Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think King Charles would do more for awareness by saying which cancer he has

243 replies

DontLeanOnTheKeyboard · 06/02/2024 21:05

Why all the secrecy? Everyone knows where the prostate is so is fully aware of the initial investigations - if he is happy to share that very personal info, why not say what cancer? It would surely be more useful for him to say ‘it’s this, I had symptoms but ignored them..’

Same as what the Queen died of and I think Kate’s missed a trick in not making herself more human by sharing a little more around the abdo surgery. Childbirth does all kinds of shit to women’s bodies, it seems a good subject to say ‘happens to us all’

Is there some royal protocol that means they can’t say?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
cakeorwine · 06/02/2024 21:14

Saying you've got cancer is not raising awareness.
Saying you noticed blood in your faeces, you went to the GP and they diagnosed bowel cancer is raising awareness.

But he does have a right to privacy. However he is not raising awareness.

I do feel for him and his family though. Most families have experience of cancer so I am sure most people can have an understanding of what they are experiencing.

Kimmeridge · 06/02/2024 21:14

Chitterchatterer · 06/02/2024 21:13

It's probably colon cancer, hence the secrecy.

Why would that be more secretive than another one??

Laiste · 06/02/2024 21:14

I wonder if they are waiting till a positive outcome before revealing the type of cancer?

If it goes badly, or he has a long painful illness it might frighten people into putting their heads back into the sand about screening for it.

saraclara · 06/02/2024 21:14

CavalierApproach · 06/02/2024 21:10

This pretty much sums it up. I mean fgs

Absolutely. Royal or not, they're human beings.

FFS, absolutely no-one owes us their medical information, especially when coming to terms with a cancer diagnosis.
I'm no monarchist, but I think it's appalling that people actually think that they're owed this stuff. I can only think that they're absolutely devoid of empathy.

DontLeanOnTheKeyboard · 06/02/2024 21:14

@cakeorwine you've put it much better than me! This! What awareness has he raised? I heard on the radio he was being lauded across the globe for raising awareness of cancer?! As @Hiphopopotamonster said - everyone knows about cancer fgs, him saying go to the doc if you have symptoms - what bloody symptoms (notwithstanding actually getting a GP appt 😂😂).

And it's not to appease me, silly comment, I was just wondering why the secrecy? Particularly after being happy to share he went for prostate treatment.

OP posts:
eggbot · 06/02/2024 21:15

DG1749 · 06/02/2024 21:14

FWIW I agree with you, but I can imagine a lot of speculation about survival rates for various different kinds of cancer, if we know what it was, so I do get that.

The PoW should 100% have said what her surgery was, assuming it was something routine; eg. could have said hysterectomy without sharing any details of her actual condition. The fact it was the same day that the King announced his prostate issues make it very noticeable that she didn't.

Why? We don't need to know. This is so weird

jcyclops · 06/02/2024 21:15

Revealing the specific cancer would cause a massive interest in that type of cancer and all the other cancers would be pushed into the background, whereas at the moment ALL cancers are increasing in visibilty - something that is bound to help ALL patients and All cancer research and charities.

On a less serious note, I hope it's not ear cancer.

CaineRaine · 06/02/2024 21:15

You do realise he’s an actual person with the right to privacy over what information he shares about his medical history?

Advice400 · 06/02/2024 21:15

The papers would be full of prognosis. This way its kept private and I think it's sensible to give the information he has because many treatments have side effects that are noticeable and require cancellation of his schedule, so no point giving out no information.

eggbot · 06/02/2024 21:16

DontLeanOnTheKeyboard · 06/02/2024 21:14

@cakeorwine you've put it much better than me! This! What awareness has he raised? I heard on the radio he was being lauded across the globe for raising awareness of cancer?! As @Hiphopopotamonster said - everyone knows about cancer fgs, him saying go to the doc if you have symptoms - what bloody symptoms (notwithstanding actually getting a GP appt 😂😂).

And it's not to appease me, silly comment, I was just wondering why the secrecy? Particularly after being happy to share he went for prostate treatment.

That's not on him though. He hasn't gone round saying he's been raising awareness of cancer. He's just been getting on with his life.

Purplecatshopaholic · 06/02/2024 21:16

Agree they didn’t need to mention it at all. Why mention cancer then not what kind? It’s not like the press will just leave it there is it, we’ll never hear the end of it now!

saraclara · 06/02/2024 21:16

The PoW should 100% have said what her surgery was,

Why? She owes us nothing of her private life. Good grief. You don't own the woman.

CatsTheWayToDoIt · 06/02/2024 21:16

No I don’t agree - he’s only just been diagnosed, give him some time to process it!

Tfeidmhi · 06/02/2024 21:16

Medical privacy is important and it would just be endless tv pundits and columns of ohhh this cancer x amount of time to live, he’s going to be dealing with this and this and every non doctor in the uk having an opinion, maybe the whole family doesn’t want to hear that day in day out.

Moliross · 06/02/2024 21:17

His body, his choice. Like everyone else who has had a cancer diagnosis I imagine he's shocked and scared. It's no-one else's business.

cakeorwine · 06/02/2024 21:17

How will cancer affect Charles and the thousands diagnosed every day? | King Charles III | The Guardian

"People with cancer are often encouraged to be positive but it is not always easy. Living with cancer and its treatment can be frightening. However, it is clear that the king hopes his diagnosis may raise greater awareness of the disease.
Buckingham Palace said he chose to share his cancer diagnosis to “prevent speculation and in the hope it may assist public understanding for all those around the world who are affected by cancer”.
Despite the fact that so many will develop the disease like Charles, not everyone is fully aware of the signs and symptoms.
They include changes in bowel habits, bloating, bleeding, lumps, moles, unexplained weight loss, indigestion or heartburn, itchy or yellow skin, tummy or back pain, and feeling tired or unwell."

How will cancer affect Charles and the thousands diagnosed every day?

There are nearly 400,000 cancer cases diagnosed in the UK each year, but survival rates are improving and have doubled in the last half-century

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/05/king-charles-is-among-thousands-diagnosed-with-cancer-every-day

saraclara · 06/02/2024 21:17

Purplecatshopaholic · 06/02/2024 21:16

Agree they didn’t need to mention it at all. Why mention cancer then not what kind? It’s not like the press will just leave it there is it, we’ll never hear the end of it now!

Because the king can't just disappear from view and cancel all his commitments without explanation.

Janetime · 06/02/2024 21:17

DG1749 · 06/02/2024 21:14

FWIW I agree with you, but I can imagine a lot of speculation about survival rates for various different kinds of cancer, if we know what it was, so I do get that.

The PoW should 100% have said what her surgery was, assuming it was something routine; eg. could have said hysterectomy without sharing any details of her actual condition. The fact it was the same day that the King announced his prostate issues make it very noticeable that she didn't.

No she shouldn’t, why the hell should she tell you what’s wrong with her. It is absolutely none of your business.

DrasticAction · 06/02/2024 21:18

Give the poor man time... It's a bloody huge shock!

2Old2Tango · 06/02/2024 21:18

It's nobody's business what the intricate details of their illnesses are. Even royals are entitled to some privacy.

They actually said yesterday that he may reveal later what type of cancer he has, so just be patient while he gets his own head around his diagnosis.

eggbot · 06/02/2024 21:18

Just because someone has cancer it doesn't mean they have to go around raising awareness of it

tennissquare · 06/02/2024 21:19

It's unlikely that the operation that the Princess of Wales had was routine. There may be more complications so of course she should have her privacy.

Moliross · 06/02/2024 21:20

DG1749 · 06/02/2024 21:14

FWIW I agree with you, but I can imagine a lot of speculation about survival rates for various different kinds of cancer, if we know what it was, so I do get that.

The PoW should 100% have said what her surgery was, assuming it was something routine; eg. could have said hysterectomy without sharing any details of her actual condition. The fact it was the same day that the King announced his prostate issues make it very noticeable that she didn't.

No she shouldn't. Her body, her business. No-one else needs to know and if she chooses to keep it private that's up to her. I certainly don't need to know and I can't see that anyone does.

cakeorwine · 06/02/2024 21:21

eggbot · 06/02/2024 21:18

Just because someone has cancer it doesn't mean they have to go around raising awareness of it

They don't

However, the media (and the Palace) have said that by disclosing he has cancer means he is raising awareness of it.

I am sure most people have heard of cancer.

He has a right to privacy.
He did not need to tell people - but it's understandable that something would have been needed to be said.

I just don't think there is a raising of awareness of it.

iamveryearlytoday · 06/02/2024 21:21

Some things are fine to keep private. The type of King's cancer and Kate's abdominal surgery fall into the "fine to keep private" category.