here think I should not let her go away with her friends, make her give away half of her birthday presents, and make her cull her friendship group, while I pluck an extra bedroom out of my butt so everyone can feels equal.

Also, as someone with a severely autistic brother, I missed out on a loooot as a child because of people thinking everything had to be fair, but also a lot of guilt put on me for the things I did get to do differently. Justifiable or unjustifiable doesn't matter, everyone will suffer in one way or another.

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 21:13

CatamaranViper · 04/03/2024 21:09

Oh I understand, but it has absolutely no relevance to this thread or OPs problem at all.
If you're curious how people feel about this, start your own thread.

It has absolute relevance. I'm baffled as to why people claim not to see it.

It's a different version of depriving one child from their father's support because an unrelated man has fathered a half sibling with their mother.

Justkeeepswimming · 04/03/2024 21:19

Codlingmoths · 04/03/2024 19:58

he didnt so much as do a bad job of communicating this, he just lied. ‘I’d give her (older daughter) my heart’ etc, lots of language about how he doesn’t differentiate but can’t help what his family think. Yes he does, and he accepts what his family think because he agrees with it. You can’t have a child who lives there 100% of the time treated so differently.

@Codlingmoths

The girl has a father - HE and his family have responsibility for/to her.

It is not the DH’s responsibility to pay for her or whatever else. He is doing more than most step fathers by taking on the responsibility of parenting her and providing for her day to day needs on a full time basis.

His family have absolutely no obligation to do anything for her whatsoever - she is not their family - and he shouldn’t have to pay for major things for her — she has two parents already!!

CatamaranViper · 04/03/2024 21:25

WillYouPutYourCoatOn · 04/03/2024 21:13

It has absolute relevance. I'm baffled as to why people claim not to see it.

It's a different version of depriving one child from their father's support because an unrelated man has fathered a half sibling with their mother.

How does it help OP?

PrimalOwl10 · 04/03/2024 21:29

You are enjoying the drama of it all hence the second thread. You expect all or nothing approach the comment of the photos with the grandmother, inheritance etc says it all. You can't make them accept your dd on the same level as their biological niece. I asked if the other thread does she call mil grandma your bil and sil auntie and uncle? How often does she seem them?

SomeCatFromJapan · 04/03/2024 21:30

Jealous will do that to people. Similar effect to the resentment the OP's youngest might feel when she realises she was denied it because of her sister.

I remember that thread and it wasn't jealousy. The oldest girl had been neglected of her mother's time as she put all her energies into her business. The younger two benefitted from all the time, love and money the eldest never got.

HollyKnight · 04/03/2024 21:32

SomeCatFromJapan · 04/03/2024 21:30

Jealous will do that to people. Similar effect to the resentment the OP's youngest might feel when she realises she was denied it because of her sister.

I remember that thread and it wasn't jealousy. The oldest girl had been neglected of her mother's time as she put all her energies into her business. The younger two benefitted from all the time, love and money the eldest never got.

So it wasn't about private school then? Well, it doesn't sound like the OP is neglecting either of her children here, so it's not really an accurate comparison between threads.

Justkeeepswimming · 04/03/2024 21:32

IncyWincyEyeroll · 04/03/2024 20:28

Would all the "younger daughter mustn't be denied private school" posters honestly, if they came into shedloads of money when one of their children was 16 and the other 9, put just the younger into private school?

It seems bizarre to me. While you can't ever achieve perfect fairness in life, you can certainly achieve perfect unfairness

@IncyWincyEyeroll

Well yes because the 16 year old would be GCSE year, settled with friends and moving him/her at that point could disrupt key exam years.

To make it more fair I would offer to pay for extra tuition, give extra support, offer for them to stay home rent free or to pay towards accomodation or car at Uni that sort of thing…

If the DH can afford private school for his offspring he shouldn’t be prevented from it - even now (as she is only in reception!!) - it’s his daughter and it’s something he wants to commit to.

There’s no point moving older girl as she is almost done primary and paying for 7 years private for her at secondary level is an enormous cost that really should be covered by her parents if they want that for her.

If it was a choice between sending one child to private or none, I would absolutely send one. The advantages are worth it.

Justkeeepswimming · 04/03/2024 21:37

Surprisedbuthappy · 04/03/2024 20:28

Well, I'm not suggesting she tells her youngest daughter "Daddy wanted to send you to Marlborough College and buy you a pony, but I said no."

@Surprisedbuthappy

It will be blatantly apparent to the younger daughter that this was the case

Her cousins on her Dad’s side likely go/will go to private school, and there is likely a history of private school attendance within the family too.

Whenever she grows up a bit she will be looking at her elder sister with daggers because it will be extremely obvious what she has missed out on.

Tryingmybestadhd · 04/03/2024 21:37

GasPanic · 04/03/2024 18:37

Maybes.

Maybe it is the grandparents that have offered to pay or contribute, and they feel that with the other brother now getting married they want to be careful how much they commit, as what they do for one grandchild they want to do for all of them.

Doesn’t change the fact the hubby has no backbone . A normal person would say no . As someone with step children and with children from q previous relationship I know to well how had it is to make it fair to everyone . But I could never deny private education to my step children if my own kids had it . And I’m sure my iartnwr thinks the same way

boozeclues · 04/03/2024 21:39

Ok I posted a few times int he last thread and I am going to bite now.

YOUR ELDEST DAUGHTER IS NOT THEIR FAMILY, I don’t get why you don’t think a family photo with an elderly woman with just her biological grandchildren isn’t merited, she gave birth to children and it will be bloody lovely to see all the younger children who might bare a family resemblance in one picture before she dies.

The wider family have zero obligation to your eldest daughter. It does sound like from the start you wanted your husbands family to be your eldests surrogate family, he isn’t legally her dad and from some of your previous posts it sounds like you have purposely alienated some of your eldests paternal family.

Why don’t you take some responsibility for your own life and eldest daughter, facilitate a relationship with her family, rather than trying to force a relationship with people she isn’t related to.

Also if you do divorce your husband over this I actually hope he gets 50/50 as it sounds like at least your youngest will be brought up with a positive outlook on what family life is supposed to be. Not some warped view on who inherits what, you sound really grabby OP, if you married into my family, I would be giving you a wide berth too