Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask you to ‘Destroy without reading’? (Bereavement related)

353 replies

Izzy24 · 13/01/2024 10:01

Would you?

So if you were coping with clearing personal belongings and you came across a package marked as above, would you respect that person’s privacy and dispose of it without reading? Even if it was unsealed?

OP posts:
CalMeKate · 13/01/2024 18:36

I would 100% read it!!

I have a locked bag in my bedroom which my best friend has promised to destroy. It is full of sex toys so not exactly unexpected just gross for anyone else to find!

greenacrylicpaint · 13/01/2024 18:42

having had to go through deceased relative's belongings after their deaths you really need to look at any paper for documents that might be needed to handle the estate.

NonPlayerCharacter · 13/01/2024 18:46

Mirabai · 13/01/2024 17:57

Not sure where the idea I’m offended comes from?

I disagree Plath didn’t intend them to be published, they are performative and carefully crafted from the start. Her ambitions as a writer and her knowledge of past writers’ work means she knew they would likely be published if she were successful. As with many great writers the journals form part of her oeuvre. Except, sadly the last 2 years of her life are missing.

Not sure where the idea I’m offended comes from?

"Whether you “need” to read the diaries is not the point; I and many others would like to have done regardless of how you feel."

Emphasis: mine. Implication: displeasure and offence. I had nothing to do with the destruction of her diaries, so you've no reason to be displeased, offended, overjoyed or whatever it was that made you in any way concerned with how I feel about it.

You asked.

We aren't entitled to the journals. I'm no fan of Hughes as a poet or a person so I'm not inclined to think sympathetically towards him generally. But I can understand why he might not have wanted the diaries leading up to the suicide of his children's mother to survive, and why the interest of the outside world might not, for him, have outweighed the cost to his family.

WonderingAboutThus · 13/01/2024 18:51

HarpyRampant · 13/01/2024 13:29

Well, I guess it will teach you to destroy anything you don’t want other people to read, not leave it in a folder marked DEFINITELY BURN WITHOUT READING — SENSITIVE MATERIAL I HAVE MYSTERIOUSLY NOT DESTROYED

Yes, I guess!

I mean I never spent much time thinking about this before but I honestly had never thought people might do otherwise then asked.
Been a useful thread then I guess ;-)

Mirabai · 13/01/2024 18:57

NonPlayerCharacter · 13/01/2024 18:46

Not sure where the idea I’m offended comes from?

"Whether you “need” to read the diaries is not the point; I and many others would like to have done regardless of how you feel."

Emphasis: mine. Implication: displeasure and offence. I had nothing to do with the destruction of her diaries, so you've no reason to be displeased, offended, overjoyed or whatever it was that made you in any way concerned with how I feel about it.

You asked.

We aren't entitled to the journals. I'm no fan of Hughes as a poet or a person so I'm not inclined to think sympathetically towards him generally. But I can understand why he might not have wanted the diaries leading up to the suicide of his children's mother to survive, and why the interest of the outside world might not, for him, have outweighed the cost to his family.

Edited

No you misread it entirely. “Regardless of how you feel” referred to the fact that you didn’t “feel the need” to read the diaries, whereas others would like to.

Whoever said we were “entitled” to read the diaries? Clearly not. I understand why he didn’t want the diaries to survive, I just don’t think they were his to destroy. Equally there are ways to preserve them without allowing the children to see them at least until they were adults, but even in their lifetime if he felt necessary.

QAnoun · 13/01/2024 19:14

I’d look. They’re not going to care, they’re dead.

unsync · 13/01/2024 19:55

Had this with my now ex-H's father. Terminal diagnosis and rapid death meant he didn't have the opportunity to clear out his business premises. He told ex-H he should burn everything on first floor without looking. Of course he looked.

There was a dark room and some grim photography of a woman. Said woman also appeared in photos with a child. Turns out ex-H had seen his father with this woman years before and it appeared that FIL had a second family. There were loads of financial documents with odd payments etc to support this.

moaningstoatpoacher · 13/01/2024 20:16

I found a big envelope with 'do not open' written on it after a relative died. I kept it, it was the last thing I had left of them. The last thing left to know, if you like. It was a bit like keeping them still with me. I have read a few of the papers inside it so far, but not all. They are full of that persons inner thoughts and some stuff that is pretty shocking, but I knew them enough that it hasn't changed my view of them or love for them - just given me a little more of them than I had when they were alive. They probably wouldn't have wanted me to read them, but they're dead, it's not going to hurt them now and I'm alive and it helps me. Weirdly the nosiness I have in all other areas of life was mostly absent here - I've had them five years now and have read less than half the papers!

WearyAuldWumman · 13/01/2024 20:56

AutumnFroglets · 13/01/2024 12:10

Don't do that if you have children as they would assume your memories might actually involve them too, such as photographs. Very ambiguous.

I'm childless.

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 13/01/2024 22:56

unsync · 13/01/2024 19:55

Had this with my now ex-H's father. Terminal diagnosis and rapid death meant he didn't have the opportunity to clear out his business premises. He told ex-H he should burn everything on first floor without looking. Of course he looked.

There was a dark room and some grim photography of a woman. Said woman also appeared in photos with a child. Turns out ex-H had seen his father with this woman years before and it appeared that FIL had a second family. There were loads of financial documents with odd payments etc to support this.

And don't you think that information should be public?

whatkatydid2014 · 14/01/2024 08:08

Haven’t read all the responses but I would definitely check the contents. All other considerations aside what if somehow the thing in the envelope isn’t the thing the person intended you not to read anyway. What if they took that out and destroyed it ages ago and then absentmindedly put something else in the envelope. If you find something that’s private and maybe would embarrass your relative for others to read it will be apparent very quickly and you can destroy. Particularly if it’s open I wouldn’t be able to get rid of the thought it could just be mislabelled and what if it is actually important.

lurkish · 14/01/2024 13:38

CalMeKate · 13/01/2024 18:36

I would 100% read it!!

I have a locked bag in my bedroom which my best friend has promised to destroy. It is full of sex toys so not exactly unexpected just gross for anyone else to find!

A very direct woman on the edge of my social circle was sadly widowed at a young age. She came to a catch-up, which was unusual for her - in order to ask how she should recycle the sex toys she had used with her late hubby.
She shared her thinking, at some length that she wouldn't be comfortable using them with anyone else ... even the ones that hadn't been inside him.
Keep your friend close.

midnightfeastfeats · 14/01/2024 14:25

@lurkish what did I just read?

lurkish · 14/01/2024 14:41

midnightfeastfeats · 14/01/2024 14:25

@lurkish what did I just read?

There were around fifteen or twenty of us there when the Scandinavian woman made her earnest request for advice. I'm glad that she got closure - we weren't so lucky.

Mirabai · 14/01/2024 14:42

Scandis are much more open about sex than the British 😆

howdoesyourgardengrowinmay · 14/01/2024 14:48

Peteryourhorseishere · 13/01/2024 10:08

Yes, and I did do With my dads stuff.

He’s not dead yet, but dementia, so he will never look at his stuff again, he couldn’t even tell you what year it is and just stares ahead.

Cleaned out his house when he went into a home. there was a box marked that and it contained some diaries (it wasn’t sealed, the lid was half torn. He also had a box full of diaries, he kept them religiously for years.

Chucked them all away, I had no desire to read his private items when his privacy and dignity is being stripped away daily in he home anyway.

What scares me is the box he’s got for after his death with a DVD marked “to be watched when I die”. I don’t even have a fucking dvd player and I know it will be filled with guilt trips (he was that sort of person), how to invest his money and how lucky I am to have it (he held his money over me his whole life and now all been eaten up by care home fees), I’ve got enough guilt that he ended up in a home. So that will be a fun day!

Get someone you trust to watch the video first and if it's a guilt trip they can advise you not to watch it - at least leave it for a couple of years.

midnightfeastfeats · 14/01/2024 15:18

I'm glad that she got closure - we weren't so lucky.

@lurkish LOL! I'm not surprised.

what advice did you give her? freecycle? the neighbours? keep them as a momento? bury them in the garden with a little memorial?

celticprincess · 14/01/2024 17:37

We had an interesting time going through my dad’s things. Nothing marked private don’t read. But lots of folders of papers dating back so far we sent them to confidential waste - bank, pensions, house purchase documents etc. we kept relevant things. We also found his porn stash and just laughed and binned. My sister was expecting to find it. We found diaries but not the journal type. He kept obsessive notes about eating and drinking and whereabouts. We kept them in a box and didn’t read.

Messyhair321 · 14/01/2024 17:40

Yes I have a letter like this & I'd be devastated if someone didn't respect my wishes

godmum56 · 14/01/2024 17:41

Mirabai · 13/01/2024 14:41

On a different note - Im very aware of writers and artists or historical figures whose officious families threw away early novels, poems, dairies or letters than offended their conservative sensibilities - but would have been so valuable to posterity.

John Murray destroyed Byron’s memoirs which Byron had specifically wanted published and had handed to an Irish poet to preserve. Ted Hughes destroyed one of Sylvia Plath’s diaries, someone in Kipling’s family destroyed an early novel called Mother Maturin set in Lahore. Cassandra Austen was very careful to destroy many of Jane’s letters and censor others to protect her reputation and her privacy. But - how insightful they would be now!

But those examples are not people who had wanted the stuff destroyed?

axolotlfloof · 14/01/2024 17:53

My Mum died unexpectedly so she didn't label her diaries. I did look at them. I don't understand why she wrote them. They say things like 'went to the work, then dentist. All fine'. I would love to know why she wrote them.

Jumpers4goalposts · 14/01/2024 17:53

I honestly don’t know, I wouldn’t destroy it though I would put it somewhere safe and have a good think about it.

MumTeacherofMany · 14/01/2024 18:08

I wish i could say I wouldn't read them. That is definitely the ethical thing to do. In reality I'm too nosy

Jayne35 · 14/01/2024 18:11

Definitely destroy, it could be someone’s diaries that they have kept for years, some people put their most personal feelings in those, which they wouldn’t want to share.

KarenandFour · 14/01/2024 18:23

Not even gonna pretend ….id look 🤷‍♀️😂