I have now read that this woman, and may she rest in peace, had been trying to separate two puppies from 'fighting' with a broom. The mother's instinct to protect her young no doubt kicked in, hence a tragedy.
Why on earth do we think that dogs should somehow understand what seems to be 'expected' of them these days. They are no longer allowed to be dogs - children are allowed to crawl all over them, we stick them in handbags, dress them up, but we never allow them to be 'dogs' with instincts, not taking time to make proper educated decisions about dog ownership. It's like if someone went up to your child and hit it, you would be expected to stand back and not retaliate, because 'violence' would not be the answer. Most of us would attack and viciously at someone who hurt our child. If you did, you would be shot. But dogs are not allowed to have this instinct. It would be good if someone could tell us how to get rid of it, but they can't. Shoving puppies around with a broom is an act of aggression, and the dog retaliated. If that is indeed what happened.
I find the daily mail type outrage on here ridiculous. 'They all need to go'; they all need to be euthanised, shoot them all, owners of them are 'scum' 'thick' and the like.
When you manage to shoot every xl bully in the country what exactly do you think those who never take responsibility for their dogs - whatever size they are, whatever breed they are - are going to do? They're going to move on to the next breed so until you sort out the people who use these dogs as status symbols, protection in drug rackets and the like, its never ending. The human cost will go on. But, hey, we shot all the xl bullies, so that should make you feel better. It is always going to be the responsible owners who bear the brunt of idiots like the owner in this instance. You will find, I'm sure, that most dog owners and particularly bull breed owners absolutely abhor owners such as this, who has done nothing but brought many many innocent dogs into BSL.
A dog has been shot because it did what it was supposed to do, protect its young, a woman is dead, the owner of the dog allowed his son to witness an horrific incident, the emergency services have had to deal with it, and all because the owner wanted to make money. He flouted the law as it stands at this time; he refused to conform at all in any way. He didn't care about the dogs, that he allowed to be in this situation, he didn't care about his son, and he definitely didn't care about the woman, and I believe he was the one who said she should use a broom to stop whatever was going on. A backyard breeder displaying the most ignorant traits possible, who wilfully put that woman in a dangerous place. That man is the one you should be blaming. It is his fault, and only his fault.
This man needs to be charged with manslaughter; he needs to be banned from ever having a dog. He needs to go to prison for a very long time. However, instead of being charged with manslaughter, I think, he has, at this time, only been arrested for offences under the Dangerous Dogs Act, so tell me again that government cares about the people who have been victims? That they care enough about YOU to prevent these things from happening. They don't, but Joe Public and the media should, and efforts should be put into wanting the law changed so that we can deal with this owner, and the like, and take owners and breeders like this off our streets.