Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel sorry for Shamima Begum?

1000 replies

EWAS · 23/02/2024 12:56

I do, I’m afraid. I think she should be able to come home. She was 15! Have any men been stripped of their citizenship that we know about?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
JustWoww · 23/02/2024 17:03

I don’t think the UK handled this properly - she is British and they should have brought her back in the beginning and taken her to trial.
But I am curious about the whole idea of people feeling sorry for her for being 15. I am wondering if people would be feeling the same if she had of been a 15 year old male and groomed to fight - would such a male be welcomed back too?

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:03

Chumbawambs · 23/02/2024 17:02

How many defenders of Shamima Begum on here want her living next to them in their community or with them? 🤔

How many will continue to defend her if she returned and blew up your family members?

And who is going to risk their life to go out there and bring her back??

And what about the other British women stuck in those camps?

wildernesssw · 23/02/2024 17:03

prh47bridge · 23/02/2024 17:01

A few people seem to think that the judges did not look at the evidence of terrorism at all and only considered whether the Secretary of State acted within their powers. That is not entirely correct.

The judges will have considered whether the Secretary of State made findings that are unsupported by any evidence or that are based on a view of the evidence that no reasonable person could hold. They have, therefore, decided that there is enough evidence to support the conclusion that she is a threat to national security. That is, however, not the same as saying that they would arrive at that conclusion from the evidence.

You are wrong

Dame Sue Carr, the head of the court of appeal, said the judges unanimously dismissed Begum’s appeal: “It could be argued that the decision in Miss Begum’s case was harsh.

It could also be argued that Miss Begum is the author of her own misfortune. But it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view.

Our only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. We have concluded it was not and the appeal is dismissed.”

The original judgement was that:
'they held he was entitled to conclude that fears she posed a risk to national security were more significant because it was “a question of evaluation and judgment” allowed to him in law.'

In other words, the Home Secretary cannot have their opinion challenged, because legally the decision is theirs alone.

Copperoliverbear · 23/02/2024 17:03

Liven up, we would get rid of a lot more terrible people if it wasn't for do gooders like you having the wool pulled over their eyes.
Don't tell me I bet she will say she wants to become a Christian too.

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:04

JustWoww · 23/02/2024 17:03

I don’t think the UK handled this properly - she is British and they should have brought her back in the beginning and taken her to trial.
But I am curious about the whole idea of people feeling sorry for her for being 15. I am wondering if people would be feeling the same if she had of been a 15 year old male and groomed to fight - would such a male be welcomed back too?

Again.....brought her back how.....??

She's in a Syrian camp.... we are just going to walk in and collect her??

Lavender14 · 23/02/2024 17:04

Shabooboogaloo · 23/02/2024 13:01

3 dead children and essentially trafficked at 15.
I do. Unless the government think she is actually a risk?

This. She was a child. She was groomed online and exploited it very much feels like victim blaming and they've made an example of her which isn't fair. I understand there needing to be some sort of consequences but I feel this was inappropriately harsh to enforce when she made the decisions she did at as a vulnerable child.

Prelapsarianhag · 23/02/2024 17:05

She was a child, groomed and trafficked by unscrupulous men. Her poor parents must be devastated.

Boomer55 · 23/02/2024 17:05

Not sorry at all. Best she lays on the bed she made.

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:06

@Lavender14 she's now in her 20's and her mindset hasn't changed....she ain't bovvered seeing a journalists severed head in a bin...

prh47bridge · 23/02/2024 17:06

Also, I note that some have asked how many men have been deprived of citizenship. Figures from May last year showed that, since 2010, at least 847 people had been deprived of citizenship as they had obtained it fraudulently, and at least 217 had it removed "for the public good". We don't have any breakdown by sex, but it is likely that the majority of the "public good" cases were men.

Twiggywinkle13 · 23/02/2024 17:06

She was 15, she was trafficked. She has lived a horrific life. Had she been a white girl she’d have been back and it would all be a terribly tragedy. I can’t believe people also think if she came back to the UK that she just be sort of strolling around Tesco or something. She’d be in prison.

fleurneige · 23/02/2024 17:07

LovelyTheresa · 23/02/2024 16:56

The best way to protect our rights in this case is to not house and feed a terrorist.

She is far far more dangerous abroad, in the hands of more terrorists. And especially as she has been rejected by the UK, and the West in general. Perfect recipe for danger.

Emotionalsupportviper · 23/02/2024 17:07

lightwhiteongrey · 23/02/2024 16:22

I agree with you OP.

She was 15, groomed by very skilled and manipulative adults who wanted to use her as a breeding mare. Once there she was locked up with all the other brood mares, who were not allowed out of the 'women's house' until they married.

From the journalistic investigation ' I am not a monster' series about her, she appears to have been a complete nonentity. She was not an ISIS insider.

She was a child groomed for sex and breeding, she is our citizen and our responsibility. She should not be left stateless.

Its a disgrace.

That investigation also stated that people who had contact with her believed that she was still a danger and was being funded by Isis IIRC. She still believes in "the cause.", for want of a better term.

Lavender14 · 23/02/2024 17:08

Copperoliverbear · 23/02/2024 17:03

Liven up, we would get rid of a lot more terrible people if it wasn't for do gooders like you having the wool pulled over their eyes.
Don't tell me I bet she will say she wants to become a Christian too.

And also, there are terrible people in every country in the world. It doesn't mean you wash your hands of responsibility to people when they do something wrong. Even the worst crimes should be punished within the country the person is from. Its not about 'do gooding' its about deciding what sort of society you want to live in. For me an ethical, caring and accountable society is preferable than one who would abandon a child who was groomed and exploited.

LovelyTheresa · 23/02/2024 17:10

fleurneige · 23/02/2024 17:07

She is far far more dangerous abroad, in the hands of more terrorists. And especially as she has been rejected by the UK, and the West in general. Perfect recipe for danger.

While I see your point, sadly, I really don't think that we should pander to the politics of fear. I get what you are saying about keeping our enemies closer, but also why should we?

Bbq1 · 23/02/2024 17:10

SweetBirdsong · 23/02/2024 16:41

@MySugarBabyLove

The argument that she was a child no longer exists. She was a child. Now she’s a 24 year old woman. She was an adult when she expressed glee at the murder of the Manchester arena bombing victims.

And I don’t believe there ever were any babies. Even the one they showed on that clip of her in the refugee camp, she was so detached from it I don’t believe it was actually her’s, it was just a convenient baby to have to try to elicit sympathy, and people didn’t buy it.

YES to this. 💯

Also, as a number of people have said, I don't believe she has had 3 babies. I don't believe she even had one.

I said alleged babies earlier and was scorned but you cannot trust that woman. I don't believe any babies existed either. The sympathisers are lapping up everything she claims blindly believing it because she says it so it must be so. She ALSO claimed how seeing beheaded heads in bins didn't bother her, she sewed people into suicide vests etc but funnily enough the sympathisers don't mention those truths...

Chumbawambs · 23/02/2024 17:11

Lavender14 · 23/02/2024 17:08

And also, there are terrible people in every country in the world. It doesn't mean you wash your hands of responsibility to people when they do something wrong. Even the worst crimes should be punished within the country the person is from. Its not about 'do gooding' its about deciding what sort of society you want to live in. For me an ethical, caring and accountable society is preferable than one who would abandon a child who was groomed and exploited.

"For me an ethical, caring and accountable society is preferable than one who would abandon a child who was groomed and exploited."

But she is not a child is she, she is an adult and has been involved in active terrorism and murder, also we have not abandoned her she left.

prh47bridge · 23/02/2024 17:11

wildernesssw · 23/02/2024 17:03

You are wrong

Dame Sue Carr, the head of the court of appeal, said the judges unanimously dismissed Begum’s appeal: “It could be argued that the decision in Miss Begum’s case was harsh.

It could also be argued that Miss Begum is the author of her own misfortune. But it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view.

Our only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. We have concluded it was not and the appeal is dismissed.”

The original judgement was that:
'they held he was entitled to conclude that fears she posed a risk to national security were more significant because it was “a question of evaluation and judgment” allowed to him in law.'

In other words, the Home Secretary cannot have their opinion challenged, because legally the decision is theirs alone.

Edited

I am right. Nothing in the text you have reproduced in any way disagrees with my comment. For something to be a question of evaluation and judgement allowed to the SoS in law, any findings of fact must be supported by evidence that can reasonably lead to that finding.

To quote from today's judgement, "SIAC can consider whether the Secretary of State has made findings of fact which are unsupported by any evidence or based on a view of the evidence which could not reasonably be held." If the appellant challenges the SoS findings of fact, the courts will consider if there was adequate evidence to support those findings.

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 23/02/2024 17:12

no no no!! she made her bed when she left UK so now she must lie in it!

MySugarBabyLove · 23/02/2024 17:13

To quote that first they came text in relation to an isis terrorist who took delight in the beheading and death of others is beyond fucking offensive.

Emotionalsupportviper · 23/02/2024 17:14

SweetBirdsong · 23/02/2024 16:25

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

And it is a NO, because even though she was groomed, was very young etc etc, she is breathtakingly arrogant and entitled. Last time - several years ago, she sat there being interviewed, and said 'The UK prime minister is an idiot, he is a fool. He needs to let me back, I am ENTITLED. It's MY country. MINE! How DARE he not allow me back?!'

There was not a SHRED of contrition or remorse, or a single apology. She DEMANDED to be allowed back, after deserting the UK and mixing with terrorists. She is now 24, she is well into adulthood, she made her bed she can lie in it. Basically, she can get tae fuck. She will NEVER be welcome back in the UK.

The fucking cheek or HER! Hmm Not only do I not feel sorry for her. I actually do not give a shit about her. I don't believe she even likes this country (the UK.) She just wants to come back because she knows she is better off here than where she is. Tough!

Footnote: Just discovered she has been refused again! HA HA HA! 😆

.

Edited

And can you imagine the money she'd make. All over the papers, on every TV channel "My Life As An Isis Bride" etc. She'd likely become a figure for young impressionable people to follow - a hero - and she has no remorse. She'd just lead more children down the same evil jihadist path, IMO.

She's dangerous in so many ways.

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:14

I don't think she was groomed by men

She followed her 'best friend' Shaarmina out there. That friend is currently fundraising in order to help IS re group

Nobody is learning lessons

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:15

She's in a heavily guarded prison camp.....even if she won her appeal they aren't going to let her out!

LadyWiddiothethird · 23/02/2024 17:15

I don’t feel a bit sorry for her,she is a terrorist,some of the things she has been quoted as saying send shivers down my spine.

FuzzyManul · 23/02/2024 17:15

HelloMiss · 23/02/2024 17:03

And who is going to risk their life to go out there and bring her back??

And what about the other British women stuck in those camps?

What about them?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread