To the missogynists people accusing the OP of being batshit/mental/psycho for jumping to conclusions and reacting, while I probably wouldn’t have said anything, reacting is, contrary to what people think on here, an incredibly good idea. Because it shows these men that people are on to their game.
Anyone who thinks this language didn’t imply a threesome is frankly an idiot. Naive is too soft an approach here.
We need to see this for what it is. Creepy, fucked up, sleazy behaviour. Even if he didn’t have a threesome in mind, his language and his actions said the opposite.
So if the OP reacted then that’s on him. The one worthy of an apology is the OP.
And for anyone telling the OP she should be apologising to him, take a long hard look at yourselves and ask yourselves just what it is you’re suggesting.
Or shall I spell it out. You’re suggesting that a woman isn’t entitled to put her safety first. Isn’t entitled to call a man out on his shitty behaviour. At what point is she allowed to react? When he gets her to the door and the threesome is there and waiting? Or when the other woman turns out not to exist and he coerces her into sex anyway or worse?
We need to encourage women to react, not discourage.
I personally would have just told him to fuck off. But that wouldn’t have changed the fact that I was certain he was up for a threesome or that he was a creep in some other way. Voicing it doesn’t make that thought process wrong. So she said it out out. Good for her.