Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Male born person wins women’s golf tournament and is now “worried about his safety” - interviewed by GMB (Title edited by MNHQ)

410 replies

HermioneKipper · 23/01/2024 00:15

Why the hell are GMB gaslighting women with this stuff?

https://twitter.com/GMB/status/1749329378352275568

This is an enormous male-bodied person - even larger than the interviewing man!

Post edited by MNHQ

https://twitter.com/GMB/status/1749329378352275568

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
TheKeatingFive · 23/01/2024 14:17

We have entered the twilight zone. The police actually protecting these paedos with fetishes over young girls

what a time to be alive 😵‍💫

willingtolearn · 23/01/2024 14:36

@TheKeatingFive I don't use the word 'trans' because as mentioned before I don't believe in the ideology around it.

I believe that some people struggle with their physical body, especially around puberty, some struggle with the expectations and limitations that cultures put upon them due to their sex. Others are experiencing a trauma response due to previous experience and there are many other reasons why some of these people are adopting transideological beliefs.

I would like to support those people - I fit into one of those categories but I am not 'trans' (although Stonewall would disagree). I'm just me.

I remember hearing a talk by Katy Jon Went who talked about 'a million different genders' - I don't disagree with the meaning of this, which I believe is just simple acceptance of who we are, how we style our hair, what we wear and our personality.

hollyhola · 23/01/2024 14:37

KnittedCardi · 23/01/2024 14:00

It's one hill I am prepared to die on. Every sport is/was divided into male (born), and female (born) categories to ensure fairness. This was based upon the biological reality that men are taller, stronger, have bigger longer limbs, bigger hearts and lungs, can run faster and longer, and if only one category was present, only men would win, ever. So what would be the point if women entering sport if they had no chance of winning, ever. In golf, in particular, women's clubs are shorter, the tees shorter, their handicaps greater.

This biological reality has not changed.

Why do disability sports spend so much time putting competitors into different categories. To level the playing field. To make it fair. Imagine the uproar if someone pretended to have a disability that the did not in order to game the system.

Great and very clear post

MrsOvertonsWindow · 23/01/2024 19:24

Good to see that this thread has been resurrected after being inexplicably hidden by MNHQ. So many powerful comments from women utterly sick of this whole charade.
The story upthread of the Canadian adult male (uni professor!) who claims to be a woman being allowed to compete against 13 year old girls shows just what WILL happen in the UK unless all this is challenged.

OvaHere · 23/01/2024 19:26

I'm not sure why the title needed editing. We all know what a male born person is.

Dantedisciple · 23/01/2024 19:32

MrsOvertonsWindow · 23/01/2024 19:24

Good to see that this thread has been resurrected after being inexplicably hidden by MNHQ. So many powerful comments from women utterly sick of this whole charade.
The story upthread of the Canadian adult male (uni professor!) who claims to be a woman being allowed to compete against 13 year old girls shows just what WILL happen in the UK unless all this is challenged.

Have you met a man, apart from those who want to compete, who thinks men should be allowed in women's sports? Every man I know thinks it is ridiculous.

EasternStandard · 23/01/2024 19:34

I’m glad this is back but I’m not sure why the title had to be edited. What we can say seems to change

ArabellaScott · 23/01/2024 19:38

We can say 'male' but 'man' sometimes gets zapped.

What a time to be alive.

lola8345 · 23/01/2024 19:42

Mumsnet, you are be definition a women friendly site, set up by women, aimed at women.
Taking this post down, amending the title, disappointing!! stop pandering to the men of this world!!
Freedom of speech.. you seem to really struggle with anything trans..the suffragettes would be very disappointed with you...they weren't about making money with crazy amounts of advertising they were about women rights.

Stop this anti women censorship!

Women should be strong and proud.

Cailleach1 · 23/01/2024 19:45

Overcooker · 23/01/2024 00:56

I have concerns around trans women in women’s sport but this thread is just dripping with hate. I hope it’s deleted.

Pointing out cheaters (and why they are cheaters) is dripping with hate. Catch yourself on.

Boiledbeetle · 23/01/2024 19:46

Excellent back from the dead! That should annoy some posters!

MrsOvertonsWindow · 23/01/2024 19:48

Absolutely @Dantedisciple . The GMB interview mentioned was (yesterday) followed by Susannah and Ed Balls falling off the fence and commenting that women's sport really should be reserved for women for fairness reasons.
Men get this and the comments under articles in the sports sections are generally full of enraged men - all now fully educated about the Lia Thomas's of the world.

Cailleach1 · 23/01/2024 19:52

I gave birth to one of those ‘male born people’. He was a baby boy then. He’s a man now. He hasn’t entered any women’s sports though. I would call him a cheat if he did.

Chichimcgee · 23/01/2024 19:53

‘Male born person’ oh dear.

Dantedisciple · 23/01/2024 19:54

lola8345 · 23/01/2024 19:42

Mumsnet, you are be definition a women friendly site, set up by women, aimed at women.
Taking this post down, amending the title, disappointing!! stop pandering to the men of this world!!
Freedom of speech.. you seem to really struggle with anything trans..the suffragettes would be very disappointed with you...they weren't about making money with crazy amounts of advertising they were about women rights.

Stop this anti women censorship!

Women should be strong and proud.

I don't think it is pandering to the men of this world I think it is pandering to the law of the UK.
Have you ever met a man who is in favour of men or male born persons competing in women's sport?

WickedSerious · 23/01/2024 19:54

Brefugee · 23/01/2024 13:36

thanks, @Helleofabore - i was worried I'd suddenly started posting in Klingon.

The Canadian swimmer thing is just outrageous. And the other parents are now banned from the changing rooms. Frankly? i wonder at ANY of them letting their children swim under those conditions. And yes, i hold them responsible. Because any normal parent would have said "NO" and that would have been it. No more swimmers for that team. Except the big one pretending to be a 13 year old girl

Yes,let the pervert swim on his own.

SillyBilly1993 · 23/01/2024 19:57

Really disappointed by the title change. What on earth is a ‘male-born person’ - surely that it is just a male?!

If the poster considers that a male is a man then they are entitled to that view, just as others are entitled to disagree. It’s not for mumsnet to censor language.

StragglyTinsel · 23/01/2024 19:58

Helleofabore · 23/01/2024 13:27

Straggly Bref is commenting on the incongruence of the term ‘terf’ because as with most feminists, we don’t exclude those females who reject the label of women. Who call themselves transmen.

Bref is pointing out that because we include all female people, even those who have trans identities, the term TERF is a misnomer. Feminists exclude male people. MERF (tongue in cheek) is sometimes used. Male exclusionary radical feminist.

TERF is a ridiculous misnomer. But I don’t think the ‘I’m not a TERF’ argument really plays in to the whole TRA nonsense.

Thing is, TRAs might throw the term around as an insult but I just don’t think it’s worth being insulted by or distancing myself from. They may as well be shouting ‘you are a poo-poo-head’ for all that it’s bullshit.

The position TRAs shout TERF at is really just a pretty standard position that most of us would fit in to.

From the TRA perspective, I think that including female people (trans men) as female would be viewed as hideously ‘trans exclusionary’. But obviously less important trans exclusion because it isn’t centred abound male wants.

ArabellaScott · 23/01/2024 19:59

Dantedisciple · 23/01/2024 19:54

I don't think it is pandering to the men of this world I think it is pandering to the law of the UK.
Have you ever met a man who is in favour of men or male born persons competing in women's sport?

Which law do you think requires women to never use the word 'man' to refer to a male?

HermioneKipper · 23/01/2024 19:59

I did agree to the edit in the interests of keeping the thread up. I think it’s so important that as many people see this stuff as possible.

There’d been lots of reports as the TRAs were out in force on this one.

So in order not to get it zapped I’ll stick with saying ‘male’ rather than man. (Although we all know the truth, even mumsnet really)

OP posts:
StragglyTinsel · 23/01/2024 20:02

It’s not the male bit that’s really stupid. It’s the male born bit that is pure pandering to TRAs.

OvaHere · 23/01/2024 20:04

HermioneKipper · 23/01/2024 19:59

I did agree to the edit in the interests of keeping the thread up. I think it’s so important that as many people see this stuff as possible.

There’d been lots of reports as the TRAs were out in force on this one.

So in order not to get it zapped I’ll stick with saying ‘male’ rather than man. (Although we all know the truth, even mumsnet really)

They aren't obliged to act on those reports though. I'm sure HQ know what a man is.

It's perfectly reasonable to call a man a man and giving you the choice of amending your truthful language or facing permanent deletion is exactly what we've been discussing on this thread. Women having to subjugate themselves to appease the very men who are harming us.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/01/2024 20:05

This thread is just gonna be uber Terfy no doubt like Gwen Stefani.

Has Gwen Stefani become a terf? I hope so 🥰

NotBadConsidering · 23/01/2024 20:14

KnittedCardi · 23/01/2024 14:00

It's one hill I am prepared to die on. Every sport is/was divided into male (born), and female (born) categories to ensure fairness. This was based upon the biological reality that men are taller, stronger, have bigger longer limbs, bigger hearts and lungs, can run faster and longer, and if only one category was present, only men would win, ever. So what would be the point if women entering sport if they had no chance of winning, ever. In golf, in particular, women's clubs are shorter, the tees shorter, their handicaps greater.

This biological reality has not changed.

Why do disability sports spend so much time putting competitors into different categories. To level the playing field. To make it fair. Imagine the uproar if someone pretended to have a disability that the did not in order to game the system.

Imagine the uproar if someone pretended to have a disability that the did not in order to game the system.

This has happened on multiple occasions and there has been uproar. The classification system for Paralympic sport is so flawed I don’t think it’s worth watching.

Strangely though, the concerns of women over essentially the same problem are often ignored. But there has been progress with the outrage. Certain sports have made changes so there is some hope.

Swipe left for the next trending thread